Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 KAITLYN SHEEDY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ULTA SALON, COSMETIC FRAGRANCE, INC -- rank: 764

... 1, 2020. The Appeal Tribunal denied claimant's appeal, explaining: N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides that an appeal must be filed within ... APPEARING that the appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the Deputy's determination having become final, and ... 24 (App. Div. 1986). Importantly for purposes of this appeal, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires an appeal from a notice of determination ...

docket:	a2555-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-07-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23102

17 NELSON P. BALBOA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 757

... within twenty days after the "date of notification or mailing." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c); see also N.J.A.C. 12:20-4 ... to the Appeal Tribunal for a fair hearing, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(d), from the demand for refund. We recognize such a ...

docket:	a1500-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33752

18 A-0KEVIN DAVIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW, MOBILE CLEANING SYSTEMS, LLC AND MARINE CONTRACTING LLC,1 May 19 2015 -- rank: 754

... determination, but did not appeal within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On April 27, 2013, less than eight weeks ... last-known address" to file an appeal from the determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). If the claimant does not timely appeal the ...

docket:	a3046-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19326

19 MARIA E. PENA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and VEXWIRE LLC -- rank: 750

... Board was not required to make any additional findings. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e)(stating that the Board may, in part, "affirm, modify ...

docket:	a6378-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-14
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	19349

20 TEDIAR DESANTIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PINE BELT MANAGEMENT LLC -- rank: 743

... That twenty-day deadline matches the timeframe set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(c). At the beginning of its decision, the Tribunal stated ... the mailing date of the Tribunal's decision pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) and had failed to show good cause under N ... supported by the record and applicable law. Accordingly, we affirm. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) directs that: The parties shall be duly notified of ...

docket:	a1088-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11806

21 JIMMY LIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 733

... Appeal Tribunal's decision mentions the fact that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e), the Board has the right to "take jurisdiction over ... days after the mailing of the Appeal Tribunal's decision. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). As we held in Von Ouhl v. Board of ... 52 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 130 N.J. 10 (1992), N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) provides that a decision of an Appeal Tribunal "shall ... appeal is initiated pursuant to subsection (e) of this section." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) authorizes appeals to the Board of Review by interested ... it must act within the ten day period provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Kaske v. State of N.J., Bd. of Review ...

docket:	a2169-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24487

22 FRANSCISCA RAMIREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EXECUTIVE HOME CARE, LLC -- rank: 733

... d). The Board dismissed the appeal for lateness pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). After a review of the contentions advanced on ... ten days from the mailing of the notice to object. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-3.3 ... exception to the twenty-day period for filing appeals under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), based in part on the claimant's inability to ... unable to determine the timeliness of the employer's objection. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides, in pertinent part: Unless the claimant or ...

docket:	a3755-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31235

23 DOREEN L. SIMON v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 730

... East Windsor synagogue, and any corporate entity or entities. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) (stating the Board may 'direct the taking of additional ...

docket:	a1972-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41194

24 JOSEPH A. KNOEBL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC -- rank: 726

... denial of benefits was filed beyond the time provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) without a showing of good cause for the ... and without good cause attributable to the work. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), Knoebl had ten days from the date of ... appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the Deputy's deter­mination having become final ... 29 (1981). In this case there is no dispute that N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires that an appeal be filed within ten ...

docket:	a3560-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32076

25 AFFOTEY AGO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 723

... Review (Board) dismissing his administrative appeal as untimely, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Our examination of the record satisfies us that the ... this delay exceeded the twenty-day statutory maximum allowed under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), the Board dismissed the appeal as untimely on August ... Tribunal's decision to the Board is set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), which provides in pertinent part: The parties shall be ... after the date of notification or mailing of such decision. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c).] Here, the Board found that appellant did not file ...

docket:	a0976-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15240

26 FRANHEL AMARO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 712

... filed beyond the twenty day time limit set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). However, the same July 6 Board decision recited that ...

docket:	a3579-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16692

27 FRANK E. CARUSO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE -- rank: 712

... 2009, the Board dismissed the appeal as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). This appeal followed. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), the Appeal Tribunal's determination "shall be deemed to ... mailing of such decision, further appeal is initiated pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e)]." As noted, the Appeal Tribunal's determination was mailed ... 3 The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), concluding that appellant had not shown good cause for ... law in which other appeal periods are set forth, including N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), upon which the Board based its decision in this ...

docket:	a5669-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14549

28 WILLIAM F. ARANGUREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and OCEAN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL -- rank: 709

... letter was a form notice advising appellant in accord with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), that the decision "become[s] final, unless, within ten ... 2008, the Board dismissed the appeal as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). After the 2006-2007 school year, Aranguren filed a ...

docket:	a5998-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	11387

29 WILLIAM F. ARANGUREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and OCEAN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL -- rank: 709

... letter was a form notice advising appellant in accord with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), that the decision "become[s] final, unless, within ten ... 2008, the Board dismissed the appeal as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). After the 2006-2007 school year, Aranguren filed a ...

docket:	a0802-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11760

30 DIANE A. WAITES v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 705

... that Waites filed the appeal beyond the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). The Board noted that Waites had not shown good ... from a decision by the Appeal Tribunal is prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), which states in pertinent part that unless an appeal ... board of review, unless further appeal is initiated pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-(6)(e)] within [ten] days after the date of notification or ... mailed its decision to Waites on July 22, 2010. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), Waites had until August 1, 2010 to file her ... Waites' appeal was not filed within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), and Waites failed to establish good cause for her ...

docket:	a1903-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13999