Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 STEVEN J. PHILLIPS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 533

... lieu of his $1500 a week job as a salesman. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c); Goodman v. Bd. of Review , 245 N.J. Super ... determinative that work is not 'suitable' within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c) and a refusal to accept such a position does ... and for each week thereafter until the individual becomes reemployed." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 12:17-9 ...

docket:	a1344-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20387

107 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3103-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

108 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3102-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

109 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3101-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

110 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a2091-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

111 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3121-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

112 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3175-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34609

113 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3859-19.opn.html -- rank: 530

... the Board of Review upholding his disqualification for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) on the ground that he was discharged from employment ... 19 10 Brady, 152 N.J. at 221-22. However, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) disqualifies individuals from benefits for six weeks when 'the ... been suspended or discharged for misconduct connected with the work. . . .' N.J.S.A. 43:21- 5(b) defines 'misconduct' as: [C]onduct which is improper, intentional ... written documentation demonstrating that the employee's actions constitute misconduct . . . .' N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). In some cases, courts have found that 'a single ... connected with the work to sustain Kent's discharge under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), the Tribunal specifically found that Kent was not terminated ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23623

114 DOLORES SINCLAIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 530

... restored to their respective job[s]. The Bureau relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) which, in pertinent part, states: In the event the ... payments they received constituted "back pay" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); and appellants were required to refund the benefits they ... it too. The [appellants] received back pay and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), they are liable to refund the unemployment benefits received ... received were the equivalent of a back pay award under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Instead, the five appellants who the Appeal Tribunal found ... honor their agreement to return the unemployment benefits they received. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b); see Brady v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J ...

docket:	a3286-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34611

115 DENNIS V. ESTREMA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LOWE'S HOME CENTER INC -- rank: 530

... s Home Center for gross misconduct connected with the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). We affirm. Estrema began working at Lowe's as ... and Disability Insurance found Estrema disqualified to receive benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), because he was terminated from his employment on the ... to receive benefits for gross misconduct connected with the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Based on the evidence presented, the Appeal Tribunal found ... compensation benefits based on gross misconduct attributable to the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The Board affirmed the Appeal Tribunal's findings and ... compensation benefits based on gross misconduct connected with the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Affirmed. 1 All hearings held by the Appeal Tribunal ...

docket:	a0040-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16895

116 ELAINE EMERY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 528

... was disqualified for benefits as of June 28, 2020, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because 'she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ...

docket:	a1909-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11870

117 FRANHEL AMARO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 528

... work, which results in an eight-week disqualification for benefits, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), versus a voluntary quit, which results in a complete disqualification, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), we infer that the Deputy initially disqualified Amaro for ... voluntary and without good cause attributable to such work." See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Hence, Amaro was deemed completely disqualified for benefits, and ...

docket:	a3579-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16692

118 DAVID KLEINSCHMIDT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 526

... that he was terminated from his job for severe misconduct. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Appellant appeals, claiming that the Board erred. We affirm ... benefits because he had been terminated for "severe misconduct" under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Id. at 7. The Tribunal found that appellant falsified ... and "severe misconduct" by an employee as follows: Until 2010, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) identified two types of misconduct that prevented full receipt ... It results in an eight-week disqualification from unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). We described this "two-prong standard" for misconduct as ... an intermediate type of misconduct, "severe misconduct," was added to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). L. 2010, c. 37, § 2, eff. July 1 ...

docket:	a5850-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18919

119 JOYEBUZOR-ONAYEMI v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 526

... discharged her for severe misconduct connected with the work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Appellant appealed these determinations to the Appeal Tribunal (Tribunal ...

docket:	a2001-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32499

120 PATRICIA ACKLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 526

... the State of New Jersey for misconduct connected with work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). 1 We affirm. Ackley is employed as a senior ... disqualified for benefits for the six-week period pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) on the ground she was suspended for misconduct connected ... regard to Ackley's disqualification for misconduct connected with work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-10.l ... right to expect. The claimant is disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), as of ll/08/09 through 12/19/09 ... which was substantial and prevented the claimant from reporting"). Although N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) does not define misconduct, we have held that the ...

docket:	a4947-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19198