Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 BESSIE KOHN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and HARROGATE INC -- rank: 781

... wage determination in factoring claimant's benefit year, 2010, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(4)(B) was $7,200. Claimant did not establish twenty base weeks of employment within the regular base year. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(A); N.J.S.A. 43:21-19 ... wage in effect . . . " during the base year of $7,200. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(B); N.J.A.C. 12:15-1 ...

docket:	a6293-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14320

32 ELAINE EMERY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 781

... such services the following year or term, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16 ...

docket:	a1909-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11870

33 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2764-17.opn.html -- rank: 778

... individual’s employment opportunities, as defined under subsection (c) of [ N.J.S.A.] 43:21-4; nor shall this subsection apply to any individual who, during ... year, earned sufficient wages, as defined under subsection (e) of [ N.J.S.A.] 43:21-4, while attending an educational institution during periods other than established ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24943

34 FANG LIU v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS LLC -- rank: 778

... accordance with such regulations as the [D]ivision may prescribe.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. After a person has filed a claim for benefits, the ... worker profiling system and its possible impact on the individual. [N.J.S.A. 43:21-4.1(b)(1)-(2).] Thereafter, it is required that: (a ...

docket:	a5896-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23214

35 WARREN M. JENTIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 778

... s determination that appellant's unemployment claim was invalid under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). Appellant's claim was ruled invalid because he did ... calendar quarters before the claim was filed, as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). Appellant admitted being self-employed from 2008 to 2009 ...

docket:	a0732-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20317

36 LISA A. LACKEY-LAUBSCH v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 775

... Tribunal held that appellant was ineligible for benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), because at the end of the school year ... Board erred when it disqualified her for benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). Nevertheless, she concedes she was 1 Appellant filed ... noted, the two successive terms at issue, as contemplated under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) are the spring and fall 2018 terms. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) provides in pertinent part that, a person who ... services provided, that is, a professional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) or nonprofessional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2). [N.J.A.C. 12:17-12. ...

docket:	a2582-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11033

37 ATUL PATEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 771

... to the unemployment office during that period as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-2.1 ...

docket:	a5127-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24288

38 VLAD Y. MAKUTOFF v. BOARD OF REVIEW and SOCIETY GENERAL -- rank: 762

... because he was not "available for work," a requirement of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). This unavailability results from his limited work authorization, issued ... employers made him "available for work" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). We conclude it does not. The burden of proof ... s position that Makutoff was not "available for work." See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). Since Makutoff needed DHS approval before he could even ... considered available for work). The Director's commonsense reading of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c) is entitled to the deference accorded to it by ...

docket:	a3444-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-23
status:	published
citation:	427 N.J.Super. 218 48 A.3d 362
Document Size:	23416

39 JAMES W. LUCAS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 758

... sufficient base year weeks or base year wages in employment, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). Our examination of the record satisfies us that the ... s determination that Lucas's benefit claim was invalid under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e) because he lacked sufficient base year weeks or base ... of work. Consequently, his claim is invalid in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). However, Lucas contends that the Department's position, where ... benefits, if otherwise eligible and not otherwise disqualified. See generally N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 (eligibility conditions); N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 (disqualification ...

docket:	a3749-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33853

40 CHRISTOPHER A ANDERSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 755

... be eligible for unemployment benefits, a person must be "unemployed". N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1 ...

docket:	a1353-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20656

41 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 736

... her therefore also ineligible for disability benefits during unemployment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(F). The Board also ordered Noga to refund ... unrelated to the work, thereby disqualifying her from receiving benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(F) authorizes payment of disability benefits to employees ... benefits under this chapter . . . except for the inability to work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1). Since Noga was not eligible for unemployment benefits ...

docket:	a2773-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

42 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 736

... her therefore also ineligible for disability benefits during unemployment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(F). The Board also ordered Noga to refund ... unrelated to the work, thereby disqualifying her from receiving benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(F) authorizes payment of disability benefits to employees ... benefits under this chapter . . . except for the inability to work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1). Since Noga was not eligible for unemployment benefits ...

docket:	a2774-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

43 DEBRA LEVIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE -- rank: 732

... in that same week. The Director predicated his decision on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which states that '[a]n unemployed individual shall ... 7) eligible days during that calendar week, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and N.J.S.A. 43:21- 19 ... was superseded by the Legislature in 1961 when it adopted N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J ... Supreme Court thereafter clarified the scope of the standard in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) by approvingly quoting the Board of Review's ...

docket:	a4031-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16414

44 WAYNE MCCAW v. VERNON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 732

... failed to actively search for new employment as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). D. The Litigation Plaintiff filed a four-count complaint ...

docket:	a0875-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54597

45 K.H v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DENNIS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 723

... May 4, 2013, because she was unable to work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and N.J.S.A. 43:21- 19 ... actively seeking work for the period she applied for benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1); Ford v. Bd. of 2 None of the ...

docket:	a3110-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12843