Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 SUSAN G. GILBERT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and AVON-BY-THE-SEA BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 719

... of the benefits unless she complies with the necessary procedures. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 provides in relevant part, "[a]n unemployed individual shall be ... c), (f) (emphasis added).] These reporting requirements are consistent with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a), placing the Division in a position to periodically reexamine ...

docket:	a0636-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22428

47 JOANNE H. JONES v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 716

... 2009 on the ground that she was unavailable for work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), and the Director found that Jones was liable for ...

docket:	a5598-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15965

48 RUTH I. MICHENER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 713

... the Board determined that Michener was eligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) because, in the period covered by her claim ... found that Michener was not eligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). The statute provides in pertinent part that, a ... services provided, that is, a professional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) or nonprofessional capacity as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2). * * * 3. An employee who is employed for all ... correctly determined that Michener was not eligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). Michener nevertheless argues that she is entitled to ...

docket:	a5823-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18661

49 CELESTE A. LAMPLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 706

... from February 7, 2016, through February 4, 2017, as per N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The refund amount was remanded for a recalculation ...

docket:	a2047-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16445

50 JUDITH SAMUEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PORT AUTHORITY -- rank: 690

... she had failed to accumulate twenty base weeks of employment, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(A), and had not earned the minimum amount of base wages. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(B). The notice denying Samuel's claim clearly ... in the base year, or otherwise accumulate the requisite earnings. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(A) and (e)(4)(B). Samuel did not ...

docket:	a1501-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12678

51 GARY J. SABO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 687

... to benefits unless he complies with the necessary procedures. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4, [a]n unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits ... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). 4 "Although the Act is to be liberally ...

docket:	a4658-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18567

52 RICHARD KUTCHER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 687

... not given the opportunity to resume working within his capabilities. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 sets forth the eligibility conditions for unemployment benefits, which includes ... course of the claimant's "base year" of employment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4), (5); N.J.S.A. 43:21-19 ...

docket:	a5231-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22940

53 LAWRENCE H. KAISER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. -- rank: 671

... him to perform services in the subsequent academic term. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-12 ... Review , 155 N.J. Super. 312 , 315 (App. Div. 1978). N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) prohibits the payment of unemployment benefits during the ... 171 N.J. Super. 424 , 426 (App. Div. 1979). Furthermore, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3) states: benefits shall not be paid on the ...

docket:	A0320-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19462

54 LAWRENCE H. KAISER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. -- rank: 671

... him to perform services in the subsequent academic term. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-12 ... Review , 155 N.J. Super. 312 , 315 (App. Div. 1978). N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) prohibits the payment of unemployment benefits during the ... 171 N.J. Super. 424 , 426 (App. Div. 1979). Furthermore, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3) states: benefits shall not be paid on the ...

docket:	A3717-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-24
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18583

55 PATRICIA MAHER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 664

... for work, or actively seeking work. The Tribunal relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which states that an individual is eligible for ... to work elsewhere, which is a requirement of benefit eligibility. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). It is of no moment in this case ... that her real estate training program was so approved. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(4)(A) (stating that a person 'shall not be ...

docket:	a0167-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20395

56 ANIL SHARMA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and KEAN CORPORATION - -- rank: 661

... the grounds that he was not available for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). On June 18, 2009, the Director sent Sharma ... benefits. Makutoff , supra , 427 N.J. Super. at 225 (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)). Moreover, as discussed below, Sharma's claim is barred ... color of law at the time the services were performed. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(i)(1).] This statutory provision conforms to the requirements of ... the United States, he could not qualify for unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(i)(1). In light of Congress's plenary power to ...

docket:	a0607-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14084

57 RONALD LOMBARDI v. BOARD OF REVIEW RUTGERS UNIVERSITY -- rank: 657

... holding that appellant was ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) is supported by substantial, credible evidence in the ... those persons employed in education on a ten-month basis. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3). Measured under our standard of review, we discern ...

docket:	a0229-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16811

58 NIA M. BARNETT v. BOARD OF REVIEW MERIT MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL -- rank: 654

... available to work while a student; and (3) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), because she was not able to work and ...

docket:	a2025-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15235

59 STEVEN R. WILSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 651

... affirmed on April 16, 2013, after a telephonic hearing. Citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(1), 1 the Tribunal agreed with the deputy that ... has had sufficient earnings or wages during his "base year." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e), -19(c)(1). A "base year" generally consists of ... received over two years of workers' compensation benefits. Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(1) was deleted from the law in 2001. The Tribunal should have cited N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4). The language of the statute has changed, but ...

docket:	a4874-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13547

60 RACHEL L. BIRZIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 651

... on this finding, it concluded that she was ineligible under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) for the benefits she received during the summer ... establish that she is eligible for benefits. Id. at 218. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) specifically disqualifies individuals who work in an instructive ... institution in the second of such academic years or terms." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1); see Charatan v. Bd. of Review , 200 N ... not called back to work during two different spring semesters. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) tailors the unemployment statute to the unique ten ...

docket:	a2129-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15759