Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:55d-62.1")   16 to 30 of 44 results. Run time: 0.442 seconds | Search time: 0.439 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 14
16 JOHN M. CARBONE v. BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON -- rank: 794
... 2. 4 In particular, plaintiffs contended that, in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, which requires that public notice of certain amendments to a ... to the zoning ordinance "to comport with the intent of [ N.J.S.A. ] 40:55D-62.1." In short, the judge determined that adoption of the ordinance ... Plaintiffs also argue the notice itself did not comply with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, because it did not sufficiently describe the affected properties. We ... shall be the responsibility of the proponent of the amendment. [ N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 (Emphasis added).] N.J.S.A. 40:49-2(a ... ordinance. The purpose of the individualized notice requirements contained in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 is to give affected property owners notice of "discrete and ... properties included in the proposed SCR zone, in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. Plaintiffs contend that "dual descriptive methods . . . are required and ...
docket: a3744-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-09-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30488
17 JOSEPH COTLER, et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF PILESGROVE -- rank: 761
... MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -99. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 provides that any owner of property located within 200 feet ... resulted from a periodic general reexamination of the master plan. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and that the brief summary of the contents of the ... ordinance contained in the published notice did not comply with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. This section of the MLUL provides: Notice of a hearing ... scope of the exemption from the personal notice requirement of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and parallel provision of N.J.S.A. 40:55D ... involve public involvement resulting from the specific notice required by [ N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and 63]." Id. at 125. On the other hand, the ... without the personal notice to affected property owners required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and 63. Gallo , supra , 328 N.J. Super. at ...
docket: A0092-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-06-06
status: published
citation: 393 N.J. Super. 377 923 A.2d 338
Document Size: 47016
18 ANGELA AGAZZI v. GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF RED BANK -- rank: 758
... she did not challenge Ordinance 15. Rather, she argued that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 required personal notice of proposed Ordinance 17 to all property ... and that personal notice to property owners in accordance with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 should have been given prior to its adoption. He further ... Plaintiff argues, as she did before the trial court, that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 required the Borough to serve personal notice of proposed Ordinance ... of the district which is the subject of the hearing. [ N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1.] Here, it is undisputed that Ordinance 17 was not adopted ... s classification and thereby triggered the personal notice provision of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. "Unlike many terms found in the MLUL, 'classification' is not ... personal notice of proposed Ordinance 17 was not mandated by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, as the trial court correctly concluded. Like the trial ...
docket: a4199-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-01-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41679
19 CORRINE GALLO, JOSEPH GALLO et al. v. MAYOR and TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP, LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP et al. -- rank: 744
... to the protest provisions of the Municipal Land Use Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and -63, provide for notice of zoning classification and boundary ... that defendants failed to comply with the notice requirements of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and -63, and that the adoption of the LUO constituted ... 63. See footnote 3 3 (We focus our attention on N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, which requires similar notice when there is a proposed amendment ... On the other hand, the master plan review envisioned by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and N.J.S.A. 40:55D-63. In both ...
docket: a2235-98
court: njappellate
decided: 2000-02-10
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 27960
20 WILLIAM M. CAMPBELL v. BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD -- rank: 735
... also enacted in its entirety what has been codified as N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, s ee L. 1995, c. 249, § 2, as an all ... those districts. Id. at 329-33. At the same time, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 was enacted, s ee L. 1995, c. 249, §2, establishing ...
docket: a0526-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-12-24
status: published
citation: 404 N.J.Super. 337 961 A.2d 770
Document Size: 84009
21 DONALD NUCKEL v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY -- rank: 727
... proposed ordinance was given to the public, in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and the case law interpreting that and similar land use ... the notice did not comply with all the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and also did not use plain language to state the ... public of the nature and purpose of the proposed ordinance. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 provides, in pertinent part: Notice of a hearing on an ... with the properties located to the south of Route 46 . . . . N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 requires that a notice include "street names, common names or ...
docket: a0673-13
court: superior court trial
decided: 2015-02-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62104
22 DONALD NUCKEL v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY -- rank: 727
... proposed ordinance was given to the public, in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and the case law interpreting that and similar land use ... the notice did not comply with all the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 and also did not use plain language to state the ... public of the nature and purpose of the proposed ordinance. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 provides, in pertinent part: Notice of a hearing on an ... with the properties located to the south of Route 46 . . . . N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 requires that a notice include "street names, common names or ...
