Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 ANDREW R. SOUTH v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 490

... weeks ending April 11, 2009, through July 25, 2009. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. On August 27, 2009, the Deputy Director ... benefits when not entitled is obliged to repay those sums, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), even if he received them in good faith. See ...

docket:	a4348-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15395

107 CAROLINA LEAL DEHAQUIZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 487

... benefits she received, she is required to repay those benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The obligation to repay is unaffected by the ...

docket:	a2999-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14505

108 HONOREE M. GIBNEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KELLY SERVICES, INC -- rank: 478

... all benefits received by Gibney was sought in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), which provides in pertinent part: When it is ...

docket:	a2280-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	21406

109 IRENE BRENNAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 475

... the unemployment compensation statute requires repayment of any benefits received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Recoupment of "unemployment benefits received by an individual ... the benefits, but she is still required to repay them. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). She has failed to put forth any ground ...

docket:	a1295-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12589

110 DALE J. ECKENSBERGER SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 472

... the amount of $24,676 he had received pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... other reasons while the person was not eligible for benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The Director is permitted to provide a waiver of ...

docket:	a6241-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10964

111 ROSA CECILIA RODRIGUEZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 469

... is later determination the claimant was not entitled to receive. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Repayment of such overpayments is also required where ... charged here. In Bannan v. Board of Review , we stated: N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a5881-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14335

112 FRANHEL AMARO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 460

... doubt that, absent an exception justifying waiver, the unemployment statute, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), requires full repayment of benefits received by an individual ...

docket:	a3579-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16692

113 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 460

... benefits, she was required to reimburse that sum, $834. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.3 ...

docket:	a2773-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

114 MARY ROMANCIO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 460

... ending November 29, 2008, through July 10, 2010. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) generally requires that persons who have received unemployment compensation ...

docket:	a1880-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20846

115 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 460

... benefits, she was required to reimburse that sum, $834. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.3 ...

docket:	a2774-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

116 LORI HEWITT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL, INC -- rank: 451

... regardless of whether she accepted them in good faith. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d); Bannan v. Bd. of Review, 299 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a3795-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11784

117 LUBOMIR JANECEK v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 445

... ordered Janecek to refund $5,600 in benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), for the ten weeks he received benefits when he ... The Division also assessed a fine of $1,400 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). Janecek appealed the Director's determinations to the Appeal ...

docket:	a0778-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8834

118 LUCILLE GABEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THREE STAR TOURS, INC -- rank: 442

... the work and because of this, she was required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) to refund the benefits she had received. A-3604 ...

docket:	a3604-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15377

119 JAINARINE LALBACHAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and APIDEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC -- rank: 432

... in benefits he received but was not entitled to keep. N.J.S.A 43:21-16(d). The Board affirmed the Appellate Tribunal on the basis ...

docket:	a4800-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11680

120 NAIDA A. FRAZIER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and RITE AID OF NEW JERSEY, INC -- rank: 432

... regulation, shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d).] In Bannan v. Board of Review , 299 N.J ... elapsed from the time the benefits in question were paid." N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.1 ...

docket:	a0262-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-02-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11942