Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 JOHNSON BARAN CORP v. OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS -- rank: 467

... relevant statutory provisions of the Local Public Contracts Law (LPCL) ( N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 et seq .) and the relevant case law to determine whether ...

docket:	a3979-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27696

92 IN THE MATTER OF THE FAILURE TO AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER RFP 09-X-20513 CONTRACT T0002 -- rank: 462

... these particular cases arose under the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -51 and not under the State bidding laws, N ...

docket:	a2747-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37626

93 MUIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. ESSEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY et al. -- rank: 449

... was not a properly licensed "plumbing contractor" as defined by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to-50, is to promote competitive bids "'to secure for ...

docket:	A1168-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2000-12-27
status:	published
citation:	336 N.J. Super. 126
Document Size:	23589

94 SILVER OAKS PROPERTIES, INC v. BOROUGH OF MATAWAN -- rank: 444

... in violation of the New Jersey Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -51, and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, for ...

docket:	a3253-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48190

95 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 A-0 SHT CORP., t/a SOMERSET -- rank: 410

... public contracts. "The purpose of the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -50, is to promote competitive bids 'to secure for ...

docket:	a0308-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25423

96 RENCOR INC. v. NORTH HUDSON SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, et al. -- rank: 407

... basis that the standards of the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -51, had been violated. We affirm. The "Solids and ...

docket:	A1425-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35886

97 BRUCE KAPLAN v. TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE -- rank: 384

... it violated certain requirements of the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -51. That act limits to a "term of not ...

docket:	a2703-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31569

98 SERENITY CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., VS THE BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, ET AL -- rank: 322

... on the project pursuant to the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -49, and that, despite Serenity's low bid, the ...

docket:	a2590-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-12-12
status:	published
citation:	306 N.J.Super. 151
Document Size:	24870

99 LAW OFFICES OF GOLD, ALBANESE, BARLETTI & VELAZQUEZ v. JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, et al. -- rank: 298

... recover would run afoul of the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -49. The trial court granted the Authority's motion ...

docket:	A0875-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37179

100 INTER-REGIONAL DISPOSAL & RECYCLING SERVICES et al. v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF NEWARK, et al. -- rank: 275

... garden-variety contract principles and the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -50 (LPCL). We hold that a public entity that ...

docket:	A3756-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50971

101 CIOFFI'S TOWING SERVICE, INC v. BOROUGH OF COLLINGSWOOD -- rank: 272

... at the very heart of the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-1 to -51, which was intended to encourage competition and to ...

docket:	a2893-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36105