Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 COOPER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 635

... filed a complaint seeking payment of PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a), from defendant, for the $853,663 it had incurred ... after reviewing the cross-motions, the court ruled that under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, defendant is responsible for Mecouch's PIP benefits covering the ... 6A-6, as it existed in 1977, the benefits of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 were 'payable as loss accrues, upon written notice of such ...

docket:	a0603-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40147

77 ISMAEL CRUZ-DIAZ v. PETER J. HENDRICKS -- rank: 633

... benefits. Liberty Mutual paid all bills submitted, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 prior to the December 3, 2001 surgery. However, Liberty Mutual ... payment. We agree with Liberty Mutual, as did Judge Happas. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 lists the benefits provided under "Personal injury protection coverage." These ...

docket:	a4608-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-10
status:	published
citation:	409 N.J. Super. 268 976 A.2d 1092
Document Size:	38753

78 JOHN K. DEVER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 633

... Zabilowicz v. Kelsey , 200 N.J. 507 , 509 (2009) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -3.1(a), -3.3(b)(1)). "Those medical benefits ...

docket:	a3102-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60408

79 COALITION FOR QUALITY HEALTH CARE, et al. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, DIVISION OF INSURANCE -- rank: 633

... 3-29.4(o). Appellants argue that the Commissioner violated N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 and acted outside the authority delegated to her under ... statutory authority most pertinent to this appeal is found in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6(a):         The Commissioner of Banking and Insurance shall, within ... fees of 75% of the practitioners within the region" in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 was first enacted, in 1988, as part of the ... the critical "reasonable and prevailing fees" language first appeared in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6, L. 1990, c. 8, § 7, this language has been ... fee schedule that the Department adopts after AICRA, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6a, must of necessity consider and conform with AICRA's ... and management services are within the grant of authority in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6. We agree with the Department.      N.J.A. ...

docket:	a5795-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2003-03-07
status:	published
citation:	358 N.J. Super. 123
Document Size:	24669

80 HERBERT HURTADO v. JENNIFER WILKINS -- rank: 633

... negligence action against another motorist. The trial court held that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) barred plaintiff from pursuing his claim because he ... s negligence action in this case, on the ground that N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 4.5(a) barred plaintiff from maintaining suit. The provision states ... not further the overall purpose of A-1866-17T2 5 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a). We are unconvinced. Reviewing Judge Kenny's order ... retroactively voided the wife's policy based on misrepresentation. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a), he was barred from pursuing his damages claim ... owner of an automobile . . . shall maintain automobile liability insurance coverage'); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (stating 'every standard automobile liability insurance policy . . . shall maintain [medical ... not A-1866-17T2 6 be barred from relief by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 because the operator, as a non- owner, was ...

docket:	a1866-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19886

81 JOY ANN AQUILIO, ET AL., VS CONTINENTAL INS. CO., OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL -- rank: 630

... to increase the amount of any death benefits payable under [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4]..." Relying on Capelli v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. , 209 ... J. 560 (1978). In Muschette , the Supreme Court held that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10, read together ...

docket:	a3615-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-03-31
status:	published
citation:	310 N.J.Super. 558
Document Size:	25829

82 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2101-19.opn.html -- rank: 630

... named insured' on the USAA policy by operation of statute. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 provides in relevant part: [E]very standard automobile liability insurance ... the terms of another policy . . . .' These exclusions are consistent with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2, which provides in relevant part: [T]he [PIP] coverage ... Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g)). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 requires every standard automobile insurance policy to provide PIP coverage ... sustained while occupying any vehicle, or even as a pedestrian. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Selling a policy that purports to exclude a 'named insured ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34622

83 Christina DiProspero v. Barbara J. Penn, et al. -- rank: 630

... of medical expense benefits substantially increased and insurance premiums soared. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7, and “may not be experimental in nature or dependent ... 1 provides less PIP coverage than in a standard policy, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Footnote: 8 See James , supra , 354 N.J. Super. at ...

docket:	a-66-03
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2004-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	73117

84 NICOLE PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 626

... York law. PIP coverage in New Jersey is governed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, which requires the insurer to provide the following option ... apply to provide the coverage that would be available under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3. The New York policy provided $50,000 in PIP ... 3, which include the personal injury protection coverage described in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or basic policies providing direct insurance on an automobile as ... A. 39:6B-1, which provides PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -3.1(a), -3.3(b)(1). See Zabilowicz , supra ...

