Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 CHRISTOPHER CONOSCIENTI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 582

... 2048 in benefits he had already received in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... App. Div.), certif. denied , 150 N.J. 24 (1997). Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), if an individual receives benefits for any reason while ...

docket:	a3268-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17999

62 REGINA M. REYNOLDS v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 579

... the benefits she had received before her ineligibility determination. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ...

docket:	a1009-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17459

63 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 576

... person . . . shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) mandates full recoupment of "unemployment benefits received by an ...

docket:	a0133-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15948

64 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 576

... person . . . shall be liable to repay those benefits in full. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) mandates full recoupment of "unemployment benefits received by an ...

docket:	a0132-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15949

65 IAN T. SHEARN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and NEWARK MORNING LEDGER CO -- rank: 573

... regulation, shall be liable to repay those benefits in full . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (emphasis added).] If there has been an overpayment ... be collectible in the manner provided for by law[.]" Ibid. " N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a2910-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	48501

66 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2866-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 570

... to be ineligible. The notice relied on the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Coppola appealed and the Tribunal held a telephone hearing ... of benefits received by Coppola was sought in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which provides in pertinent part: When it is determined ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	28361

67 LUIGI COPPOLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 570

... to be ineligible. The notice relied on the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Coppola appealed and the Tribunal held a telephone hearing ... of benefits received by Coppola was sought in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which provides in pertinent part: When it is determined ...

docket:	a5941-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29156

68 MATHEW T. SULLIVAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 570

... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case. . . . N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) provides, in pertinent part: When it is determined ... petitioner's ineligibility for such benefits. A-1664-20 9 ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a1664-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-07
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	24145

69 LEWIS M. SEAGULL v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 567

... an Appeal Tribunal and requiring him to refund $15,006, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), disqualifying him from receipt of unemployment benefits for one ... 5(g)(1), and imposing a fine of $3751.50, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). We affirm. Seagull essentially underreported his wages from August ... merit. Finally, Seagull argues the fine imposed upon him under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a) should be only twenty-five percent of the amount ...

docket:	a2659-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17980

70 GABRIEL JIMENEZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 567

... unemployment benefits while disqualified must 'repay those benefits in full.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Affirmed. A-2964-21 12 This archive is ...

docket:	a2964-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-12-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21416

71 CAREN KERN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BRAINSTORM LEARNING AND ARTS, LLC -- rank: 564

... decision establishing her liability to refund benefits previously received under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Accordingly, we decline to consider that portion of Kern ...

docket:	a3946-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16352

72 ISAIAH BOUIE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 560

... 299 N.J. Super. 671 , 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The agency is empowered to waive a refund ...

docket:	a2125-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14046

73 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2125-14.opn.html -- rank: 560

... 299 N.J. Super. 671 , 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The agency is empowered to waive a refund ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	13674

74 JEROME D. JETER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THRIFT DRUG, INC -- rank: 560

... to refund the $764 he received as benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Thereafter, Jeter filed an appeal to the Board, which ... the weeks ending October 5 through October 26, 2019. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), the agency is entitled to recoup benefits erroneously paid ...

docket:	a2215-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13889

75 HANS F. SCHMID v. BOARD OF REVIEW and VERNON COMPANY -- rank: 557

... and, also required he refund benefits erroneously paid, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The Board determined Schmid's request for benefits ... refund benefits received during the period of disqualification, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Schmid appealed. On February 21, 2008, the Board ... unemployment benefits, the statue requires repayment of any benefits received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Full recoupment of "unemployment benefits received by an ...

docket:	a4247-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15482