Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC. v. COUNTY OF ESSEX -- rank: 509

... the rejection of all proposals pursuant to the provisions of [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d)]. On October 10, 2007, the Board of Freeholders ...

docket:	a2577-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-01-25
status:	published
citation:	411 N.J. Super. 378 986 A.2d 695
Document Size:	52237

17 FALASCA MECHANICAL, INC v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 488

... did not file a timely challenge to the specifications. See N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Moreover, if either appellant had questions about the bid specifications ...

docket:	a1872-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27941

18 FALASCA MECHANICAL, INC v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 488

... did not file a timely challenge to the specifications. See N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Moreover, if either appellant had questions about the bid specifications ...

docket:	a1757-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27933

19 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL INC v. CITY OF BAYONNE -- rank: 480

... by the City of Bayonne or its agents. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13 and Section 6.9 of the Bid Specifications, Bayonne provided ... prospective bidders regarding their right to challenge bid specifications: Per N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, any prospective bidder who wishes to challenge a bid specification ...

docket:	a0667-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24880

20 FREDCO LANDSCAPING LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE -- rank: 472

... it could have objected to the late service pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, which requires that any bidder who wishes to challenge a ...

docket:	a3082-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15401

21 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF AWARD OF NEW JERSEY STATE CONTRACT A71188 FOR LIGHT DUTY AUTOMOTIVE PARTS -- rank: 450

... Court interpreted a recent amendment to a public contract statute, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, as adding a limitations period for challenging specifications issued in ...

docket:	a5626-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-04-14
status:	published
citation:	422 N.J. Super. 275 28 A.3d 816
Document Size:	69916

22 A&A INDUSTRIAL PIPING, INC v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC and KAPPA CONSTRUCTION CORP - -- rank: 427

... this contract constituted a substantial revision of the specifications under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d), entitling it to reject all bids in the ...

docket:	a0978-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18314

23 CETCO CONTRACTING SERVICES COMPANY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 366

... the "purposes or provisions" of the LPCL are being violated. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(c), (d) and (e). Here, the trial court found ...

docket:	a6116-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25316

24 CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS L.L.C v. COUNTY OF HUDSON -- rank: 363

... contract pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-12]. [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2.] Although the right to reject all bids "serves an ...

docket:	a3943-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44874