Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:6a-5.1")   31 to 45 of 51 results. Run time: 0.663 seconds | Search time: 0.660 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 Previous 15 Next 6
31 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BERGEN AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER -- rank: 624
... payment. If not, BASC initiates PIP arbitration proceedings pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a): a. Any dispute regarding the recovery of medical expense ... initiative of any party to the dispute, as hereinafter provided. [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a).] B. The Legislature structured a detailed and careful arrangement ...
docket: a0307-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-10-07
status: published
citation: 410 N.J. Super. 270 982 A.2d 1
Document Size: 14373
32 HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH v. CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE -- rank: 599
... and amount of PIP coverage are determined in 'dispute resolution.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a); see Citizens United Reciprocal Exch. V. N. N.J ...
docket: a1486-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-06-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23057
33 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a5810-13.opn.html -- rank: 589
... Yoo demanded arbitration with the National Arbitration Forum pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a) and N.J.A.C. 11:3-5.1 ... injury protection ("PIP") benefits may be submitted to dispute resolution. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. A PIP dispute can involve the application of, or adherence ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 17524
34 CRANIO ASSOCIATES v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 586
... assignee, Cranio filed a petition for a PIP arbitration, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1, seeking payment for the two TMJ surgeries and related treatment ...
docket: a6041-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-03-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30424
35 PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY , v. RELIEVUS -- rank: 583
... of Banking and Insurance to administer PIP benefits disputes. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(b). 2 A-2393-16T2 with the court to vacate ... even though disputes resolved by a DRP are binding under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(c), 'both the Commissioner [of Banking and Insurance]'s own ...
docket: a2393-16
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-08-03
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 20302
36 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES -- rank: 558
... to resolve a PIP dispute through alternate dispute resolution (ADR). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. It did not change the standard of review imposed by ...
docket: A1491-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-01-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37510
37 THE BACK INSTITUTE v. HIGH POINT INSURANCE -- rank: 545
... 2011, plaintiff filed a demand for arbitration 2 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. Both parties submitted extensive medical records and reports and set ...
docket: a2721-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-04-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31059
38 HEATHER ADCOX v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 539
... in lieu of filing an action in the Superior Court. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. Under AICRA, the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance is charged ...
docket: A1863-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-10-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 42842
39 IRA KLEMONS v. GEICO -- rank: 509
... resolution on the initiative of any party to the dispute . . . ." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a). Arbitration of PIP disputes must be conducted under the ... 2010). A ppeal dismissed. 1 In accordance with statutory mandate, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(b), the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance designated the NAF ...
docket: a3669-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-10-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16176
40 LURETHA M. STRIBLING v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER\'S INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 498
... mandate of the appellate court" and decide the issues; (2) N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1 does not require the matter to be arbitrated again after ...
docket: a6167-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-07-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23971
41 DR. AMRISH PATEL v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 490
... this State's personal injury protection (PIP) arbitration administrator. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...
docket: a0394-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-06-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16672
42 SURGICAL CENTER MILLBURN v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 482
... whether benefits are due may be resolved through binding arbitration. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a). Such arbitrations must be conducted through the procedures set ...
docket: a2251-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-07-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24880
43 MAYHILL MEDICAL GROUP v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 468
... whether benefits are due may be resolved through binding arbitration. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1(a). Such arbitrations must be conducted through the procedures set ...
docket: a2334-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-04-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16190
44 MARY DELGRANDE v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 463
... was required to submit the dispute to arbitration pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. The motion judge agreed and entered an order on August ... Ctr. , 425 N.J. Super. 48, 56 (App. Div. 2012). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1 provides: Any dispute regarding the recovery of medical expense benefits ...
docket: a2201-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37422
45 Selective Insurance Company of America v. Arthur C. Rothman, M.D. -- rank: 457
... performed by defendant’s PA, defendant pursued PIP arbitration. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-5.1. After defendant prevailed in that forum, he filed a complaint ...
docket: A-60-10
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2012-01-18
status:
citation: 208 N.J. 580 34 A.3d 769
Document Size: 38707
 Page:1 2 3 4 Previous 15 Next 6
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!