Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 RICHARD J. AMABILE v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 408

... for a refund in the amount of $611 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ...

docket:	a5792-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15011

137 JEFFREY A. PEREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 408

... he had to refund the benefits he received, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The Board affirmed the Tribunal's decision on December ...

docket:	a2352-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11342

138 ANGELINA M. CARLOMAGNO v. BOARD OF REVIEW and CHECKPOINT H.R., LLC -- rank: 408

... require her to repay the unemployment benefits she previously received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) provides that “any person . . . [who] has received any ...

docket:	a2956-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20781

139 JAMES K. REILLY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 405

... notice and an opportunity to be heard. Id. at 583. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) provides that the determination of the Board "shall be ...

docket:	a0911-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18931

140 K.H v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DENNIS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 402

... Rev., 123 N.J. Super. 263, 266 (App. Div. 1973)) (' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a3110-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12843

141 SIMONETTE TUCKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and NURSE STAFFERS, INC -- rank: 402

... or apply for suitable work without good cause, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The Division also issued a request for refund totaling ...

docket:	a3237-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	8593

142 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2146-18.opn.html -- rank: 399

... was not eligible to receive these benefits and, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), was required to refund the $1,908. The Director ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	7433

143 REYNAE E. MILLER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 399

... prior work period."). The refund was requested in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which provides in pertinent part: When it is determined ...

docket:	a3584-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14302

144 FRANKLIN BROOKS, JR. v. BOARD OF REVIEW and SIERRA SALES COMPANY, INC. -- rank: 396

... person . . . shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] Here, the determination that Brooks was ineligible for ...

docket:	A3970-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24392

145 FRANKLIN BROOKS, JR. v. BOARD OF REVIEW and SIERRA SALES COMPANY, INC. -- rank: 396

... person . . . shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] Here, the determination that Brooks was ineligible for ...

docket:	A2027-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24392

146 GENERA ALICEA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 393

... for any determination made on or before December 1, 2010. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Late filing can be excused only upon a ...

docket:	a4163-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-28
status:	published
citation:	432 N.J.Super. 347 74 A.3d 1004
Document Size:	24756

147 AMY B. WEINBERGER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 390

... 2, 2010, she was ordered to refund those benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). She was not accused of fraud in the receipt ...

docket:	a3563-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11279

148 ROBIN CARBONE v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 390

... for the repayment of $850 in benefits received, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d). In adhering to our limited standard of review,1 ...

docket:	a5242-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9333

149 JOHN BUSTARD, ET AL v. BOARD OF REVIEW and JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY -- rank: 390

... of benefits received to be determined administratively "in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)." To reach its decision, the Board reversed a contrary ...

docket:	a5365-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-07-15
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 383
Document Size:	21862

150 LARISA SLUTSKAYA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HHCH HEALTH CARE, INC -- rank: 390

... 368 , 376 (1978)). "Rather than being jurisdictional, the notice statute, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), serves to implement or execute the due process protections ...

docket:	a1588-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27005