docket:	a2783-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90263

85 DAVID STEVENSON VS STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY & ET ALS -- rank: 623

... carrier must provide personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, See footnote 2 to claimants who sustained bodily injuries during ... as in Ponter , the potential defense under the statutory exclusion, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The basic issue of coverage for these two incidents properly ... occupying, entering into, alighting from or using an automobile." See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (Historical and Statutory Notes). Both insurance companies assert the amendatory ... by the victim.      The Supreme Court in Lindstrom recognized that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 "was not designed to function as general crime insurance." 138 ... result of an accident while occupying ... or using an automobile." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. In Mondelli v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 102 ... motion for purposes of opinion. Footnote: 2 In pertinent part N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 states:          Personal injury protection coverage, regardless of fault.             Every ...

docket:	a2861-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-14
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 363
Document Size:	40318

86 KATHLEEN LEGGETTE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY quot;GEICO" and DERICK HARRIS -- rank: 623

... insurance requirements of . . . personal injury protection benefits coverage pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] . . . whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ... injured is irrelevant. Plaintiff also argues this interpretation aligns with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4's requirements, which mandate every standard automobile insurance policy shall ... Jersey accident before the Deemer Statute is triggered." Defendant asserts N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4's PIP requirements apply only if the Deemer Statute is ... to $250,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, see N.J.S.A . 39:6A-4, irrespective of the comparable benefits mandated by the insured's ... are covered by the Deemer Statute's specific reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, which provides PIP benefits to pedestrians injured caused by a ... automobile in the context of eligibility for PIP benefits[,]" per N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Negron v. Colonial Penn Ins. , 358 N.J. Super. ...

docket:	a1911-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-30
status:	published
citation:	450 N.J.Super. 261 161 A.3d 769
Document Size:	31624

87 DAVID STEVENSON VS STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY & ET ALS -- rank: 623

... carrier must provide personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, See footnote 2 to claimants who sustained bodily injuries during ... as in Ponter , the potential defense under the statutory exclusion, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The basic issue of coverage for these two incidents properly ... occupying, entering into, alighting from or using an automobile." See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (Historical and Statutory Notes). Both insurance companies assert the amendatory ... by the victim.      The Supreme Court in Lindstrom recognized that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 "was not designed to function as general crime insurance." 138 ... result of an accident while occupying ... or using an automobile." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. In Mondelli v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 102 ... motion for purposes of opinion. Footnote: 2 In pertinent part N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 states:          Personal injury protection coverage, regardless of fault.             Every ...

docket:	a4332-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-14
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 363
Document Size:	37592

88 ANDRES SOLORZANO v. PETER SAPUNARICH, J&S DI -- rank: 623

... for summary judgment, asserting that the suit was barred by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5. The motion judge granted summary judgment, and this appeal ... suffered in an automobile injury or caused by an automobile. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Injured automobile drivers who are uninsured do not receive these ... of America , 178 N.J. 460 , 466-71 (2004). Accordingly, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 bars suit by uninsured automobile operators as follows: Any ... but fails to maintain medical expense benefits coverage mandated by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] shall have no cause of action for recovery of economic ... a result of an accident while operating an uninsured automobile. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5.] By excluding culpably uninsured automobile operators, the statutory intention ... erroneously fails to consider the type of vehicle defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 with any motorized vehicle. However, "automobile" is defined ...

docket:	A2129-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-23
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	41129

89 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0980-17.opn.html -- rank: 619

... in medical benefits coverage. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) barred plaintiff's claims because the Commissioner did ... was enacted to prevent reverse rate evasion. Plaintiff countered that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) violates procedural due process because it provides no ... Ryerson, 277 N.J. Super. 22, 26 (App. Div. 1994)). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) provides: A-0980-17T3 4 Any person who ... an accident while operating an uninsured automobile. The Legislature adopted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 in 1997 to limit the ability of persons injured ... Pomeroy, New Jersey Auto Insurance Law § 15:1 (2018). ' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a) advances a policy of cost containment by ensuring ... medical expense benefits coverage of $15,000 per person. Consequently, N.J.S.A. 39:6A- -4.5(a) bars plaintiff's cause of action for ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11324

90 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 616

... for all "reasonable, necessary, and appropriate" treatment for bodily injuries. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. A "basic policy," which is available as "an alternative to ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551