Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

166 JIMMY LIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 501

... that Lin engaged in "severe misconduct" requiring disqualification pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), as well as repayment of the benefits he had ...

docket:	a2169-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24487

167 LYNN SCHROEDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and FREEDOM HOME HEALTHCARE, INC -- rank: 498

... agency's decision arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. We disagree. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), a person is ineligible for unemployment benefits if he ... personal reason, however, do not qualify for unemployment compensation under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). See Brady, 152 N.J. at 213 (1997) (stating N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) was amended 'in 1961 to disqualify claimants who left ... being absent due to her condition. As a result, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), Schroeder was properly disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because ... Review should have conducted a suitability of work analysis under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-11.1 ...

docket:	a4040-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19736

168 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4126-16.opn.html -- rank: 498

... Review (Board) finding her ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board adopted the February 27, 2017 decision of ... Board's decision should be reversed because (1) it misapplied N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) by calculating her start date at Gateway in calendar ... 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). A-4126-16T3 3 N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) disqualifies claimants from receiving benefits if they 'left work ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). However, the statute provides an exception to a claimant ... Pursuant to the clear terms A-4126-16T3 4 of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We reject ... calendar, days because it is premised upon an interpretation of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) that is contrary to the statute's plain ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	9678

169 HANS F. SCHMID v. BOARD OF REVIEW and VERNON COMPANY -- rank: 498

... appeal tribunal's denial of unemployment benefits in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) and, also required he refund benefits erroneously paid, pursuant ... for a period of five weeks immediately following the suspension. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Though not defined in the statute, it is well ...

docket:	a4247-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15482

170 JEFFREY ZIEMBA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 496

... The Appeal Tribunal ruled appellant was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... is disqualified for benefits as of [November 13, 2016], under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), as the claimant left work voluntarily without good cause ... at least ten times the individual's weekly benefit rate[.]' N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The statute does not define 'good cause.' That term ...

docket:	a0051-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13963

171 TONI BELFORD DAMIANO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 496

... of Rev.ew decision granting Nicole Casciola unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Damiano employed Casciola as a full-time ... and issued a written decision disqualifying Casciola for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), as of April 15, 2018. The Tribunal found [Damiano ... good cause for leaving work and no disqualification arises under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 5(a). I. The scope of our review of an administrative ... J. at 590. [Utley, 194 N.J. at 543.] Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), an employee is disqualified from receiving benefits if 'the ...

docket:	a1827-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17937

172 VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW,  -- rank: 496

... misconduct connected with the work. Therefore, no disqualification arises under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) as [Riccordella] was not discharged for misconduct connected with ... benefits for gross misconduct connected to the work, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), and he was liable to repay benefits he had ...

docket:	a4701-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17327

173 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3455-17.opn.html -- rank: 496

... gross misconduct connected with the work, within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), and must refund unemployment benefits he improperly received in ... appear. The Appeal Tribunal found appellant was not disqualified under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), nor liable for a refund of $4452 under N ... the transfers and concluded he was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) because he was discharged for gross misconduct connected with ... prior to the day upon which the individual was discharged. [N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b).] N.J.S.A. 2C:20-3 provides as ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	13394

174 ALLIED INTERIOR CONTRACTORS INC. v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 496

... decision, Deirocini should be held eligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily with good cause attributable ... 4 a section of the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), provided that a claimant is disqualified for benefits: [f ... at least six times the individual's weekly benefit rate . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) (emphasis added).] An employee who has left work voluntarily ... Bd. of Review , 152 N.J. 197 , 218 (1997). While N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) does not define "good cause," the statute has been ... a sufficient work-related reason, is disqualified from receiving benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Allied argues that Deirocini's reasons for resigning were ...

docket:	a5741-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24692

175 A-0EDWARD J. MONACO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and A.A.H. OF BERGEN COUNTY, INC January 13, 2014 -- rank: 494

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Our examination of the record satisfies us that the ... to such work and, therefore, is disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of November 7, 2010. On July 23, 2012 ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Moreover, an employee who leaves work for a good ...

docket:	a6376-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23790

176 MARZINNO C. LEMBO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 494

... Tribunal) that appellant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left his employment at respondent Kelloggs Sales ... appellant contends he was entitled to unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 because he left his job for good cause. He argues ... App. Div. 1964)). As noted, the statute in question here, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that a person is disqualified from receiving unemployment ... decision. The determination that appellant was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause ...

docket:	a0903-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20440

177 CHERYL A. STOLBA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 491

... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. The record reveals that Stolba was a ... determined Stolba was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left work for personal reasons unconnected with ... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Tribunal affirmed the Deputy's decision, and the ... it be disturbed. Brady , supra , 152 N.J. at 210. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that "[a]n individual shall be disqualified for ...

docket:	a4670-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13345

178 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 491

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Tatem did not appeal and that determination became final ... unemployment compensation. By resigning, he was disqualified from receiving benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An individual is disqualified to receive unemployment benefits [f ... employment at least six times the individuals weekly benefit rate. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] Tatem did not contest the Deputy's denial of ... and earned at least six times his weekly benefit rate. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Unfortunately, Tatem had not met these qualifications prior to ...

docket:	a0132-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15949

179 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 491

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Tatem did not appeal and that determination became final ... unemployment compensation. By resigning, he was disqualified from receiving benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An individual is disqualified to receive unemployment benefits [f ... employment at least six times the individuals weekly benefit rate. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] Tatem did not contest the Deputy's denial of ... and earned at least six times his weekly benefit rate. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Unfortunately, Tatem had not met these qualifications prior to ...

docket:	a0133-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15948

180 Brady v. Board of Review -- rank: 491

... work,” thereby rendering them ineligible for unemployment benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).     Claimants are former employees of the Inland Fisher Guide ...

docket:	a-28-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-12-22
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 197
Document Size:	58466