Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:6a-4")   16 to 30 of 269 results. Run time: 0.887 seconds | Search time: 0.880 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 Previous 15 Next 15
16 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 804
... that provided personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The policies that USF&G issued to the owners of ... to provide PIP benefits, which include reimbursement of medical expenses, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. "Automobile" is defined as: [A] private passenger automobile of a ... for the purpose of determining eligibility for PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, the term "automobile" does not include a bus.     In 1991 ... from a bus is not entitled to PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 because a bus is not included in the definition of ... A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 provides: Primacy of coverages Except as provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], the personal injury protection coverage of the named ...
docket: a5757-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: 376 N.J. Super. 475
Document Size: 33613
17 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 804
... that provided personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The policies that USF&G issued to the owners of ... to provide PIP benefits, which include reimbursement of medical expenses, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. "Automobile" is defined as: [A] private passenger automobile of a ... for the purpose of determining eligibility for PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, the term "automobile" does not include a bus.     In 1991 ... from a bus is not entitled to PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 because a bus is not included in the definition of ... A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 provides: Primacy of coverages Except as provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], the personal injury protection coverage of the named ...
docket: a4478-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 33589
18 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 804
... that provided personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The policies that USF&G issued to the owners of ... to provide PIP benefits, which include reimbursement of medical expenses, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. "Automobile" is defined as: [A] private passenger automobile of a ... for the purpose of determining eligibility for PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, the term "automobile" does not include a bus.     In 1991 ... from a bus is not entitled to PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 because a bus is not included in the definition of ... A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 provides: Primacy of coverages Except as provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], the personal injury protection coverage of the named ...
docket: a6668-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 33589
19 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 802
... as their primary coverage for injuries sustained in automobile accidents. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3d. If the insured makes this election, the PIP coverage ... whose insured has designated the health insurance as primary under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3d, is required to participate in arbitration of claims pursuant ... I This case arises from the following facts. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3d, Joseph Kutschman, Jr. designated his health insurer as his ... automobile or health insurance. He also based his decision on N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3d, which requires health insurers and auto insurers to coordinate ... sustain bodily injury as a result of an [automobile] accident [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.] The same section defines PIP coverage as "[p]ayment of ... subject to any option elected by the policyholder pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3]." Section 4.3 in turn requires automobile insurers ...
docket: a0712-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-11-03
status: published
citation: 403 N.J. Super. 518 959 A.2d 858
Document Size: 68704
20 RUTGERS CASUALTY INS. CO. VS THE OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO. -- rank: 802
... Rutgers' insureds were also "other insureds" under defendants' automobile policies. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.     Rutgers paid its insureds PIP benefits and then sought "contribution ... struck by an object propelled by or from such automobile. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.] N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 also requires insurers ... the household of an insured.     In 1983 the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. This amendment established which PIP policy was "primary," L ... an automobile insurance policy of his own. See footnote 2 [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2.]     The Act permits insurers to exclude an insured from ... New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act." Id. at 447. Considering N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -11, we held that Defendant's insurance policy provision ... invalid. Id. at 614.     Then in 1983 the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2, L. 1983, c . 362, § 12, which stated in ...
docket: a4103-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-04-01
status: published
citation: 299 N.J.Super. 249
Document Size: 35044
21 MELANIE WALCOTT v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 792
... non-economic loss sustained as a result of the accident." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(b).     Plaintiff thereafter filed suit seeking PIP benefits pursuant ... the event they suffer bodily injury in an automobile accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. "This system of first-party self-insurance through PIP benefits ... 1992). Additionally, motorists not carrying the compulsory insurance required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 were restricted in their ability to sue for non-economic ... eliminated altogether, L. 1997, c. 151, § 13 (current version at N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5).     Significantly, the Legislature addressed exclusions from PIP coverage separately ... insurance and overburdened court calendars. Thus, in 1985, it enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5. While Section 7 addresses limitations on first-party claims ... but fails to maintain medical expense benefits coverage mandated by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] shall have no cause of action for recovery of ...
docket: a5569-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-13
status: published
citation: 376 N.J. Super. 384
Document Size: 26511
22 IN THE MATTER FAILURE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE TO TRANSMIT A PROPOSED DENTAL FEE SCHEDULE TO THE OAL FOR PUBLICATION IN THE NEW JERSEY REGISTER -- rank: 790
... New Jersey Dental Association ("NJDA"), must be adjusted mandatorily, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6a, every two years to reflect inflation. Hoping to force ... complying with the legislative mandate.                         I.      The Legislature first enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 in 1988 as a cost containment measure. P.L ... 8, §2(d). Through the Fair Act, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 to require, among other things, that reimbursement rates established ... Insurance Association of America.     In 1997, the Legislature again amended N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 by authorizing the Department to "contract with a proprietary ... year after the effective date of the 1997 amendment to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6, four days before AICRA was signed into law, and ... prevailing fees of 75% of the practitioners within the region." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6a. The Department has completed and proposed in the ...
docket: a5311-98
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-01-17
status: published
citation: 336 N.J.Super. 253
Document Size: 41618
23 IN RE ADOPTION OF N.J.A.C. 11:3-29 -- rank: 780
... the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, P.J.A.D. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 requires the Commissioner of the Department of Banking and ... prevailing fees of 75% of the practitioners within the region.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6. To implement the statutory mandate, the Department promulgated new ... Super. 374, 384 (App. Div. 1996). To meet the objectives, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 mandated that every standard automobile liability insurance policy contain PIP ... of contact with an automobile. In 1988, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 as a 'cost containment measure.' In re the Failure ... 256; L. 1990, c. 8. As part of the reform, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 was amended to require, among other things, that the PIP ... in the fee schedules. Ibid. In 1997, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6. L. 1997, c. 151, § 33. The new law ...
