Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

376 SUSAN C. HOLTZBERG v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND THE GABLES, INC -- rank: 398

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We reverse and conclude that the Board's decision ... employer did not constitute good cause for leaving work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). On April 21, 2010, the Board of Review affirmed ... working conditions, has established good cause within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), thus entitling her to unemployment benefits. The burden of ...

docket:	a4429-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32055

377 LIZA ATAMY v. BOARD OF REVIEW and PATERSON CHARTER SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY -- rank: 395

... voluntarily left work without good cause attributable to the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Atamy appealed administratively and the Appeal Tribunal initially reversed ... period for what it deemed to be 'work-related' misconduct. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). After the disqualification period expired, Atamy would have been ...

docket:	a3895-15
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-07
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17141

378 DAWN NEHRING v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 393

... left her job without good cause attributable to the work. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). She contends that the Board's decision was arbitrary ... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Claimant appealed from that determination to the Appeal Tribunal ...

docket:	a0471-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11845

379 REEM SALEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 393

... Review (Board) finding her ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) as a result of severe misconduct connected to the ... s determination, finding that claimant was disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) 'as the discharge was for severe misconduct connected with ... v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210 (1997). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) provides, in pertinent part, that an employee who has ...

docket:	a5532-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21069

380 NANCY YOUSSEF v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 393

... that she had voluntarily left her position without good cause. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The deputy's determination was issued and mailed on ...

docket:	a3783-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11061

381 CARLOS M. POLANCO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 393

... that he was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). We affirm. Polanco worked in a supervisory capacity for ... ineligible to receive benefits because of severe misconduct. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), "theft of company property" constitutes severe misconduct. Here, the ...

docket:	a0772-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	13555

382 DONNA FITZGERALD v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 391

... voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal ... THE EMPLOYER TERMINATED HER BY LETTER DATED MAY 31, 2012. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) disqualifies a claimant from receiving unemployment benefits if the ...

docket:	a1049-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13328

383 ERIC LACKLAND v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADVOSERV OF NEW JERSEY, INC -- rank: 391

... for severe misconduct connected with the work as defined by N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The Tribunal found that Lackland repeatedly failed to comply ... v. Bd. of Review, 91 N.J. 453, 459 (1982)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) provides that a person is disqualified for benefits if ... the work, malicious, and within the employee's control.' Ibid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) provides an enhanced penalty for individuals discharged for 'severe ...

docket:	a3578-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-09-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9665

384 PAULA M. RODRIGUEZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 391

... left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Our examination of the record satisfies us that the ... to such work and, therefore, is disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) as of August 29, 2010. On July 6, 2011 ... a sufficient work-related reason is disqualified from benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Moreover, an employee who leaves work for a good ...

docket:	a0338-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20400

385 THOMAS M. WEIR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 391

... Tribunal finding his claim for unemployment benefits invalid pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) due to his discharge for gross misconduct. After reviewing ... Johnson , 42 N.J. 146 , 162 (1964) (internal quotations omitted)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) governs unemployment benefits when a claimant has been discharged ...

docket:	a5955-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11453

386 JOHN P. DARRAGH v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 391

... good cause and is disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Darragh began his full-time employment at ... J. Tpk. Auth. , 137 N.J. 8 , 27 (1994).] Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), an individual is disqualified for benefits "[f]or the ...

docket:	a0974-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13317

387 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 391

... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), and finding her therefore also ineligible for disability benefits ... case, the interests of justice do not require any intervention. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that a person is ineligible for unemployment benefits ...

docket:	a2774-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

388 STASIA NOGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW and STRAVAL MACHINE CO INC -- rank: 391

... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), and finding her therefore also ineligible for disability benefits ... case, the interests of justice do not require any intervention. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that a person is ineligible for unemployment benefits ...

docket:	a2773-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17468

389 ROBERT M. WALKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 389

... from receiving benefits as of August 26, 2018, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Walker was employed by respondent Patel Alcoholic ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment . . . . [N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] An employee who has left work voluntarily has the ... agency's determination to disqualify Walker for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) was arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. Affirmed. A-2124-18T1 ...

docket:	a2124-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11505

390 DEBRA WILSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 389

... Appeals Examiner determined that she was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). That statute states in pertinent part: An individual shall ... benefit rate. Those figures were from a previous version of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), which had been amended before appellant filed her claim ...

docket:	a3187-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12465