Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 JOYEBUZOR-ONAYEMI v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 1000

... must meet a number of statutory requirements set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-60, including 3 A-2001-16T4 two that are relevant to the present appeal. In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 provides that ABT shall be provided to any individual who ... a telephone hearing that appellant was ineligible for ABT under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a). The Tribunal found that because appellant was terminated by ... not due to 'substantial reduction in work' as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a). The Tribunal did not address the fact that appellant ... Tribunal's conclusion that appellant was ineligible for ABT under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a). Instead, the Board denied her claim based upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(b) which, as stated above, provides that ABT benefits ...

docket:	a2001-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32499

2 CATHERINE G. ALEXANDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and COUNTY OF UNION -- rank: 967

... Alexander also sought extended unemployment benefits during training pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and -61. However, her application was denied in a Workforce ... affirmed by the Board of Review, and this appeal followed. N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 authorizes the payment of ABT benefits to eligible individuals during ... that received by Alexander, and Chapter 47, as codified in N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and -61, authorizes ABT payments. In findings set forth in ... initially provided, in language virtually identical to the language in N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 governing extended ABT payments: In order to be eligible for ... 1513.] In contrast, the regulation implementing the eligibility requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-60, from the outset, provided in language different from the statute ... eligibility for ABT benefits in the light of language of N.J.S.A. 43:21-60. First, we note that paragraphs a, b and d ...

docket:	a1592-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-27
status:	published
citation:	405 N.J.Super. 408 965 A.2d 167
Document Size:	67034

3 YANERIS MERCEDES NOLASCO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and MIRACA LIFE SCIENCES -- rank: 827

... Review (Board) finding her ineligible for extended unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(c) and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1 ... which the Tribunal affirmed the Deputy's determination pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(c) and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1 ... Review , 405 N.J. Super. 408 , 411 (App. Div. 2009). N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(c) authorizes the payment of extended benefits during education and ... in such training prior to lay-off . . . ." Here, relying on N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(c) and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1 ... C. 12:23-5.1(a)(2) was inconsistent with N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a). Alexander v. Bd. of Review , supra , 405 N.J ... additional benefits in light of the statutory language contained in N.J.S.A. 43:21-60. Id. The court did not, however, address the section ...

docket:	a3261-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19798

4 LINDA D. STEWART v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al. -- rank: 787

... that denied her application for additional benefits in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-60. We affirm. Claimant filed a claim for unemployment benefits effective ... Statement , Assembly No. 1406, L. 1992, c. 47, § 1; N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 only if the individual: a. Has received a notice of ... impaired by a substantial reduction of employment at the worksite." N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1, we ...

docket:	a3533-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-03-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	34875

5 JOSE J. BONILLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al. -- rank: 762

... in work opportunities that entitled him to additional benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1.     Bonilla ... rate of $289. Thereafter, he filed for additional benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60.     On July 13, 1999, the Division of Unemployment Insurance declared ... 624 (App. Div. 1994). This applies to ABT claims under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60, which provides, in pertinent part, that additional benefits shall be ... former job, which he argues constitutes "good cause," pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-60.     It is undisputed that Bonilla left his job for health ... and more significantly, he is ineligible for additional benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 because there was no evidence of a "substantial reduction of ...

docket:	A1480-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-03-13
status:	published
citation:	337 N.J. Super. 612
Document Size:	12665

6 ROBERT S. SCHOMBURG v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND PARKWAY PLASTICS, INC. -- rank: 687

... we deemed significant in disqualifying Bonilla for additional benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 was, as with Schomburg here, the fact that there was ... at 616-17. We conclude that Schomburg's contention that N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 is unconstitutional as interpreted because it violates his federal and ...

docket:	a6296-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-29
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	34986

7 JUDY MIAO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and THE ARC OF SOMERSET COUNTY -- rank: 658

... was separated from the work . [(Emphasis added).] The Tribunal continued: N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 provides in part that additional benefits shall be provided [to ... s job classification at his or her former worksite;" From N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1, it ... ineligible for additional unemployment benefits during training as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1. In ...

docket:	a3965-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37216

8 GLENN J. LAVENDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 593

... was the result of the nature of his termination. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(b). On August 9, Lavender appealed to the Appeal Tribunal ... Brady, 152 N.J. at 210. When the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a) in 1992, it provided additional benefits could be paid ... for unemployment benefits 'at the time of layoff or termination[.]' N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(b). The very purpose of ABT is to enable those ...

docket:	a1311-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10091

9 ANTHONY R. CIMINERA V. BD OF REVIEW -- rank: 593

... that time that claimant first received the counseling contemplated by N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 prescribes the criteria for eligibility for extended benefits. Subsection d ...

docket:	a1721-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-03-11
status:	published
citation:	319 N.J.Super. 217
Document Size:	15911

10 ANTHONY P. NOCE v. BOARD OF REVIEW and FLAGSHIP RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Before Judges Parrillo and Roe On appeal from the Board of Review, Department of Labor, Docket No 277,796 Anthony P. Noce, , -- rank: 571

... be eligible and not disqualified for receipt of benefits. See , N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(b). Noce was disqualified for unemployment benefits because he voluntarily ...

docket:	a6274-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17712

11 PHYLLIS R. SHIDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW et al. -- rank: 514

... his or her former worksite." The Appeal Tribunal stated: From N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1, it ... ineligible for additional unemployment benefits during training as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 and N.J.A.C. 12:23-5.1. The ...

docket:	A0486-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23977

12 CURTIS R. WARD v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NORTH WARD CENTER -- rank: 507

... his application for additional unemployment benefits during training, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 . . . ." Bonilla v. Bd. of Review , 337 N.J. Super. 612 ... of a "substantial reduction of employment " at the North Ward . N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(a). At the telephonic hearing, claimant asserted that he had ...

docket:	A2614-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19665

13 MELISSA A. SWINDELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND AMERICAN ASPHALT CO. -- rank: 428

... 12:23-5.1 FLOUTS THE PLAIN STATUTORY LANGUAGE OF N.J.S.A. 43:21-60 AND IS THEREFORE INVALID AND UNDER THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF ...

docket:	A0118-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14965

14 AUDRA D. CALLOWAY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and WASSERMAN, JURISTA and STOLTZ -- rank: 384

... not ineligible for additional benefits during training as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-60[]." After reviewing the record in light of the applicable law ...

docket:	a4942-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	16974

15 ANITA BOSE V. BOARD OF REVIEW & MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL -- rank: 370

... skills and earning power" in the field of chemistry. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-60(g).     In view of the foregoing and the beneficial purposes ...

docket:	a7178-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-08-04
status:	published
citation:	303 N.J.Super. 619
Document Size:	6274