Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:55d-42")   16 to 30 of 41 results. Run time: 0.427 seconds | Search time: 0.423 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 11
16 IN THE MATTER ADOPTION OF N.J.A.C. 5:94 AND 5:95 BY THE NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING -- rank: 605
Original Wordprocessor Version This case can also be found at 390 N.J. Super. 1 or 914 A.2d 348. (NOTE: The status of this decision is Published .) (NOTE: The status of this decision is published .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION                             SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ...
docket: A2706-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-01-25
status: published
citation: 390 N.J. Super. 1 914 A.2d 348
Document Size: 190664
17 HYER Builders, LLC v. Township OF Middletown Planning Board -- rank: 551
... c)(2) variance. In support of this claim, plaintiff cited N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, which states that The governing body may by ordinance adopt ... Avenue rather than just the pro-rata share required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, it would be providing a benefit to the entire community ...
docket: a1644-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-10-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35101
18 TOLL BROS., INC., et al. v. LAUREL CREEK, L.L.P. -- rank: 548
... tract improvements and subject to the reasonable relationship test of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42. We disagree. Originally, streets abutting a proposed development were treated as subject to the limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 permitting "reasonable and necessary street improvements . . . necessitated or required by ... Centerton Road, whether authorized as an off-tract improvement by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 or as an off-tract improvement authorized by N.J ...
docket: A1248-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-09-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 63703
19 TOLL BROS., INC., et al. v. LAUREL CREEK, L.L.P. -- rank: 548
... tract improvements and subject to the reasonable relationship test of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42. We disagree. Originally, streets abutting a proposed development were treated as subject to the limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 permitting "reasonable and necessary street improvements . . . necessitated or required by ... Centerton Road, whether authorized as an off-tract improvement by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 or as an off-tract improvement authorized by N.J ...
docket: A1247-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-09-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 63702
20 HACKENSACK RIVERKEEPER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 548
... for off-tract improvements is limited." Id. at 453 (citing N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 ("referring to contributions for off-tract improvements to water, sewer ...
docket: a1752-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-12-22
status: published
citation: 443 N.J.Super. 293 128 A.3d 749
Document Size: 63519
21 WALTERS DEVELOPMENT CO LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF BARNEGAT -- rank: 545
... of its construction costs for well 6 was based on N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, which is part of the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL ... 60 N.J. 115 , 132 (1972). The Court recognized that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 "provides the boundaries of a public entity's power with ... portion attributed to future users of the Water Facilities. 5 N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 states in part: The governing body may by ordinance adopt ...
docket: a3899-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-08-22
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 54412
22 POND RUN WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -- rank: 545
... was an illegal exaction. The court relied in part upon N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, which specifically limits off-tract monetary contributions by developers under ...
docket: A1022-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-01-10
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 83628
23 FAIR SHARE HOUSING CENTER INC v. THE ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 537
... authorized zoning power under the MLUL. However, their reliance on N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 for this proposition is misplaced. That statute involves general contributions ...
docket: a1499-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-09-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 80622
24 IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK FOR A JUDGMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF ITS THIRD ROUND HOUSING ELEMENT AND FAIR SHARE PLAN HIDDEN OAKS WOODS, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK and TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 508
... Rizas, 132 N.J. 509, 518 (1993). In accordance with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, 'a developer, as a condition for approval of a . . . site ...
docket: a3115-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-07-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 45268
25 HERRONTOWN WOODS CITIZENS ASSOCIATION v. REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD OF PRINCETON -- rank: 508
... not required to provide sewer service to the proposed development. N .J.S.A. 40:55D-42 authorizes municipalities, by ordinance, to require a developer, as a ...
docket: a1820-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-01
status: unpublished
citation: 197 N.J. 259 962 A.2d 530
Document Size: 67706
26 GINSBURG DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES L.L.C v. TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON -- rank: 502
... of condition in light of changed circumstances is related to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42, which permits a governing body to require "a developer, as ... developer's contribution to off site improvements as required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...
docket: a6129-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-09-21
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28918
27 DANIEL J. ROE v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MONTVALE -- rank: 491
... fees and expenses incurred by the Borough in this litigation. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 states: The governing body may by ordinance adopt regulations requiring ...
docket: a3564-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62502
28 RAE SHIM & WASHINGTON WINES & LIQUORS, INC., ET AL., VS WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD & TRENTON SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH -- rank: 488
... S.A. 40:55D-38, -39 and -41. But see N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42 (municipality may, by ordinance, require applicant to pay pro - rata ...
docket: a4689-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-03-11
status: published
citation: 298 N.J.Super. 395
Document Size: 46323
29 IN THE MATTER OF CAPE MAY COUNTY/ERNEST AND JANICE UTSCH AND ANNA MAY LETTS FARM -- rank: 482
... the cost of which is to be prorated pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42]." Importantly, Lower Township Ordinance Section 400-8 expressly defines a ...
docket: a1997-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51884
30 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3164-19.opn.html -- rank: 482
... approval upon a contribution to necessary off-site street improvements. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-42. But the authority to prohibit or limit uses generating traffic ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 45160
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 11
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!