Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. RICHARD J. KOPECKY, M&A VALLEY TRANSPORTATION, RLI INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 566

... because they were insured by RLI, and the relevant statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, only permits recovery of PIP benefits from the insurer. The ... 25, 2006, the date the statute of limitations expired. II N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides: An insurer . . . paying . . . personal injury protection benefits . . . as a ... statute only permits recovery from the insurer in that circumstance. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 states that when relief is sought against an insured tortfeasor ... have the effect of tolling the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. We agree that the February 6 letter, even if it ... filing of a claim for PIP benefits does not satisfy N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. N.J. Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'n v. Liberty ... was therefore insufficient to toll the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides two means of securing reimbursement for PIP payments: ...

docket:	A3792-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37527

47 HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY VS BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS & MONMOUTH COUNTY JOINT INSURANCE FUND -- rank: 562

... County Joint Insurance Fund (JIF) to submit to arbitration under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 for reimbursement of Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits it paid ... mandatory purchase of motor vehicle insurance coverage such as PIP, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, a PIP provider which seeks statutory reimbursement of payments to ... could exercise the statutory right of direct reimbursement provided by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. Reviewing the history of reimbursement litigation and corrective legislation, in ... must continue to remain applicable to direct actions brought under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1.     Accordingly we affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth in ... reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 1997). Footnote: 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides in pertinent part:          An insurer . . . paying . . . personal injury protection ...

docket:	a5641-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-02
status:	published
citation:	310 N.J.Super. 599
Document Size:	10516

48 STATE FARM GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 559

... 2014, filed a complaint under 2 A-3749-16T 3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, seeking reimbursement of the PIP benefits from Hereford, the insurer ... subsections of the Insurance Act. The Commissioner did not include N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, the subsection governing PIP benefit reimbursement arbitration, in the scope ...

docket:	a3749-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-14
status:	published
citation:	454 N.J.Super. 1 183 A.3d 946
Document Size:	41265

49 21ST CENTURY PINNACLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. A.C. WINGS, LLC -- rank: 559

... Company, seeking reimbursement of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 (Section 9.1), that it paid to its insureds for ... 23, 2017 order granting plaintiff's application and compelling arbitration. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 creates a statutory right of reimbursement for PIP insurers against ... the involved parties or, upon failing to agree, by arbitration. [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1.] 2 A-4801-16T3 This provision helps promote an important ...

docket:	a4801-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15056

50 IFA INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN TRUCKING & TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 559

... American Trucking seeking reimbursement and requesting binding arbitration, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. 1 American Trucking filed an answer in which it raised ... negligence principles, the arbitrator concluded that IFA's "claim under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 [wa]s for reimbursement and not a subrogation claim and ... was aware of any legal support for her position that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 "requires a finding of comparative negligence or no comparative negligence ... we noted that "arbitration between two insurance companies, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, does not raise the public policy considerations that warrant broader ... s argument on this point is without merit. Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides, in pertinent part that [a]n insurer . . . paying . . . [PIP ...

docket:	a1845-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24150

51 JOSHUA HAINES v. JACOB W TAFT -- rank: 554

... as may be required in an action brought pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1], evidence of the amounts collectible or paid under a standard ...

docket:	a5503-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	52745

52 ENDO SURGICAL CENTER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 549

... PIP reimbursement from the tortfeasor's liability carrier pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. Nor are we concerned with a priority of payment issue ...

docket:	a2146-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44703

53 AAA MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. SWSNUJ WAREHOUSING INC -- rank: 542

... S.A. 39:6A-2(a), AAA was authorized by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 to seek reimbursement from SWSNUJ for the PIP benefits it ... Thereafter, AAA filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. Defendants Navigator and SWSNUJ opposed the motion and filed a ... whether the complaint seeking reimbursement was timely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, which states in pertinent part: An insurer . . . paying [PIP] benefits ... form that triggers the two-year limitations period contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1." Id. at 400. We discern no reason to depart from ...

docket:	a2043-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12131

54 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY FIRST RISK RETENTION GROUP -- rank: 542

... sought reimbursement for those payments from First Risk pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. 1 See Sherman v. Garcia Const., Inc. , 251 N.J ... 59 (App. Div. 1994) (explaining statutory cause of action under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 allows a PIP carrier, such as Liberty Mutual, a reimbursement ... binding arbitration."). Although acknowledging that it was obligated, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, to arbitrate Liberty Mutual's claim for additional PIP payments ... PIP payments, the two-year statute of limitations, contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, was no longer a factor. Waiver of the right to ... that First Risk had already agreed to arbitrate. Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides, in pertinent part that a. An insurer . . . paying . . . [ ...

docket:	a3401-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18821

55 ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. TRANS WARE, INC. -- rank: 535

... Singletary and RLI also argued that Encompass was precluded by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 from seeking recovery from the parties insured under the RLI ...

docket:	a4853-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17948

56 MARIA PERREIRA et al. v. MICHAEL C. REDIGER t/a MCR HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES and THE PRESERVER INSURANCE COMPANY, as insurer for Michael C. Rediger t/a Horticultural Enterprises, -- rank: 525

... N.J. 500 (1994). With respect to subrogation, the statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, is specific. The provider of PIP benefits may recover its ...

docket:	a4621-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-04-25
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	28347

57 MARIA PERREIRA et al. v. MICHAEL C. REDIGER t/a MCR HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES and THE PRESERVER INSURANCE COMPANY, as insurer for Michael C. Rediger t/a Horticultural Enterprises, -- rank: 523

... N.J. 500 (1994). With respect to subrogation, the statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, is specific. The provider of PIP benefits may recover its ...

docket:	a4281-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-04-25
status:	published
citation:	330 N.J.Super. 455
Document Size:	28159

58 MOLNAR V. HEDDEN -- rank: 508

... seeking reimbursement for its PIP payments, presumably as provided by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. Defendant, however, was never served with that complaint, so he ...

docket:	a-16-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-11-17
status:
citation:	138 N.J. 96
Document Size:	32459

59 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. INTERCOASTAL TRANSPORT COMPANY -- rank: 501

... by its policy and sought reimbursement from Star pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. 1 See Sherman v. Garcia Const., Inc. , 251 N.J ... company arbitration through Arbitration Forums, Inc. (Arbitration Forums) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 was unopposed. Accordingly, the Law Division ordered the parties to ... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1b. Reversed. 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 provides, in pertinent part that a. An insurer . . . paying . . . [PIP ...

docket:	a5268-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18271

60 GEICO v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 493

... n Workers of Am., 154 N.J. 98, 112 (1998)). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1(b) states: In the case of an accident occurring in ... not be recovered from the insured tortfeasor's personal assets. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1(b). Here, the tortfeasor settled with the injured parties with ...

docket:	a1227-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20108