Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:21-19")   76 to 90 of 103 results. Run time: 0.612 seconds | Search time: 0.608 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Previous 15 Next 13
76 PAULA NOVAKOWSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HORIZON BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD June 2, 2011 – -- rank: 388
... completed calendar quarters immediately preceding an individual's benefit year." N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d) further defines benefit year as "the 364 consecutive calendar ... Review, to be October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). The final decision of an administrative agency may ...
docket: a5334-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20666
77 PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. BOARD OF REVIEW et al. -- rank: 377
... to employment is determined under the three prong standard of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A)(B)(C) (the ABC Test), we affirm ... engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A)(B)(C).] The three prongs of the ...
docket: a5637-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-12-31
status: published
citation: 397 N.J.Super. 309
Document Size: 47989
78 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a5884-10.opn.html -- rank: 365
... benefits from 08/15/10 through 08/21/10 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)." The Board "affirmed and adopted" the factual findings ... Close v. Kordulak Bros. , 44 N.J. 589 , 599 (1965)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1) provides the definition for "unemployment" for individuals such ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 16107
79 CAPITOL WINE & SPIRITS CO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BRIAN KURLEJ -- rank: 365
... benefits from 08/15/10 through 08/21/10 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)." The Board "affirmed and adopted" the factual findings ... Close v. Kordulak Bros. , 44 N.J. 589 , 599 (1965)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1) provides the definition for "unemployment" for individuals such ...
docket: a5884-10
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-15
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 17312
80 SAME DAY EXPRESS, INC. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. -- rank: 363
... engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(6).] Agreeing with petitioner that the DOL should ... presented. It is well settled that, the primary objective of [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-19] is to provide a cushion for the workers of New ...
docket: A2935-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-06-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35988
81 N.E.I. JEWELMASTERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 361
... was an independent contractor under the three-prong standard of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6) (the ABC Test), and failed to prove that ... engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6).] Generally, Prong A is referred to as the ...
docket: a2333-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23736
82 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4962-13.opn.html -- rank: 359
... Board) decision finding claimant ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C) and 43:21-4(e). Livres v ... May 14, 2015). As we noted in our prior opinion, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C) provides that employment shall not include "[s ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 11213
83 LINDA P. GIORELLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 356
... conclude that the Board's final decision must be affirmed. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1) defines the term "base year" to mean the ... quarter which occurs before the commencing of the benefit year. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d) defines the term "benefit year" as the 364 consecutive ... claimant's wages are insufficient to qualify for ordinary benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). The Act specifically requires that extended benefits be ...
docket: a4161-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16412
84 MIRIAM SUSSMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and TEMPLE BETH AHM -- rank: 343
... decision denying Sussman's claim for benefits. In particular, citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(D)(i), the Tribunal determined that Sussman's ...
docket: a0647-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-07-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29905
85 MAXIM BASCH v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 340
... considered unemployed as the sole stockholder of a viable corporation. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A). The Board affirmed on the basis of ... individual’s term of office or ownership in the corporation.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A); Rudbart, 339 N.J. Super. at 124 ...
docket: a3390-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-06-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12024
86 PATRICIA MAHER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 338
... her weekly benefit, and work less than full-time. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A) (stating that '[a]n individual shall be ...
docket: a0167-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-02-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20395
87 AMY B. WEINBERGER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 336
... reasons that follow, we affirm. This appeal is controlled by N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C), which precludes an employee from qualifying for ... office manager for her husband, an accountant. 1 Hence, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C), those weeks could not be considered in ...
docket: a3563-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-02-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 11279
88 ROBERT STIEH v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al. -- rank: 331
... completed calendar quarters before claimant 's claim is filed. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). Pursuant to that definition, the base year for ... grounds for eligibility, and found none applicable. See , e.g. , N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1)(optionally allowing consideration of a claimant's earnings ...
docket: a5258-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-05-10
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 22862
89 TODD R. LEATHERMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SEAPORT BUILDERS LLC, -- rank: 327
... appellate review in appeal from denial of unemployment benefits). Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C), which is a definitional provision of the ...
docket: a5275-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-06-09
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 15401
90 KENNETH WELSH v. WARREN COUNTY SPECIAL SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICT -- rank: 318
... ABC' test. 'ABC' refers to the first three subparagraphs of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6), which defines 'employment' for purposes of the Unemployment ...
docket: a2425-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-10-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34565
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Previous 15 Next 13
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!