Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 FRANK E. CARUSO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE -- rank: 628

... Although the Court addressed the appeal period set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), its reasoning applies as well to those sections of ...

docket:	a5669-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14549

47 SVETLANA GIMPELEV v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP and DUSK TO DAWN CHAPERONES -- rank: 624

... a refund in the amount of $2,085 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- - 16(d). Petitioner appealed from the Appeal Tribunal's determination. In ... we affirm, the Division is constrained to seek refunds under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), which 'requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits ... Super. 263, 266 (App. Div. 1973)). Although refunds required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16 may impose a hardship on a claimant, they are 'necessary ...

docket:	a2159-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16860

48 JOANNA WISE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 624

... The New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law (UCL) has consistent provisions. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(2)(B). Wise argues that she is without fault ...

docket:	a0035-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17705

49 SUSAN MANLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 615

... refund $881 in benefits she received during her disqualification, see N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. Manley was employed by Metropolitan Plant Exchange ... benefits she received during the period of her disqualification. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Manley appealed. The Board initially ordered a remand for ... requiring that she refund the benefits paid during her disqualification. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) A-0118-17T4 7 requires that a claimant ... faith and without fault. It is well-settled, however, that ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a0118-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15507

50 NICOLE FREDERICKS v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and AUTHENTIDATE HOLDING CORP -- rank: 603

... decision that she is liable for a refund pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... through the week ending September 19, 2009, as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Appellant appealed to the Appeal Tribunal. Following a ... Tribunal's decision. This appeal followed. On appeal, appellant contends N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) does not apply because she cooperated and acted in ... while otherwise not entitled to receive such sum as benefits[.] [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] In Bannan v. Board of Review , we affirmed ... elapsed from the time the benefits in question were paid." N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); see also N.J.A.C. 12:17 ...

docket:	a6023-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18194

51 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1940-21.opn.html -- rank: 603

... the $5,601 in benefits he received while disqualified. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (providing in part that an individual who receives ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18206

52 LAURA WAGNER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 600

... with the Department of Labor. Affirmed. 2 The version of N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) in effect when the Board issued its decision required ... whether the error was on the part of the agency. N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d) (2017) (amended July 13, 2023). See also Bannan v ... 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674 (App. Div. 1997) (finding N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) 'require[d] the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a1065-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16453

53 WAYNE BYRD v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 597

... Benefits Comm'n , 373 N.J. Super. 408 , 415 (2004). N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) generally "requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ... of refunds reposes solely, exclusively and personally in the Director. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). [ Howard v. Bd. of Review , 173 N.J. Super. 196 , 202 (App. Div. 1980).] N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) contains language requiring repayment, "unless the director (with the ...

docket:	a4255-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20972

54 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3455-17.opn.html -- rank: 597

... must refund unemployment benefits he improperly received in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. We derive the following facts from the ... 5(b), nor liable for a refund of $4452 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). IFIC appealed the Appeal Tribunal's decision to the ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	13394

55 CELESTE A. LAMPLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 597

... of N.J.A.C. 12:17-8.2 and N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) vault Lampley's mistaken belief that her unemployment benefits ... she was not aware of nor responsible for bringing about. ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ... within four years after the benefits in question were paid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Further, N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ...

docket:	a2047-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16445

56 RAUL ACEVEDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 591

... failed to report his part-time earnings in violation of N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), which provides in pertinent part: When it is ... unemployment. He was also fined $2,496.75 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) for making false or fraudulent statements that he was not earning wages while he was receiving benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) (stating a fine may be imposed where a claimant ... Bd. of Review , 76 N.J. 527 , 531 (1978)  (interpreting N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)); cf. Orzel v. Bd. of Review , 386 N.J ...

docket:	a3355-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-13
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	14993

57 CAROL D. FAUST v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CUSTOM BENEFIT PROGRAMS, INC -- rank: 588

... division ordered Faust to repay the $16,416 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Faust appealed the deputy's and the director's ...

docket:	a3292-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-06
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20076

58 HENRY J. KOCH Claimant- v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and ENTEL SYSTEMS, INC - -- rank: 588

... 43:21-5(a), and liable for a refund under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). After a review of the contentions advanced on appeal ...

docket:	a1975-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23889

59 D.B.,1 v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 582

... September 26, 2020 through March 27, 2021, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. We discern the following facts from the ... ending September 26, 2020 through March 27, 2021, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). On April 26, 2021, appellant appealed the Deputy's ...

docket:	a2796-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14762

60 CLAUDETTE PARKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 582

... Director) mailed Parker a request for a refund pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), holding Parker liable to refund an overpayment in the ...

docket:	a2463-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-09-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15314