Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 AMINATA M. KOROMA v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. and SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S -- rank: 731

... benefits of $6500 and a penalty of $1625, authorized under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(a)(1). After claimant appealed, the Appeal Tribunal remanded to ... she shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). If a false representation has been made, the ... impose a 'fine of 25% of the amount fraudulently obtained.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1). The substantial credible evidence in the record supports ...

docket:	a4092-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8419

17 FRANSCISCA RAMIREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EXECUTIVE HOME CARE, LLC -- rank: 725

... 43:21- 5(c), and liable to repay $4500 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The Board dismissed the appeal for lateness pursuant to ...

docket:	a3755-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31235

18 ROBERT J. DURISH v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 722

... the person is liable to repay those benefits in full. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the Board's decision in ...

docket:	a5744-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25665

19 MORGAN N. FARREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 713

... 2059-21 5 Tribunal further determined claimant was liable under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) to refund the $7,105 in benefits she received ... t of Env't Prot., 191 N.J. 38, 3 N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) 'requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a2059-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26772

20 RAUL R. DACOSTA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 710

... decision of the Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) finding, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), that DaCosta was liable to repay $40,880 previously ... DaCosta had received while unable to work, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). On October 19, 2011, DaCosta requested a full waiver ... regulation, shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (internal citations omitted).] Where such repayment is required ... was liable for the repayment of his unemployment benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Moreover, the Board's decision not to grant ...

docket:	a1574-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22219

21 MIRON FAYNERMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 710

... ending December 9, 2012 through June 8, 2013 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The Director's request was based on a determination ... 12/9/12 through 6/8/13, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) unless the Director directs otherwise in accordance with N ... New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law (UCL) has consistent provisions. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(2)(B). Because Faynerman was ineligible to receive EUC ...

docket:	a5019-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34766

22 ZOE HARRIS-HOHNE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, -- rank: 704

... regardless of the reason for the overpayment in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d).' The Director informed petitioner that if she disagreed with ...

docket:	a3121-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20957

23 MARCO DIGIOVANNI VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET AL. -- rank: 698

... was liable to refund the $9,128 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). DiGiovanni appealed that decision to the Board. On July ... appropriately considered the totality of the circumstances involving DiGiovanni. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), a claimant must refund benefits to the Unemployment Compensation ... person . . . shall be liable to repay those benefits in full.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (2014) (amended 2023). Repayment is required even if ...

docket:	a4029-21
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16093

24 NELSON P. BALBOA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 695

... benefits would "be determined by the Director in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)." Balboa denies he received notice of the Board's ... to the Board's prior decision. The Tribunal relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... 299 N.J. Super. 671 , 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). However, the issue before us is whether Balboa ... s liability for the refund was therefore established pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Id. at 60. The Board affirmed. Ibid. We reversed ...

docket:	a1500-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33752

25 CALEDA L. WOODS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 695

... A-1865-15T1 unemployment benefits inappropriately paid is authorized by N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which provides in pertinent part: When it is determined ... full amount of benefits received because the plain language of N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d) provides a claimant can be made obligated to pay ... 531. 7 A-1865-15T1 Thus, we believe that subsection [N.J.S.A. 43:21-16](d), which is found in a provision entitled 'Penalties', is ... truthful report of his income. That the other subsections of N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16 also provide separately for some penalty, rather than indicating the ... review, despite the Director's exclusive authority in this area. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... intent for overpaid unemployment benefits to be repaid in full. N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d)(1).4 In this matter, the Board's ...

docket:	a1865-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20101

26 JOSEPH A. KNOEBL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC -- rank: 692

... dis­covering the error, has a right to recoup benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Affirmed. 1 The statute was amended, effective July ...

docket:	a3560-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32076

27 DONNA B. ESSICK v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and EQUITY COMMUNICATIONS, L.P -- rank: 689

... 17-6.2(b). We also are convinced that under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d),4 she was required to refund the benefits she ... meritorious challenge to the Board's order that she 4 N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) provides for recovery of benefits paid to an ...

docket:	a3680-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15597

28 S.M. v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and LIBERTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATES -- rank: 689

... 43:21-5(a), it also determined that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), she could be subjected to a demand for a ...

docket:	a4243-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29846

29 JAMES A. PETERS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 685

... 570 in overpaid unemployment insurance benefits, including fines, pursuant to N.J.S.A . 43:21-16(d) and N.J.S.A . 43:21-16(a). The demand for refund followed an investigation by the ... that Peters committed fraud was not refuted at the hearing. N.J.S.A . 43:21-16(d)(1) states: When it is determined . . . that any person ... Peters therefore was properly held liable for repayment. In addition, N.J.S.A . 43:21-16(a) provides for the imposition of fines for making false ...

docket:	a1451-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17179

30 GREGORY M. D'AGOSTINO JR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 679

... D'Agostino must refund $1752 in unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... fraudulent representations, and must pay a $438 fine pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). We affirm. D'Agostino filed a claim for unemployment ... s decision that D'Agostino must refund $1752 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... 21-5(g)(1), and fine him $438 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). The Board agreed with the Appeal Tribunal's decision ...

docket:	a5422-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14554