Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 LAWRENCE H. KAISER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. -- rank: 521

... him to refund benefits deemed to have been improperly paid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). In light of our standard of review, we ... for refund based upon an assertion of an undue hardship, " N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	A3717-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-24
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18583

92 KIYOTAKA INOUE v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 521

... The Appeal Tribunal also affirmed the refund request, based on N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which authorizes the collection of refunds when, for any ... benefits that were not rightfully due, they must be repaid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). This is so, even if the employee acted in ...

docket:	a4212-10
court:	appellate
decided:	2013-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19158

93 AMANDA A. HOLDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 518

... sought a refund from appellant of overpaid benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Appellant filed an administrative appeal of the agency's ...

docket:	a4036-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12734

94 JEFFREY HEMINGWAY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ONE POINT HRO LLC -- rank: 518

... to determine why he was directed to refund benefits, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), for the period of time he was unemployed and ... N.J. Super. 295, 298 (App. Div. 1977). Additionally, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), when a person has received unemployment benefits, but ...

docket:	a2733-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22759

95 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD PESSOLANO, -- rank: 518

... in this chapter (R.S. 43:21-1 et seq.).         [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(e).] Defendant relies primarily on State v. Pescatore , 213 N ...

docket:	a4315-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-08-06
status:	published
citation:	343 N.J. Super. 464
Document Size:	36018

96 MICHAEL C. FOLK v. BOARD OF REVIEW and EXPRESSJET AIRLINES -- rank: 515

... him address that matter with the Director in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... the agency is necessary for an additional reason. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), the Director is required to seek repayment for benefits improperly paid. But N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) gives the Director the authority to waive repayment ...

docket:	a0702-10
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15574

97 MONICA MCDERMOTT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and SPECTRUM FOR LIVING, INC -- rank: 512

... of benefits in the amount of $12,818 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). We affirm. Spectrum for Living, Inc. (Spectrum) employed ... receive shall be liable to refund the benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1), which states in pertinent part: When it is ...

docket:	a4485-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17384

98 JOSE J. GARCIA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and ARLO ELECTRONICS INC -- rank: 509

... the Director properly directed him to return those monies. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) (providing that a person ineligible for unemployment benefits ... within the four year time frame allowed for such requests. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). For all these reasons, the Board of Review ...

docket:	a4628-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12917

99 MADHURI R. PATEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY -- rank: 509

... s decision affirming her liability for a refund pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... such benefits. See Pub. L. No. 110-252, 4005(b); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). In this case, appellant received $18,752 in ...

docket:	a5335-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12972

100 IVONNE D. OVIEDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ABB, INC. -- rank: 509

... of Unemployment Benefits advising A-1488-21 2 that, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), she was liable to refund the $18,300 she ...

docket:	a1488-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-05-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10287

101 RACQUEL O. ENGLISH v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER, and ARC, MORRIS COUNTY CHAPTER N.J -- rank: 503

... April 19, 2008, through January 17, 2009, in accord with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... having received benefits when not entitled must repay those sums. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Even if the claimant received the money in good ...

docket:	a1762-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13715

102 JESSICA L. FURNARE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 499

... received will be determined by the Director in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)." This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...

docket:	a4089-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16709

103 DOUGLAS E. LONERGAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 496

... is liable for a refund of $17,695 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... to refund the sum of $17,695 as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Appellant requested a waiver pursuant to N.J.A ... while otherwise not entitled to receive such sum as benefits[.] [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).] In Bannan v. Bd. of Review , 299 N ...

docket:	a0955-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17359

104 JESSICA WILEMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 493

... 6(b)(1). The Appeal Tribunal also, as authorized by N.J.S.A. 43-21.16(d), directed appellant to refund the $28,562 she had ...

docket:	a0322-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24061

105 FLORIN D. CIMPEAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 493

... also directed appellant to refund these monies in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), unless the Director decided otherwise pursuant to N.J ... Board's final decision upholding the Appeal Tribunal's decision. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). Affirmed. This archive is a service of Rutgers ...

docket:	a4449-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13757