Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 ROBERT MINSTER v. MICHAEL VOLOVNIK -- rank: 403

... 2 Plaintiffs sought damages under the Security Deposit Act ('Act'), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, and damages for reimbursement of costs they claimed ...

docket:	a3149-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30327

47 STEVEN BATITSAS v. PARK POINT INVESTORS LLC -- rank: 397

... a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs violated the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26 (Count One); a judgment ordering plaintiffs to turn ...

docket:	a1813-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27117

48 TYRONE FOXWORTH v. ATLANTIS APARTMENTS -- rank: 394

... award of fees pursuant to R ule 2:11-4. N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 requires a landlord to place a tenant's security deposit ...

docket:	a2826-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28468

49 YVONNE BUDDINGTON v. EMANUEL SHAMAM -- rank: 391

... the amount pursuant to the Security Deposit Act (the SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. We affirm. Defendant contends that the judge's ...

docket:	a0634-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25436

50 NAILA FIRDAUS v. ILONA MASTER -- rank: 383

... also found the landlords unintentionally violated the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, but does not appear to have awarded any ...

docket:	a4372-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19816

51 ASHLEY POLAND v. JONATHAN SANDVILLE -- rank: 380

... amount of $9849 pursuant to the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. As ...

docket:	a1796-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-18
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20040

52 TOP QUALITY REALTY, LLC v. JOSEPH CUPO -- rank: 380

... 46:8-21.1 of the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. The provision cited requires landlords to provide an ...

docket:	a3925-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20809

53 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0058-21.opn.html -- rank: 377

... statutory penalties for violation of the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. We affirm. On March 12, 2021, plaintiff filed ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	12624

54 ANN MORRIS v. LARRY FRISKE -- rank: 377

... 2431 entered pursuant to the Security Deposit Act (the "Act"), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, after a small claims trial. We affirm substantially ...

docket:	a2118-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	14702

55 PAUL A. AMIRATA v. BERNICE PINE -- rank: 377

... the Special Civil Part under the Rent Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -21.3, based on defendant's alleged wrongful failure ...

docket:	a2157-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13991

56 ASHLEY E. POLAND v. JONATHON SANDVILLE -- rank: 368

... money from her security deposit. The Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26 "establishes the landlord's obligations in unmistakable and ...

docket:	a1177-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19450

57 GEORGE PATTERSON v. CHRISTINE REIDINGER -- rank: 365

... 373.59 to tenants. Because the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, requires such a doubling and the imposition of ...

docket:	a3089-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-12
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	12574

58 MARKO PARIS v. ENGEL INVESTMENTS, LLC -- rank: 365

... trial court found defendant violated the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, 'intended to protect tenants from overreaching landlords who ...

docket:	a1582-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19648

59 ANA MARIA RODRIGUEZ v. HOSSEIN AMERI -- rank: 351

... did not seek double damages under the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:	a1710-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10969

60 49-71 STATE STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC v. LARRY J. YATES -- rank: 342

... plaintiff in violation of the New Jersey Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, ordered defendant's security to be applied to ...

docket:	a4548-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-08-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37475