Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 DALE J. ECKENSBERGER SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 306

... The Appeal Tribunal held appellant ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(I) because his employment as an elected official could not ...

docket:	a6241-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10964

92 CHERYL L. COBB v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 299

... not less than an amount twenty times the minimum wage. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(t)(3). For the applicable base year, a base week ... completed calendar quarters immediately preceeding an individual's benefit year." N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). The option of designating an "alternative base year ...

docket:	a2423-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12628

93 K.H v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DENNIS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 299

... N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and N.J.S.A. 43:21- 19(q). Consequently, the Tribunal held that appellant had to refund ...

docket:	a3110-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12843

94 JOSEPH A. SIMIRIGLIO, JR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 288

... unavailable for work during those two weeks, as defined under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(q). Appellant appealed the Tribunal's decision to the Board ...

docket:	a0556-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7635

95 GIOVANNI FERNICOLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW, et al. -- rank: 279

... employer, and who otherwise qualifies, is "unemployed" as defined by N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1) if the corporation had permanently ceased doing business ...

docket:	A0843-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2000-12-20
status:	published
citation:	335 N.J. Super. 523
Document Size:	9767

96 LEOPOLDO C. CHAVEZ - v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 277

... Board should have used an alternative base year, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c), to determine his eligibility. We disagree. Under the Act ...

docket:	a1423-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-12-03
status:
citation:
Document Size:	14952

97 JOSEPH REGINA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND PFISTER MAINTENANCE CORP., INC. -- rank: 265

... completed calendar quarters immediately preceding an individual's benefit year." N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). When Regina filed his initial unemployment claim on ...

docket:	a0874-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13472

98 JOSEPH DIPASQUALE V. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 254

... 57 N.J. 139 (1970). Interestingly, the 1991 amendment to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(2) affords claimants who receive benefits under the Temporary ...

docket:	a536-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-05
status:	published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 341
Document Size:	8971

99 JACK KOZA T/A TRIESTE VS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 247

... had satisfied parts A and B of the "ABC test," N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A),(B) and (C). Id. at 566-67 ...

docket:	a6764-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-01-12
status:	published
citation:	307 N.J.Super. 439
Document Size:	28734

100 GREGORY BODNARCHUK VS BOARD OF REVIEW & METRO SERVICE GROUP, INC. -- rank: 238

... that plaintiff did not establish the base year pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1) is not relevant to this proceeding. Plaintiff never ...

docket:	a5935-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-01
status:	published
citation:	309 N.J.Super. 399
Document Size:	7755

101 SALLY GROSSMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 224

... are analyzed in light of the three-prong standard of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6) (the ABC test). Her arguments are without sufficient ...

docket:	a0768-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15906

102 APRIL RYANS v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES -- rank: 220

... benefits because she was employed when she filed her claim, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A), and she failed to demonstrate good cause ...

docket:	a5271-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7157

103 NADEEN ROTKIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM -- rank: 195

... Temple, availing itself of an exemption for religious organizations in N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(D)(i), had made no unemployment and temporary ...

docket:	a1346-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9548