docket: a0672-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-02-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62209
23 EAST WINDSOR GROUP, LLC v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER -- rank: 719
... AND MOTELS WERE ADDED AS A CONDITIONAL USE PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 AND THE HOTEL STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS WERE CHANGED. POINT [II ... 97 S. Ct. 1672 , 52 L. Ed.2d 373 (1977)). N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 provides in pertinent part: Notice of a hearing on an ... for its failure to include the personal notice requirement under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. It was not required in this case. Moreover, the testimony ... change to the classification or boundaries of a zoning district." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. We have previously interpreted the word "classification," as used under ... character of the zone to trigger the notice provision of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. We likewise reject plaintiffs' contention that the published notice in ...
docket: a6230-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-09-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29875
24 MARY ANNE DALESSIO v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DEERFIELD -- rank: 705
... pointing out that plaintiffs received ten days notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. In relevant part, the requirement provides that "[n]otice of ... than its compliance with the ten-day notice requirement of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. Ibid. We also disagree with plaintiffs' argument that they did ... dispute that they received ten days notice in compliance with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. Finally, plaintiffs argue that the Township's attorney misadvised the ...
docket: a3128-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-12-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37120
25 VILLAGE SUPERMARKETS INC v. TOWNSHIP OF EGG HARBOR -- rank: 702
... that Ordinances 21 2011 and 22 2011 did not trigger N.J.S.A. 40:55D 62.1's personal-notice requirements, since they did not fundamentally alter ... AND OTHER ZONES THEREBY TRIGGERING THE PERSONAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 POINT THREE ORDINANCE 15-2011 (AND ORDINANCE 13-3010) ARE ... Township did not comply with the personal notice requirement of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1: Notice of a hearing on an amendment to the zoning ... classification in the RCD zone, thereby requiring personal notice per N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. ShopRite relies upon Robert James Pacilli Homes v. Township of ...
docket: a5370-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-04-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52177
26 ELITE DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. MAYOR and COUNCIL of the TOWN OF KEARNY, et al. -- rank: 682
... the ordinances were enacted without public notice as required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. We affirm. We briefly summarize the relevant procedural history and ... adopted without providing notice to affected property owners pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. The judge also found that, had statutory notice been provided ... by order filed March 2, 2005. The MLUL provides in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 that: Notice of a hearing on an amendment to the ... 2004-(0)-12 were adopted without providing notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. On this appeal, defendants argue that: 1) the ordinances were ... master plan; and 2) proper notice was effectuated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 in the enactment of the ordinances. We have carefully considered ... to the zoning ordinance was not provided as required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. We therefore affirm substantially for the reasons stated by ...
docket: A2911-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-01-11
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 38166
27 KATARZYNA KRICKOVIC v. BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER -- rank: 648
... the proposed zoning changes to property owners in accordance with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. The statute provides that notice of proposed changes to classifications ... of the proposed new boundaries of the districts. Ibid. However, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 also states that such notice need not be provided when ...
docket: a0821-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30243
28 JAMIE A. GRIFFIN and KENNETH WARFIELD v. BARNEGAT TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE -- rank: 648
... as owners of neighboring properties to personal notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1. In support of this argument, plaintiffs relied on Pacilli . Notwithstanding ... Pa cilli announced a new rule, we look first to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, which Pacilli interpreted. In declaring when personal notice is required, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 states: [n]otice of a hearing on an amendment to ... J. Super. at 331. Accordingly, we held in Pacilli that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 required personal notice to those persons whose property was within ... Pacilli represents the first clear determination of the scope of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1, and, thus, must be recognized as having announced a new ...
docket: a6221-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-10-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41101
29 NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL TOWNSHIP OF EDISON -- rank: 643
... regulations involving property within 200 feet of an adjoining municipality); N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1 (notice of hearings on proposed changes in zoning districts). Moreover ...
docket: a6490-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-02-02
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 31787
30 VISHNU REDDY v. MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 637
... a); (2) Ordinance 20- 2021 was invalid for insufficient notice, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-62.1; (3) Ordinance 20-2021 was invalid as improper spot zoning ...
docket: a3575-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-06-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50458
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 14
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!