Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 MIRON FAYNERMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 615

... to the benefit of the two-determination rule. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14 ...

docket:	a5019-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34766

62 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2945-18.opn.html -- rank: 605

... the claimant did not understand the reason for her disqualification. .... N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides that an appeal must be filed within ... that claimant's appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) is supported by sufficient credible evidence in the ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11373

63 RICHARD DELGADO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 605

... determinations with respect to . . . claims for benefits . . . shall be presented . . . .' N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(f). N.J.A.C. 1:12-14.3 governs ...

docket:	a2103-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38385

64 ERICA DELGADO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 605

... found untimely under the twenty-day period set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). The Board dismissed her appeal. Delgado appealed to this ...

docket:	a0113-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25341

65 ALEKSANDR LISENKOV v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 602

... appeal from an initial decision of benefits is governed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). That statute provides that unless the claimant files ...

docket:	a3026-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9636

66 MARGI BOUTRS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and AHS HOSPITAL CORPORATION -- rank: 602

... Board dismissed the appeal without discussion of the merits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Boutrs appeals, claiming the Board's 'misstating the date ... the Board of Review due by January 19, 2021. See N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(c). The letters Boutrs' counsel sent to the Appeal Tribunal ...

docket:	a3037-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-09-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13993

67 ROBERT J. WOLF v. BOARD OF REVIEW and FREEHOLD MACY'S EAST -- rank: 602

... Board) dismissing his administrative appeal for late filing pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). We affirm. Appellant filed a claim for unemployment compensation ... July 23, 2012, 1 in order to be considered timely. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c); N.J.A.C. 12:20-4.1(c ... the Board dismissed the appeal for late filing pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). This appeal followed. Our scope of review of an ...

docket:	a0333-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14032

68 DONNA WARE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 595

... it had not been filed within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and because Ware failed to show good cause ... had not filed the appeal within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Appeal Tribunal determined that Ware had not ... appeal had not been filed within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and she failed to establish good cause for ...

docket:	a1500-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-13
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	17773

69 P.S. v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 595

... final agency decision dismissing her appeal as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. On August ... her being wrongfully denied benefits. On August 25, 2015, citing N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), the Board of Review dismissed the appeal based upon ... In re Herrmann , 192 N.J. 19 , 27-28 (2007). N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) provides that: an appeal tribunal, after affording the parties ...

docket:	a0734-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19486

70 FRANKLYN D. VEGA-CRUZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 591

... of the Deputy Claims Examiner's decision as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Appellant twice told the examiner that he had ... The Appeal Tribunal then dismissed the appeal as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On April 13, 2012, appellant filed an appeal ... the Board. However, the Board dismissed the appeal pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), because it was filed more than twenty days after ... to the twenty-day limitation on filing appeals provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) should be employed. Subsequently, the Board promulgated a regulation ...

docket:	a6130-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11711

71 JOSE A. OLIVERAS, SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW and MERCURY LIGHTING PRODUCTS CO INC 2011 - -- rank: 591

... was filed untimely with no good cause having been shown, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). We affirm. Oliveras filed a claim for unemployment ... Mercury Lighting Products Co., Inc., through his union. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the Appeal Tribunal dismissed Oliveras' appeal because it ... held that the appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) because no good cause was shown for the ... within seven days of the receipt of the initial determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). N.J.A.C. 12:20-4.1 ...

docket:	a2839-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10161

72 JESSICA L. WALKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and TELESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC -- rank: 584

... dismissed the appeal because it was untimely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) and appellant did not show good cause for the ... May 18, 2010, the Board dismissed the appeal pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), finding it was untimely filed and appellant failed to ... of such decision, further appeal is initiated" with the Board. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Late filing can be excused only upon a showing ...

docket:	a5801-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8780

73 JAMES K. REILLY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 581

... finding that PVSC's appeal was timely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Next, the examiner applied the benefit reduction provision ...

docket:	a0911-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18931

74 RICHARD A. POLINE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 574

... appeal from the determination of the director is prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which states in pertinent part: Unless the claimant ...

docket:	a3576-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36561

75 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2146-18.opn.html -- rank: 570

... to dismiss appellant's application for relief as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). We affirm. On March 26, 2017, appellant filed ... date the notice was mailed to her last-known address. N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). A-2146-18T3 2 Appellant appealed the Director ... cause to warrant the relaxation of the time restrictions in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Appeal Tribunal noted that pursuant to N ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	7433