598 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 43:21-5")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:21-5") 31 to 45 of 598 results.	Run time: 0.866 seconds \| Search time: 0.859 seconds
Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 40 Previous 15 Next 15

31 ROBERT J. DURISH v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 629

... and concluded that he was disqualified for benefits based on N.J.S.A. 43:21-5, which disqualifies an individual for benefits for the week the ... personal reasons is disqualified for unemployment benefits. The controlling statute, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), states: An individual shall be disqualified for benefits: . . . (a ... from employment will be considered 'voluntary' within the intent of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) only if 'the decision whether to go or to ... work for personal reasons, a situation which disqualifies him under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) from receiving unemployment benefits. The Board so found, and ... argument is unsupported by precedent and contrary to the statute, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). There is no evidence in the record that the ... date on his house not changed. And as appellant concedes, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) disqualifies for benefits an employee who leaves work ...

docket:	a5744-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25665

32 RANDOLPH A. BEHN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 626

... disqualified for benefits from 11/13/11 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board of Review affirmed on the basis of ... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). See also N.J.A.C. 12:17-9 ... and earned ten times the individual's weekly benefit rate. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). 2 A person who voluntarily quits work for personal ... responsibilities of the offered position are factors in determining suitability. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c). A position is not suitable if it pays less ... that he was authorized to quit over a transfer, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because, if unemployed for other reasons, he would have ... authorized to reject reemployment in that position as "unsuitable" under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(c). Goebelbecker , supra , 53 N.J. Super. at 59. ...

docket:	a0289-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50019

33 SHIRLEY H. WILSON HOLDEN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 624

... for further consideration of the "newly[-]enacted" anti-lockout provision, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d)(2). 2 Bustard v. Bd. of Review , 401 N ... in the labor dispute which caused the stoppage of work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d)(1)(a) and (b). The Board noted, "[a]s ... in determining she was disqualified from receiving benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d)(1) because she did not participate in, was not ... disturbed. Brady , supra , 152 N.J. at 210. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d)(1), an applicant is ineligible for benefits if the ... small or large is not the test for disqualification under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d). . . . Any financing of a labor dispute disqualifies a claimant ... their sister local and were ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d). Holden's claim regarding the amount of repayment ...

docket:	a3877-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24460

34 DOROTHY MOORE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BERGEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER LP -- rank: 622

... determined that Moore was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work at Bergen Regional Medical Center ... report submitted to support her claim for an exemption under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(j) was sufficient documentation as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(j)(2). I. We derive the following facts from the ... Tribunal determined that Moore did not qualify for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(j), which allows the payment of benefits to individuals who ... the nature of the work itself[,]" Moore was disqualified under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as she "left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). An employee who has left work voluntarily bears ...

docket:	a4455-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23670

35 S.M. v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and LIBERTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATES -- rank: 620

... Board), disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left employment with respondent, Liberty Insurance Associates ... that claimant was not disqualified from receiving benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she "did not leave the job voluntarily without ... The Board not only found claimant ineligible in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), it also determined that, pursuant to N.J.S ... Div. 2007)). In reaching its decision, the Board relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), a section of "New Jersey's Unemployment Compensation Law ... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). A claimant seeking unemployment compensation benefits has the burden ... s] failure to do so disqualifies her for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause ...

docket:	a4243-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29846

36 ROBERT TARZIAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VERIZON -- rank: 620

... which found that appellants were disqualified from receiving benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because they "left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... findings, the Appeal Tribunal found plaintiffs "disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of 11/16/03, as the [plaintiffs] left ... 381 N.J. Super. 162 , 168 (App. Div. 2005)). However, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) disqualifies an individual from the receipt of unemployment compensation ... each week thereafter until the individual becomes reemployed.'" Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)). Therefore, "benefits are available to a worker who voluntarily ... incentive package, they are disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), unless they "establish by 'definite objective facts,' (1) a ... an early retirement package, is disqualified from receiving benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). 268 N.J. Super. 54 , 55 (App. Div. ...

docket:	a0265-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64582

37 ROBERT TARZIAN - v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VERIZON -- rank: 620

docket:	a1328-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64583

38 ROBERT TARZIAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VERIZON -- rank: 620

docket:	a0540-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64582

39 ROBERT TARZIAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VERIZON -- rank: 620

docket:	a0141-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64582

40 CHRISTOPHER A ANDERSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 617

... Board of Review that disqualified claimant from unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We vacate the decision and remand. I. Claimant was ... individual's weekly benefit rate, as determined in each case." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). At the hearing, claimant was told by the Appeal ... BEING EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE, MAY NOT BE DISQUALIFIED FROM BENEFITS UNDER N.J.S.A. 43:21.5. Point II: THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL INCORRECTLY APPLIED N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) IN RENDERING THEIR JANUARY 23, 2014 OPINION AS CLAIMANT ... However, an unemployed claimant can be disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5. "[D]isqualification applies 'when a person gives up partial employment ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). A worker who chooses to terminate employment for ...

docket:	a1353-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20656

41 TERRENCE I. MURPHY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 615

... Tribunal that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), because he was terminated by his employer, respondent K ... for purposes of unemployment eligibility." The Board contends that under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), "severe misconduct" includes "repeated lateness or absences after a ... misconduct given above, the claimant is disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The Board subsequently affirmed that decision and this appeal ... are three tiers — misconduct, severe misconduct, and gross misconduct. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). "Misconduct" is conduct that is "improper, intentional, connected with ... been suspended or discharged . . . and for the seven weeks" thereafter. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). By contrast, "severe misconduct" is not precisely defined, but ... lateness or absences after a written warning by an employer." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Because the term "misconduct" is presumed to have ...

docket:	a2455-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21867

42 KELLY A. SPINA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 613

... Appeal Tribunal finding her disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) for misconduct connected with the work. Plaintiff also appeals ... Department of Unemployment held plaintiff disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) from December 20, 2009 to January 30, 2010, because ... which immediately follow that week, as determined in each case." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). 6 "Misconduct" is defined as an act that is ... 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). 6 An amendment to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), effective July 1, 2010, substituted "seven weeks" for "five ...

docket:	a6028-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39823

43 JEROME D. JETER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THRIFT DRUG, INC -- rank: 613

... found he was not entitled to unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Jeter was employed by Thrift Drug, Inc ... which stated that he was disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left his position at TD for personal ... Appeals Examiner noted that to avoid disqualification for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), a claimant must show he or she left work ... found that Jeter was disqualified from unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), which states that an individual may not receive benefits ... employment.' Moreover, we have construed the term 'good cause' in N.J.S.A. 43:21- 5(a) to mean a 'cause sufficient to justify an employee ... Board's determination that Jeter was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work for personal reasons, not ...

docket:	a2215-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13889

44 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1756-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 613

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	39018

45 JUNE G. VALENT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 610

... Board characterized as "simple misconduct connected to the work" under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). We reverse. Appellant's employer did not prove appellant ... with the work and no disqualification for benefits arises under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The employer has not presented evidence sufficient to disturb ... on "simple misconduct connected to the work in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b)." II Our standard of review of a decision made ... finding appellant disqualified for unemployment benefits for simple misconduct under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), based exclusively on her refusal to comply with her ... magnitude to render her disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). N.J.A.C. 12:17-10.6 describes ...

docket:	a4980-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-05
status:	published
citation:	436 N.J.Super. 41 91 A.3d 644
Document Size:	26430

Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 40 Previous 15 Next 15