Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 TANE BOGDANOSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and JUPITER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -- rank: 484

... Hence, the claimant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On appeal, claimant argues that as English is ... J. Turnpike Auth. , 137 N.J. 8 , 27 (1994)). Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), a claimant has ten calendar days after the ...

docket:	a3642-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13494

107 HENRY J. KOCH Claimant- v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and ENTEL SYSTEMS, INC - -- rank: 477

... employer chose not to participate in the Board's hearing. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) sets forth the procedure for appeals of an ...

docket:	a1975-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23889

108 BARRY S. ZALL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 474

... claim for benefits made in accordance with subsection (a) of [ N.J.S.A. ] 43:21-6 shall be deemed to be a "valid claim" for the ...

docket:	a1842-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12268

109 HONOREE M. GIBNEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KELLY SERVICES, INC -- rank: 474

... 4.1(h). The ten-day statutory time for appeal, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), has been held to be jurisdictional. Lowden v ...

docket:	a2280-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	21406

110 MARY C. SULLIVAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, et al. -- rank: 474

... to administer benefits under the criteria established by law . See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) . T he Board's duty is to "preserve the ...

docket:	a3661-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31047

111 JORGE E. ALVAREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW and ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE, INC -- rank: 470

... good cause for the late appeal and that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the merits ... solely addressed to the substantive merits of the adverse determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) states in pertinent part: 1 The parties shall be ...

docket:	a2761-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11871

112 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/000172-17opn.opn.html -- rank: 446

... of the benefits she received. Id. at 87. See also N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). An untimely administrative appeal was filed with the ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25809

113 BRUCE A. CYMANSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and SHORELINE GRADING AND EXCAVATING INC -- rank: 429

... has earned at least six times his weekly benefit rate. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 BASED ON THE DATES SHOWN ON DOCUMENTS, 2a, 3a, 4a ... 6b, 7a, 8a, 8b, 9a, 9b, 10a, AND 11a. THEREFORE N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 DOES NOT APPLY, AND SHOULD NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DENIAL ...

docket:	a6679-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-09-25
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	22151

114 DEANNA M. ALSTON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC -- rank: 429

... periods explained in the Request for Refund are statutory. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) ('Unless the claimant or any interested party, within ...

docket:	a4604-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10505

115 JOSEPH REGINA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND PFISTER MAINTENANCE CORP., INC. -- rank: 404

... until more than three months after the calculation. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), an appeal must be filed within ten days ...

docket:	a0874-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13472

116 AMANDA A. HOLDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 397

... administrative appeal of the ineligibility determination as untimely, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Board of Review upheld that untimeliness ruling ...

docket:	a4036-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12734

117 DINA R. EVANGELISTA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 387

... forth twice in the determination Evangelista received, is governed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The definition of a good cause exception to ...

docket:	a5066-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15097

118 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3536-18.opn.html -- rank: 377

... have twenty days from the date the decision was mailed. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). If a further appeal is not initiated, the Appeal ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	6159

119 MICHELLE GUZMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 373

... February 26, 2013. It is not disputed that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the notification stated Guzman could appeal within seven ...

docket:	a0587-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11258

120 DEBORAH J. ALLEN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 370

... Allen had not filed within ten days as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) and had not established good cause within the meaning ...

docket:	a5592-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-24
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	10509