Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 HERBERT HURTADO v. JENNIFER WILKINS -- rank: 629

... J. Super. 73, 77-78 (App. Div. 2005) (noting that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1), which refers to 'the owner or registrant,' 'does ... Super. at 81-82. However, the court did hold that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1) barred the husband from collecting personal injury protection ...

docket:	a1866-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19886

17 KIMBERLY BRITTEN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 585

... as a primary insured under her mother's policy, and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(4) permitted defendant to deny PIP benefits to plaintiff ...

docket:	A2440-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-01-12
status:	published
citation:	389 N.J. Super. 556 914 A.2d 305
Document Size:	17844

18 EDWARD G. STEWART VS. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 559

... benefits as he does not fall within the exclusion in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, and that public policy requires the PIP exclusionary provision should ... that his conduct does not fall within the exclusion of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7. He contends Kaplowitz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Co. , 201 ... 11-5 is a high misdemeanor within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(a).     Viewing the circumstances here, we are convinced that plaintiff ... contention that public policy requires that the exclusionary provision under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 is not applicable here is without merit and requires no ...

docket:	a1585-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-02-26
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	14376

19 ROSEMARY FOEHNER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 545

... of plaintiff's eligibility for PIP benefits in light of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7. We reverse and remand for a resolution of that issue ... the named insured, with permission of the named insured. However, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 limits PIP benefits by allowing insurers to deny claims by ... out of commission" status of her pick-up truck under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7. If plaintiff prevails, after a recess, the matter should proceed ...

docket:	a4640-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	28057

20 BRENDA DEMA v. MARY ANN BRESLIN -- rank: 545

... engraft the element of scienter into the exclusionary provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 where the plaintiff, a passenger in a stolen vehicle, claimed ...

docket:	a3504-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-12-07
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18088

21 YVONNE MARTIN v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 539

... Lockhart car. Plaintiff argued the policy provisions were invalid under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 and further, that she had a driver's license issued ... whether the Rutgers exclusion is invalid under New Jersey law. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 sets forth certain limited situations in which an insurer may ... 1998) in which we stated, in another context, "The statute [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7] countenances no other true exclusions from PIP benefits." Plaintiff contends ...

docket:	a6353-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-01-04
status:	published
citation:	171 N.J. 40
Document Size:	14681

22 ANA BIRCK v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 536

... of residence in her application for insurance; and (2) under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, to conclude that plaintiff was not entitled to PIP medical ... provisions. Finally, we affirm the trial court's application of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, which resulted in the denial of PIP benefits to plaintiff ... exclusions based on conduct of the claimant, as found in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, which provides: b. An insurer may also exclude from the ... State that was being operated without personal injury protection coverage[.] [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1).] "[T]he legislative intent of 211 N.J ...

docket:	A2398-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29511

23 TYRELL HARDY, by et al. v. HAMZA ABDUL-MATIN, MERRICK L. HARRIS, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, and JOSEPH M. KULAK -- rank: 516

... policy insuring that 'auto.'" The exclusion mirrors the text of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, as it was amended by L. 1983, c. 362, §10 ...

docket:	A2153-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-02
status:	published
citation:	397 N.J.Super. 574 938 A.2d 938
Document Size:	58681

24 VIDAL PADILLA v. PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 504

... defendant issued a denial of coverage to plaintiff, relying on N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1). 1 Plaintiff filed this action against defendant, alleging ... courts have precluded a person from collecting PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1) simply because he or she was the owner ... State that was being operated without personal injury protection coverage." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(1). Defendant's policy mirrored the statute's language ...

docket:	a3089-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27293

25 GARY & BARBARA CAMPBELL VS LION INSURANCE CO. ET AL -- rank: 460

... allowed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2a and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7. Thus, that case does not provide an interpretation of the ...

docket:	a6822-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-20
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 498
Document Size:	29263

26 ALICIA ORTIZ v. PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 408

... from receiving PIP benefits under Lourdes's policy with defendant. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b) permits an insurer to exclude from benefits 'any person ... permit her to drive the vehicle within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b). See Martin v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co., 346 N ...

docket:	a4190-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9043

27 DIANE FAILACH v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION -- rank: 332

... did not provide coverage for plaintiff's PIP claims, as N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7 provides an exclusion from providing PIP coverage to "a member ...

docket:	a5363-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	24377

28 ROSARIO AGUIRRE v. IFA INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 306

... conclude that the Legislature, by omitting a geographic reference in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7, did not contain any geographic restrictions. In the course of ...

docket:	a5468-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:	198 N.J. 473
Document Size:	43053