Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 JULIANNE BERNSTEIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 521

... unavailable for and unable to work, as provided for in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). 1 The Director demanded that appellant pay back ... Review. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(D). Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) provides, in pertinent part: "An unemployed individual shall ...

docket:	a0019-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12135

92 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0117-13a0118-13.opn.html -- rank: 514

... of the individual, the validity of any claim filed under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f) shall not be effected by the leave of absence ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23972

93 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4962-13.opn.html -- rank: 514

... base weeks of covered employment to be entitled to benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11213

94 WILLIAM F. ARANGUREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and OCEAN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL -- rank: 508

... Tribunal affirmed the denial for the same reason, namely, that N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2) makes instructional employees of an educational institution who ... 26 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(6)(A)(i). N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2) incorporates this federal provision into state law. Aranguren ...

docket:	a5998-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	11387

95 PAULA NOVAKOWSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HORIZON BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD June 2, 2011 – -- rank: 508

... week that she filed for benefits and was unemployed. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a). Thus, the lump sum payment of $1,384.62 ...

docket:	a5334-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20666

96 DORI J. MOLLOY v. BOARD OF REVIEW and UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION -- rank: 508

... she was available for work and actively seeking work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). The hearings were also occasioned by difficulties in obtaining ... and demonstrate that he or she is "actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We concur with the factual determination that petitioner ...

docket:	a4208-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17228

97 WILLIAM F. ARANGUREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and OCEAN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL -- rank: 508

... Tribunal affirmed the denial for the same reason, namely, that N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2) makes instructional employees of an educational institution who ... 26 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(6)(A)(i). N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2) incorporates this federal provision into state law. Aranguren ...

docket:	a0802-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11760

98 EMANUEL HERNANDEZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 498

... benefits, Hernandez had to meet the conditions set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4, which include a requirement that "[t]he individual is able ... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). In his appeal, Hernandez argues that he was ... was "unavailable for work" and, therefore, ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) because he did not contact the employer for ...

docket:	a4353-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12204

99 SHERILL L. LYM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 495

... hearing, the Appeal Tribunal found Lym ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21 ... s decision on March 5, 2014. The present appeal followed. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6) provides that to be eligible for benefits in ...

docket:	a3407-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13212

100 MAXIM BASCH v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 488

... Appeal Tribunal concluded that Basch did not have requalifying wages, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6), and was not statutorily considered unemployed as the ...

docket:	a3390-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12024

101 Caballero v. Martinez -- rank: 488

... See N.J.S.A. 30:4D-3(i) (Medicaid); N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(i)(1) (unemployment); N.J.S.A. 44:10-48a ...

docket:	a-8-05
court:
decided:	2006-05-18
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	72238

102 AMY B. WEINBERGER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 482

... least a certain amount in wages performing qualifying employment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(A), (B). The majority of the employment weeks ...

docket:	a3563-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11279

103 NIA M. BARNETT v. BOARD OF REVIEW MERIT MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL -- rank: 475

... available to work while a student; and (3) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), because she was not able to work and ...

docket:	a2025-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16049

104 EDWIN GALINDEZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SDH EDUCATION EAST LLC -- rank: 472

... not "actively seeking work" during that period as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We affirm. The relevant facts regarding Galindez's ... to work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). To qualify for benefits, a claimant must make ...

docket:	a1016-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14634

105 JOEY CHAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. -- rank: 472

... claim dated 08/24/03, this claim is invalid under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)." We have reviewed the record and the briefs under ...

docket:	A1363-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23415