Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 BELINDA MENDEZ-AZZOLLINI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 837

... in order to requalify [for unemployment benefits], in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6)' – was erroneous. We agree the Board's ... the Appeal Tribunal concluded appellant was ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6) which sets forth the eligibility requirements for a ... the employer and as such, she did not requalify under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). Our review of an administrative agency decision is ... had four weeks of employment' during her period of reinstatement. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). 'Employment' is defined in N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a1154-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21330

17 DOROTHY MOORE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BERGEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LP -- rank: 830

... benefits from November 1, 2015, through October 29, 2016, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We affirm. Moore worked for Bergen Regional Medical ... from November 1, 2015 to October 29, 2016, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), because she was not available for work and ... day, the Tribunal held Moore ineligible for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) during the relevant time period because she was ... that Moore did not otherwise meet the eligibility requirements under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This appeal followed. On appeal, Moore argues it ... benefits was her failure to actively seek work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This statute provides that an individual is not ... seeking work.' Ford, 287 N.J. Super. at 284 (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21- 4(c)(1)). As for what constitutes actively seeking work, ' ...

docket:	a4382-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15868

18 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5106-18.opn.html -- rank: 830

... he was 3 This presumption arises from the language in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which provides as a condition to receiving unemployment ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	53880

19 NELSON P. BALBOA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 827

... September 5, 2010, the first full week of eligibility. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). GWC appealed to the Board of Review. Balboa does ...

docket:	a1500-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33752

20 EVAN F. AHERNE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KELLY SERVICES, INC -- rank: 827

... Tribunal). The Tribunal found him unavailable for work, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), and therefore ineligible for benefits from January 29 to ... 17T1 4 'unavailable for work with the employer[,]' pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c),2 and 'ineligible for benefits from [January 29] through ... s potential liability to refund any benefits received. 2 Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), '[a]n unemployed individual shall be eligible to ...

docket:	a0454-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20340

21 LEE C. HUGUENIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 827

... for unemployment benefits is determined by satisfying the requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. See N.J.A.C. 12:17-5.1 (describing ... cleared to work, satisfying three of the four requirements. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a)-(c). However, petitioner did not meet the "base week" or "wages" requirements under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4) because his only income was from workers' compensation ... As such, petitioner could not satisfy the fourth requirement of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. Petitioner contends the period of time during which he received ...

docket:	a3826-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15722

22 HILLARY HEIDEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 824

... concluding she did not qualify for unemployment benefits because under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) she had a reasonable assurance of continuing re ... not on a substitute list with the employer.' Citing to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), the Appeal Tribunal determined there were no reasonable ... was an implied agreement of recall.' For that reason, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), Heidel was ineligible for benefits. This appeal followed ... v. Bd. of Rev., 231 N.J. 589, 604 (2018)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) provides in pertinent part, a person who performs ... services provided, that is, a professional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) or non-professional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2). [Ibid.] Applying these principles, we find no ...

docket:	a0694-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25722

23 PHYLLIS Y. ELLIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 820

... of Review (Board) finding her disqualified for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), from April 12, 2009 through March 24, 2012 ... for benefits as she was unable to work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This section provides that an unemployed individual shall ... be available to work in order to qualify for benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). However, that section of the statute makes an ... disability, the person must be otherwise eligible for unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f) provides: The individual has suffered any accident or sickness ... out of work. . . . Subsections (f) and (g) were added [to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4], the former providing that where an unemployed individual suffered a ... apparent contradictory contentions of each party to the application of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f). Claimant contends she was able to work, for ...

docket:	a6265-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16605

24 ROY A. WESCOTT v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 820

... as irrelevant. Instead, the Appeal Tribunal applied standards enunciated in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4), which provides: An unemployed individual shall be eligible ... base year, or either of the two alternative base years, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)4(A); N.J.S.A. 43:21-19 ... year"); nor did he earn "remuneration not less" than $7300, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)4(B); N.J.A.C. 12:15-1 ...

docket:	a0115-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13824

25 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT v. CREST ULTRASONICS -- rank: 820

... jobs actively in order to qualify for unemployment benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) ("An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive ...

docket:	a0417-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-07
status:	published
citation:	434 N.J.Super. 34 82 A.3d 258
Document Size:	84810

26 CHERYL B. BOLAND v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND MIDLAND PARK BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 811

... s determination concluding Boland was ineligible for unemployment benefits, citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-12 ... App. Div. 1969). In its determination, the Board relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), which provides an exception to eligibility for unemployment ... services provided, that is, a professional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) or nonprofessional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2). [ N.J.A.C. 12:17-12.4 ...

docket:	a2334-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18237

27 BRANCHBURG TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND VASIL HLINKA, JR May 14 2015 -- rank: 811

... N.J. at 210-11. A. It is undisputed that N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) and (2) disqualify employees of educational institutions from ... he was "not ineligible" for benefits as a result of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2). Accordingly, on this point we agree with the ... N.J. Super. at 83-84, we found that the N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) limits did not apply when a board of ... in the case. Ibid. Ultimately, we decided the interplay between N.J.S.A. 43:21 4(g)(1) and their change in status did not bar ...

docket:	a4808-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18191

28 IAN T. SHEARN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and NEWARK MORNING LEDGER CO -- rank: 807

... with how the Board had defined "actively seeking work" under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Unemployment benefit eligibility is determined on a weekly basis. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 provides in pertinent part that "[a]n unemployed individual shall ... if" the individual "has demonstrated to be actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Thus, our Legislature has required that benefit recipients ... the Division has interpreted the "actively seeking work" requirement of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c) to mean that an individual must make a minimum ... t of Labor , 125 N.J. 567 , 588 (1991) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)). The claimant "must do more than being passively available ...

docket:	a2910-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	48501

29 RAUL R. DACOSTA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 804

... work," and must have "demonstrated to be actively seeking work[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). A claimant remains eligible for unemployment benefits if ... has furnished notice and proof of claim to the division[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1). Benefits paid under this subsection are "charged to ... disability benefits fund established by the 'Temporary Disability Benefits Law[.]'" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(3); see also Butler v. Bakelite Co. , 32 N ... law of any other state or of the United States[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(D). A claimant is also ineligible "[f]or ... is seeking disability benefits under the 'Temporary Disabilities Benefits Law[.]'" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(E); see also N.J.S.A. 43 ... same period, which is prohibited under New Jersey law. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(D). Because DaCosta received duplicative benefits, the ...

docket:	a1574-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22219

30 CLAUDETTE PARKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 801

... less than seven . . . eligible days during that calendar week.' See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and -19(q). However, the Tribunal found Parker ... demonstrated [that she was] . . . actively seeking work in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1).' In rendering its decision, the Tribunal credited Parker ...

docket:	a2463-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-09-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15314