docket: a0344-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-10
status: published
citation: 410 N.J. Super. 6 979 A.2d 770
Document Size: 87431
24 CATHRYNE M. LOFTUS-SMITH V. GREGORY A. SMITH, ET AL -- rank: 778
... and is entitled to receive no-fault PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The second prong focuses on the plaintiff's "characteristics," namely ... or (ii) has a right to receive PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Weiss , supra , 274 N.J. Super. at 41-42.     A ... Insurance Law §15:3-3b, at 186 (1995) (emphasis added).]      N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 requires every automobile insurance policy to provide for the payment ... owner, registrant, operator or occupant of an automobile to which [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4], personal injury protection coverage, regardless of fault, applies, and every ... a person who has a right to receive benefits under [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4], as a result of bodily injury, arising out of the ... owner, registrant, operator or occupant of an automobile to which [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4], personal injury protection coverage . . . applies . . . is hereby exempted from ...
docket: a1720-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-01-23
status: published published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 39433
25 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 776
... An insurer paying personal injury protection benefits in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or 39:6A-10], as a result of an accident ... health maintenance organization or governmental agency paying benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], personal injury protection benefits in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N ...
docket: a-33-14
court: New Jersey Supreme Court
decided: 2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size: 107061
26 WENDY ZUIDEMA et al. v. JAMES J. PEDICANO, M.D. et al. -- rank: 764
... plaintiffs' automobile insurance policies. The judge rested her decision on N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5b, which precludes an injured person, convicted of operating a ... or noneconomic loss sustained as a result of the accident. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5b.] The Law Division construed this provision as barring defendant ... influence of alcohol. The judge said the "entire purpose" of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5b was "in furtherance of deterrence of drunk-drivers on ... under the influence of alcohol, we do not agree that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5b precludes a defendant who was intoxicated in connection with ... and a fair rate of return to insurers." Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. . . . The second prong focuses on the plaintiff's "characteristics," namely ... or (ii) has a right to receive PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. [ Beaugard v. Johnson , 281 N.J. Super. 162 , 167- ...
docket: a3867-02
court: njappellate
decided: 2004-11-24
status: published
citation: 373 N.J. Super. 114
Document Size: 27850
27 Cooper Hospital University Medical Center v. Selective Insurance Company of America -- rank: 757
... regardless of who was at fault in causing the accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a) (1977). The Act imposed on the automobile insurance carrier ... expenses arising from the 1977 automobile accident, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (1977).4 Sometime after 1979 but before 2016, Mecouch was ... p]ersonal injury protection [PIP] coverage, regardless of fault.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (1977). PIP coverage guaranteed the insured, the insured’s family ... result of personal injury sustained in an automobile accident.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a) (1977). The No Fault Act placed restrictions on the ... survivor expenses, and funeral expenses provided in the PIP statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, shall be payable as loss accrues, . . . except that benefits collectible ... PIP benefits to make automobile insurance premiums more affordable. Compare N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a) (1977), with N.J.S.A. 39:6A- ...
docket: a-46-20
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2021-12-22
status:
citation:
Document Size: 71434
28 ALMA GUERRERO v. HELEN COLLEEN MOORE -- rank: 757
... judge found plaintiff's suit must be dismissed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 for "failure to maintain the required medical expense coverage ... Pennsylvania, and therefore, she should not be considered "uninsured" under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a). We disagree. Because plaintiff's Pennsylvania insurance did ... coverage not to exceed $250,000 per person, per accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Additionally, the statute at N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) places a bar on the ability to sue ... 1, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This gives uninsured drivers a strong incentive to be compliant ... either N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4; therefore, plaintiff is barred from suit under N.J. ...
docket: a4197-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-01-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24923
29 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 754
... to satisfy * * * personal injury protection [PIP] benefits coverage pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] * * * whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ... paid by an insurer, in accordance with subsection a. [of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4], are in excess of $75,000.00 on account of ... and Home insist that their policies are written pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 because they must provide the benefits set forth in that ... provides for reimbursement of excess medical expenses paid pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, the UCJF must reimburse medical expenses paid under an out ... such cases because those provisions come into play only when N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 is in effect. In those scenarios there would be a ...
docket: a-114-94
court: njsupreme
decided: 1995-07-31
status:
citation: 141 N.J. 279
Document Size: 46930
30 ADAM M. HABER v. FAITH N. GERULDSEN -- rank: 752
... judgment, contending plaintiff failed to insure his vehicle pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, rendering plaintiff culpably uninsured under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a). In opposing summary judgment, plaintiff argued he was ... Protection (PIP) benefits sufficient to comport with the requirements under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. After reviewing the written submissions and hearing the arguments of ... New York policy through State Farm Insurance Company.' Thus, applying N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5, the judge held plaintiff had 'no cause of action ... non-economic damages for drivers not insured in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5. On appeal, plaintiff raises the same arguments presented to ... 000 in PIP benefits, in accordance with New Jersey law. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 governs the coverage requirements to be fully insured ...
docket: a0775-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-12-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20391
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!