Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 SAMEER DHAWAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 673

... Tribunal also affirmed the Director's refund request, based on N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which authorizes the collection of refunds when, for any ...

docket:	a5924-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22931

32 JUDITH M. CASAZZA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and PORTER GOLDBERG AND MARTIN -- rank: 673

... work. He also determined that Casazza was liable pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) to refund the benefits she had been erroneously paid ...

docket:	a6057-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20744

33 PARIS E. ARMWOOD v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 670

... of Unemployment and Disability (Director) held Armwood liable, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), for refunds of benefits paid after he falsely or ... in 2008, 2009 and 2010, fined him as authorized by N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) and disqualified him pursuant to N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a4338-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12193

34 ALAN R. WITTE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 661

... and that he must pay back the benefits he received, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Witte appealed to the Appeals Tribunal, which, after a ... at most, an honest mistake. We must reject this contention. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) provides that a person is liable to repay in ...

docket:	a2326-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15117

35 ANA Y. SOLER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 661

... a), was ineligible for unemployment compensation, and was required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) to refund amounts previously paid to her. After the ... benefits that were not rightfully due, they must be repaid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). This is so, even if the employee was acting ...

docket:	a6393-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49141

36 DIANE P. STINNEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 661

... Insurance found claimant liable for a refund of benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) because she had failed to report her earnings ... or fraudulent representation has been made, the penalties are harsh. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) provides that when a person has not disclosed ... she is liable to repay any benefits received in full. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) sets the additional fine to be imposed and N ...

docket:	a2740-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20375

37 KENNETH SHERRER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS -- rank: 652

... that he was obligated to refund unentitled benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Having considered the parties' arguments in light of the ... 93 N.J. Super. 451 , 457-58 (App. Div. 1967)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a2422-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18481

38 RICHARD A. COPLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LORD AND TAYLOR -- rank: 652

... benefits he received, he is required to repay those benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The obligation to repay is unaffected by the ...

docket:	a5677-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-21
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18541

39 MARVIN W. GREEN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 652

... he was employed. Green was also fined in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). On December 14, 2007, the Appeal Tribunal affirmed the ... App. Div. 1965), aff’d , 48 N.J. 121 (1966). N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) provides: When it is determined by a representative ... that he was not entitled to receive; as such, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), he is liable for a refund of $12 ... intended to defraud the Division -- which he vigorously denies -- as " N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ... As such, he is liable for the imposition of fines, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a), and disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits for a period ...

docket:	a3773-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16909

40 JEFFREY ZIEMBA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 640

... The Appeal Tribunal also determined appellant was liable, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), for a refund of $2628 in benefits paid. In ... refund $16,425 in paid benefits, the Appeal Tribunal applied N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d) and ruled appellant was obligated to refund the amount ... statutorily obligated 'to repay those [paid] benefits in full.' See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). We, therefore, affirm the Board's decisions affirming ...

docket:	a0051-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13963

41 MAXIM BASCH v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 640

... refers us to California case law, which is not applicable. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) generally 'requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a3390-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12024

42 PATRICIA WILHELM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS LLC -- rank: 640

... 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). If, however, the employee obtains benefits fraudulently, the ... Bd. of Review, 76 N.J. 527, 531 (1978) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)); (2) pay a fine equal to twenty-five percent of the amount fraudulently obtained, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1); and (3) be disqualified from receiving benefits for ... to a fine of 25% of the amount fraudulently obtained . . . . [N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1).] Accordingly, there are three essential elements to impose ...

docket:	a1524-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20141

43 GENADIY KISHINEVSKIY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON LEARNING CORPORATION -- rank: 637

... overpaid benefits, liable for a $1478.25 fine pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a), and disqualified from unemployment benefits from March 29, 2018 ... in benefits paid during the nine weeks as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d)(1), and pay a $1478.25 fine in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). The Appeal Tribunal also disqualified claimant from benefits for ... the benefits received during the nine weeks at issue. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1)(i) (providing a claimant 'shall be liable to ... liable to refund the full amount of benefits received because N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) provides that a claimant may be obligated to refund ...

docket:	a5649-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14734

44 ROBERTO HALAL v. BOARD OF REVIEW and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES INC -- rank: 634

... fraudulent representation[s]." Based on these findings, and relying on N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a), (d)(1), and -5(g)(1), 2 the appeals ... Bd. of Review , 76 N.J. 527 , 531 (1978) (interpreting N.J.S.A . 43:21-16(d)); see also N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (requiring the refund of any benefits paid to ineligible recipients); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) (providing for imposition of a fine); N.J.S ...

docket:	a2878-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24235

45 PHILLIP L. BURD v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 634

... was 'collected improperly' and had to be returned pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d). Burd appealed that determination. Although a hearing commenced before ... was liable to refund the amounts received as unemployment, citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). It did not address Burd's argument that his ... was correct to require these monies to be refunded under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d). Affirmed. A-0531-17T1 9 This archive is a ...

docket:	a0531-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16274