Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 NORTH JERSEY NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., as subrogee of PEDRO GIL v. CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 594

... who is not a named insured on another policy. Specifically, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 provides: [T]he personal injury protection coverage of the named ... to share in the cost of the settlement and expenses"); N.J .S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (stating that "[n]o person shall recover personal injury protection ...

docket:	A3735-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-05-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	67492

17 NORMA BLANCO-SANCHEZ v. PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 594

... named insured under an automobile insurance policy of his own.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. This 'first-party coverage was 'intended to serve as the ...

docket:	a5393-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26064

18 JACQUELINE JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 586

... 2005), we held that bus MEB is not subject to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (primacy of coverages for PIP benefits between automobile insurers), thus ... A. l7:28-1.6 of a provision comparable to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2, requiring MEB to be paid by an injured bus passenger ...

docket:	A3968-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-16
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 194 917 A.2d 803
Document Size:	44663

19 IFA INSURANCE COMPANY v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 575

... insurance carrier that has paid out PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 See footnote 3 3 from receiving contribution from other carriers ... relevant to this appeal. Footnote: 2      2 Footnote: 3     3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 states, in relevant part:         [T]he personal injury protection coverage ...

docket:	a6089-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-06-01
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	14198

20 RAYMOND NESBY and LAUREN NESBY -- rank: 564

... permits 'stacking of policies' for PIP benefits. On the contrary, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 expressly prohibits an insured from recovering PIP benefits from multiple ...

docket:	a0958-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-18
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20320

21 KAREN METAKES PARISI VS AETNA CAS. & SURETY CO. -- rank: 521

... J. Super. 524 (App. Div. 1992), of the import of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. That provision, enacted in 1983, has a two-pronged significance ... pay limits on her own policy, Martin was precluded by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 from recourse against its policy. In rejecting that argument, this ... schemes. We conclude that the Legislature did not intend by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 to preclude a seriously injured victim from recovering the statutorily ...

docket:	a5988-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-01-06
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 179
Document Size:	17526

22 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALICE KENNEDY -- rank: 513

... in Alice's household, for purposes of PIP coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. He did not credit Christopher's testimony concerning his residence ... automobile insurance policy for injuries sustained in any one accident. [ N.J.S . A . 39:6A-4.2.] Consequently, although Christopher was a passenger in a vehicle that ...

docket:	a4376-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46445

23 RUTGERS CASUALTY INS. CO. VS NJ MANUFACTURERS INS. CO. -- rank: 510

... 39:6A-11 (section 11) and argues that enactment of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (section 4.2) has no effect on NJM's obligations ...

docket:	a2632-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-10-24
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	7340

24 ENDO SURGI CENTER v. NJM INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 508

... 1 'PIP' means personal injury protection as provided for in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 2 Endo Surgi's claim requested reimbursement for services on three ...

docket:	a1934-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:	459 N.J.Super. 289 209 A.3d 904
Document Size:	16175

25 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4045-19.opn.html -- rank: 502

... PIP) benefits, asserting plaintiff's GEICO policy was 'PRIMARY.' See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (authorizing PIP benefits 'for the named insured and any resident ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22041

26 CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. KEYA KUFF -- rank: 470

... n v. Bastien , 175 N.J. 144 , 148 (2003) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4). 2 Defendant's notice of appeal also reflects an appeal of ...

docket:	a2712-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27470

27 MEITAL RAVIV v. FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP, -- rank: 429

... may be liable, the primary insurer is identified pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. The statute states: Except as provided in subsection d. of ... automobile insurance policy for injuries sustained in any one accident. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2.] At the time in question, Raviv no longer lived with ...

docket:	a5074-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	23190

28 LORRAINE WALSH et al. v. MICHAEL WALSH -- rank: 308

... named insured under an automobile insurance policy of his own." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. Thus, the question is whether Michael Jr. at the time ...

docket:	A0412-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-10-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32149