Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 Gary Potenzone v. Annin Flag Company, et als. -- rank: 401

... liability policy insofar as its liability would be limited by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 -- a result that finds no justification in the self-insurance ... limited by the “minimum amounts of compulsory insurance mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1.” Id. at 414 (internal quotation marks omitted). In the present ...

docket:	a-54-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-06-06
status:
citation:	191 N.J. 147
Document Size:	29366

92 ATLANTIC STATES GROUP, et al. v. LAWRENCE SKOVRON, et al. -- rank: 397

... accordance with "the omnibus clause of the policy required by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1" and the "initial permission rule" adopted in Matits v. Nationwide ...

docket:	a3392-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-02-24
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	55841

93 GAP, INC v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 397

... its store at the time Otero was injured. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 requires insurers of registered vehicles in New Jersey to provide ...

docket:	a0593-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42514

94 PATRICIA A. HANCO et al. v. ROWELA A. SISOUKRAJ, -- rank: 394

... Div. 1993), that as a result of the adoption of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 the statute must be read as incorporating the $15,000 ...

docket:	A2836-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-11-07
status:	published
citation:	364 N.J. Super. 41 834 A.2d 443
Document Size:	18857

95 YDALIBIS RAMIREZ v. BERNARDO GALVAN MARTINEZ, AUDIBERTO MUNOZ-MUNOZ, NJ PROPERTY LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION AND PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE COMPANY - NADIUSKA J. KELLY AND YASMELY SEGUNDO v. HIGH POINT PROPERTY CASUALTY COM -- rank: 392

... statute. Both N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 require owners of vehicles used on public roads to carry ...

docket:	a1478-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38105

96 CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. VINCENT F. MAIORANO -- rank: 387

... automobile policy. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. The judge also concluded that Maiorano was liable for damages ...

docket:	a0469-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40380

97 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANNA KRONFELD -- rank: 382

... Jersey must carry liability insurance in specified minimum recovery amounts, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, and any person who operates a motor vehicle on the ...

docket:	A1535-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-11-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36508

98 JOHN MANTZOURANIS v. JUAN PRATOLONGO -- rank: 373

... accordance with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 requires coverage in the amount of no less than $15 ...

docket:	a2498-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40837

99 Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association -- rank: 368

... 3 of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 of the Compulsory Motor Vehicle Insurance Act.     At the conclusion ... only to the extent of its compulsatory insurance required by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. Both of those statutory provisions contain identical language: "every owner ...

docket:	a-135-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-06-11
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 323
Document Size:	16726

100 VIACHESLAV FETISOV, et al. v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 363

... liability coverage in Michigan) for motor vehicles. See , e.g. , N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 (use of motor vehicles) and Mich. Comp. Laws § 500 ...

docket:	A0828-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55509

101 Jaquez v. National Continental Ins. Co. -- rank: 354

... in New Jersey is required to maintain liability insurance coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. Although the law contains no statutory limitation on coverage based ...

docket:	a-74-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-11-26
status:
citation:	178 N.J. 88
Document Size:	43767

102 RICHARD D. DIEHL VS CUMBERLAND MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. -- rank: 330

... of any . . . motor vehicle . . . owned or operated by . . . any insured ."      N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 requires every owner of a motor vehicle to insure against ...

docket:	a6421-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-01-09
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 231
Document Size:	17545

103 THERESA SEABRIDGE v. DISCOUNT AUTO, INC., et al. -- rank: 322

... vehicle to maintain liability insurance." Id. at 411. The statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a), referred to as the omnibus statute, mandated minimum coverage ...

docket:	A3237-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-06-04
status:	published
citation:	393 N.J. Super. 327 923 A.2d 307
Document Size:	21040

104 EMPIRE FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHN BENNETT, JR., et al. -- rank: 320

... 420-21, which in this case is $15,000, see N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. This required minimum coverage was provided through the primary liability ...

docket:	A2277-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32768

105 JACQUELINE KISSEL v. REPOSSESSION SPECIALISTS, INC -- rank: 232

... deprives creditors and repossessors of the insurance coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). Appellant argues that the only authorized exception from mandatory ...

docket:	a4566-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15414