Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

151 MARY ANN LYNN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, -- rank: 508

... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of March 3, 2019. Specifically, the Appeal Tribunal ... work and disqualified her as of February 24, 2019, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she did not A-1370-19 6 communicate ... and was based upon a reasonable interpretation of the law. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that an individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation ... leaving work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Claimant's remaining arguments lack sufficient merit to warrant ...

docket:	a1370-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22074

152 SAMUEL J. BALLARD, SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 508

... found that he was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left his job voluntarily without good cause ... determined that Ballard was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... attributable to such work" is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The statute does not define "good cause" but that ... the work, and was therefore disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Where, as in this case, a claimant alleges that ...

docket:	a2519-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14164

153 SHERRI D. DEMMER v. BOARD OF REVIEW and W.S. SCHUCKER, JR. & COMPANY -- rank: 508

... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... held that the burden of showing good cause pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 is on the claimant and the test is whether there ... for benefits as of 7/15/2007 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Demmer appealed to the Board. The Board dismissed Demmer ... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board adopted the findings of the Appeal Tribunal ... disqualified for benefits as of July 15, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). This is based on our narrow scope of review ...

docket:	a4125-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11913

154 A-0JENIFFER RANGHEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE NETWORK OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC January 13, 2014 -- rank: 505

... that Ranghel was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... Ranghel was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), she had left her employment voluntarily without good cause ... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] In order to avoid disqualification, the claimant has the ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee who leaves work for a good, but ...

docket:	a4125-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18789

155 ANTHONY WILSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 505

... left work voluntarily, without good cause related to work, citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Appeal Tribunal found that claimant's allegations that ... cause attributable to such work and for each week thereafter . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee bears the burden to show that he ...

docket:	a1329-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24791

156 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a3382-15.opn.html -- rank: 505

... she resigned for good cause attributable to the work, see N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Appellant appealed the Deputy's determination to an Appeal ... the new employees. The Appeal Tribunal denied appellant benefits. Citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), the Tribunal found she voluntarily left her position with ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	14932

157 BAVAN MACK v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 505

... Close v. Kordulak Bros. , 44 N.J. 589 , 598 (1965). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) identifies three categories of misconduct 2 connected with the ... severe misconduct and gross misconduct. "Severe misconduct" was added to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) as a new misconduct provision by amendment in 2010 ... is not considered gross misconduct as defined in this section. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b)(emphasis added).] In Silver , supra , we construed these examples ...

docket:	a4811-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15100

158 ROBERTO HALAL v. BOARD OF REVIEW and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES INC -- rank: 505

... 43:21-16(a) (providing for imposition of a fine); N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g)(1) (disqualifying a person from obtaining benefits "for a ...

docket:	a2878-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24235

159 CLAUDIA J. WATERMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 503

... decision of the Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) finding, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), that Waterman was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits because ... for benefits as of 10/23/11 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)." The Tribunal made the following findings: [Waterman] left work ... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] In order to avoid disqualification, the claimant has the ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee who leaves work for a good, but ...

docket:	a0445-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20248

160 DORA M. RIVERA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 503

... found that she was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left her job voluntarily without good cause ... determined that Rivera was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... attributable to such work" is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The statute does not define "good cause" but that ...

docket:	a5942-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17269

161 KRISTEN A. POLLAG v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 503

... that Pollag was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... that Pollag was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she had left her employment voluntarily without good ... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] In order to avoid disqualification, the claimant has the ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee who leaves work for a good but ...

docket:	a0148-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16265

162 MONIQUE J. MANFRA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 503

... voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Manfra worked for Memorial Middle School in ... The Appeal Tribunal, therefore, concluded that Manfra was disqualified under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) from May 26, 2013, because she "left work voluntarily ... found that Manfra was disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), which provides that an individual may not receive benefits ... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Manfra failed to demonstrate that she left her position ...

docket:	a0909-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15401

163 CONGREGATION BETH CHAIM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 501

... she was therefore not eligible for benefits, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Appeal Tribunal also cited N.J.A.C ... been better used for its charitable and humanitarian causes. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), a claimant who "left work voluntarily without good cause ... and did not do so voluntarily within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Although her discharge was not proven to have been ...

docket:	a4448-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23450

164 MARYBEL PAZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW and CONTROL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL -- rank: 501

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). "'[G]ood cause attributable to such work' means a ... attacks the Board's conclusion that she "left work voluntarily." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). She notes that "a compelled resignation does not constitute ...

docket:	a5358-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26207

165 ELIZABETH LINE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MATHENY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL, INC -- rank: 501

... she had refused, " without good cause, to accept . . . suitable work. " N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c). Her decision to leave was not found to be voluntary and "without good cause attributable to such work," N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c). The decision stated she was only disqualified from June ... 85 N.J. Super. 46, 53 (App. Div. 1964), and N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), the Board concluded Line simply did not have good ... capricious, [nor] unreasonable," it will be affirmed. Id. at 210. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that an individual who leaves work "voluntarily without ... proof that her departure was for good cause. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) and Zielenski , supra , the Board of Review decision is ...

docket:	a4033-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14603