Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 MARY ROMANCIO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 517

... she was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left her job voluntarily without good cause ... she was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Romancio maintains that she did not voluntarily resign from ... found that Romancio was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), which provides that an individual may not receive benefits ... s determination that Romancio was disqualified from benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Romancio additionally argues that she should not be required ...

docket:	a1880-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20846

137 CHRISTOPHER CONOSCIENTI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 517

... that Conoscienti was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] In order to avoid disqualification, the claimant has the ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Moreover, an employee who leaves work for a good ...

docket:	a3268-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17999

138 JAMES W. LUCAS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 517

... generally N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 (eligibility conditions); N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 (disqualification criteria). However, a self-employed person, or a working ...

docket:	a3749-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33853

139 A-0ADAM T. WISNIEWSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, CHERRY, WEBER amp ASSOCIATES, P.C., and KONKUS CORPORATION May 13 2015 -- rank: 514

... Wisniewski a determination finding him disqualified from employment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... weeks that must be worked to qualify for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). This appeal followed. On appeal, Wisniewski contends that leaving ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment[.] " N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) (emphasis added). An employee who has left work voluntarily ... but personal reason is also subject to the disqualification under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). See Pagan v. Bd. of Review , 296 N.J ... an additional week and earned the requisite amount, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because he was terminated after only seven weeks at ...

docket:	a3080-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14241

140 HALINA PELCZAR v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 514

... and held that Pelczar was disqualified for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left her job voluntarily without good cause ... within her medical condition restrictions. The Examiner then concluded that N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) did not apply because Pelczar had not left work ... then held that Pelczar was disqualified from receiving benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Pelczar appeals and argues that she left her work ... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee who has left work voluntarily bears the ... leaves work for personal reasons is subject to disqualification under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Morgan v. Bd. of Review , 77 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a2899-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18813

141 JESSICA SILLER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SMITH & NEPHEW INC -- rank: 512

... therefore "disqualified for benefits as of [April 26, 2009] under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)." We affirm. The facts of this matter are not ... employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) (providing that an individual shall be disqualified for unemployment ... benefits, notwithstanding its voluntarily-leaving-work-without-good-cause doctrine, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she had a federally-endorsed "compelling family reason ... for unemployment benefits during part-time work searches, and (2) N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(j) does not disqualify someone from unemployment benefits who left ...

docket:	a2844-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19755

142 ALLEN RABERT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 510

... Review disqualifying him from receipt of unemployment compensation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board determined that Rabert left his job without ... Tribunal found that Rabert was disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left his job without good cause attributable ... was entitled to only a limited disqualification for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c) for refusing to accept suitable new work because his ... unreasonable, the agency's ruling should not be disturbed." Ibid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), a provision of the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law ... the case as a refusal to accept suitable work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c) instead of as a voluntary quit without good cause ...

docket:	a3576-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18861

143 TINA ZACCHIA v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and DAVID'S BRIDAL, INC., and BRIDES BY DEMETRIOS -- rank: 510

... was disqualified for benefits from September 11, 2011, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left her position with Brides by Demetrios ... the examiner found that Zacchia was not disqualified pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) due to the termination of her employment at DB ... that Zacchia's qualification for benefits should be considered under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), which provides, among other things, that an employee may ... examiner determined, however, that Zacchia was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of September 11, 2011, because she left her ... erred by finding that she was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). In her brief, she sets forth facts about her ... to the termination of her employment at DB under either N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) or (b). Zacchia also sets forth facts concerning ...

docket:	a5948-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	19323

144 REBECCA M. BENEDICT v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 510

... Tribunal (the Tribunal) and denied her unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... for benefits as of March 25, 2012, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she "left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... it be disturbed. Brady , supra , 152 N.J. at 210. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that "[a]n individual shall be disqualified for ... period had not demonstrated good cause within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5). Lastly, Benedict argues the Board should have considered that the ...

docket:	a3060-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15849

145 ANDREA N. FRAZIER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 510

... of Review , 194 N.J. 534 , 543 (2008) (citation omitted). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) disqualifies an individual from the receipt of unemployment compensation ... the] work.'" Utley , supra , 194 N.J. at 544 (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)). The phrase "'good cause attributable to such work' means ... supra , 245 N.J. Super. at 558-60; see also N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c)(1) (delineating the factors to be considered in determining ... Wojcik and Johns-Manville and contrary to the governing statute, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), as implemented by N.J.A.C. 12:17 ...

docket:	a6228-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-22
status:	published
citation:	439 N.J.Super. 130 106 A.3d 1252
Document Size:	21132

146 LUIS F. MATEO v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 510

... the work." He was therefore disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board of Review affirmed the Appeal Tribunal's ... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Implementing regulations provide for discharge or suspension for unauthorized ... The Board therefore appropriately disqualified Mateo for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The remainder of Mateo's arguments lack sufficient merit ...

docket:	a2212-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29406

147 MARY ANN LYNN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, -- rank: 508

... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of March 3, 2019. Specifically, the Appeal Tribunal ... work and disqualified her as of February 24, 2019, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she did not A-1370-19 6 communicate ... and was based upon a reasonable interpretation of the law. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that an individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation ... leaving work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Claimant's remaining arguments lack sufficient merit to warrant ...

docket:	a1370-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22074

148 CESAR A. GONZALES SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 508

... that he was terminated from his job for severe misconduct. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). We reverse and remand for the Board to consider ... was disqualified for benefits due to severe misconduct pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Specifically, the Appeal Tribunal determined that Gonzales did "not ... N.J. Super. 29 , 33 (App. Div. 2001). Until 2010, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) identified two types of misconduct that prevented full receipt ... but results in an eight-week disqualification from unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). In determining what constitutes misconduct, we described the "two ... an intermediate type of misconduct, "severe misconduct," was added to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). L. 2010, c. 37, § 2, eff. July 1 ...

docket:	a0761-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16328

149 SHERRI D. DEMMER v. BOARD OF REVIEW and W.S. SCHUCKER, JR. & COMPANY -- rank: 508

... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... held that the burden of showing good cause pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 is on the claimant and the test is whether there ... for benefits as of 7/15/2007 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Demmer appealed to the Board. The Board dismissed Demmer ... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board adopted the findings of the Appeal Tribunal ... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). This is based on our narrow scope of review ...

docket:	a4125-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11913

150 JENNIFER RODGERS v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 508

... was discharged for severe misconduct connected to her work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). She argues that the decision of the Board is ... her discharge arose from severe misconduct connected with her work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). On appeal, Rodgers argues that the Board's determination ... v. Bd. of Review , 152 N.J. 197 , 218 (1997). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) identifies three categories of misconduct connected with the work ... severe misconduct and gross misconduct. "Severe misconduct" was added to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) as a new misconduct provision by amendment in 2010 ... is not considered gross misconduct as defined in this section. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b).] N.J.A.C. 12:17-10.2(a ...

docket:	a6142-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14914