Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:14-17")   46 to 60 of 80 results. Run time: 0.795 seconds | Search time: 0.788 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous 15 Next 15
46 MICHAEL MCDERMOTT v. SCHOOL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 557
... such as the federal Medicare program, or for other reasons. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.46.5(d).] In addition, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.46.6 states in pertinent part that under the SEHBP ... or investigative service or supply from coverage under the SEHBP. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.46.6. McDermott argues, however, that the Commission erred by ...
docket: a1464-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26451
47 JAYNEE LaVECCHIA v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 542
... created to institute a health benefit plan for State employees. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.27. Any insurance contracts purchased by SHBC are required to ... to purchase contracts that are subject to limitations and exclusions. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 (D). Additionally, the SHBC is statutorily prohibited from providing ...
docket: a4753-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 120014
48 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2853-19.opn.html -- rank: 540
... in N.J.S.A. 40A-10:21.1 and N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c). The PBA also appeals from a March 16 ... their health care benefit premiums based on their annual income. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c).1 Chapter 78 cited two statutes relevant to ... prior contract.' The statute stated public employees were bound by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c) and N.J.S.A. 40A:10-21 ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 31145
49 IN THE MATTER OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN -- rank: 535
... pursuant to a scale based upon income set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c), and further established that no employee would contribute ...
docket: a1244-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-01-29
status: published
citation: 429 N.J.Super. 309 58 A.3d 1186
Document Size: 83867
50 IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FORPROPOSALS #17DPP00144, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT -- rank: 535
... L. 2011, c. 78, §§ 45 and 46 (amending N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.27 and N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.46.3). See also Rosenstein v. State, Dep't of ...
docket: a4751-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-05-11
status: published
citation: 454 N.J.Super. 527 186 A.3d 332
Document Size: 188064
51 JACK C. SNEDEKER v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 530
... pursuant to the New Jersey Health Benefits Program Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25 to -.45. That plan is administered by Horizon Blue ... in the best interests of the State and its employees . . . ." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28. The minimum level of benefits these contracts may provide ... Super. 435 (App. Div. 2001): The Commission was established by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25-[.]45, the New Jersey State Health Benefits Program Act ... Treasurer, the Commissioner of Insurance and the Commissioner of Personnel. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.27. The Commission has entered into a contract with Blue ... inequity, unnecessary utilization, duplication of services or benefits otherwise available . . . ." N.J.S.A. 52:14- 17.29(B). Under the contract, the traditional plan pays only ...
docket: A2019-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-03-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 90921
52 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5550-14.opn.html -- rank: 512
... 35%. Ibid. We held that this tiered reimbursement system violated N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.46.7, which requires that participating members be reimbursed 80 ... an argument first raised on appeal). Affirmed. 1 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.43, "[t]he certifying agent of each participating employer shall ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 22956
53 TROY POWELL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 507
... levels. See L. 2011, c. 78, § 39 (codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28c). L. 2011, c. 78, § 40, codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28d, requires the increased contributions from employees participating in the ... 2011, c. 78, §§ 43 and 44, codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.34a and N.J.S.A. 40A:5-11.1 ... family coverage. L. 2011, c. 78, § 39 (codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28c). The mandated contributions begin either upon the effective date ...
docket: a3651-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-08-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17360
54 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0370-19.opn.html -- rank: 502
... of cost of medical coverage provided pursuant to Chapter 78. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c). Instead, employee contributions to dental insurance premiums is ... CNA reflects no such agreement. The Arbitrator correctly concluded that N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c) and N.J.A.C. 17:9-9 ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 34279
55 FORT LEE PBA LOCAL NO 245 v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE -- rank: 494
... Contillo in the Chancery Division. Briefly stated, the relevant statute, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a, makes no reference to an arbitration award. The effective ... the language of P.L. 2010, c. 2, § 5 ( N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a) is clear and unambiguous in only extending its effective ... Chancery Division correctly held that the borough was required by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a to deduct 1.5% of employees' base salary for ... 3 P.L. 2010, c. 2, § 5, codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a as relevant to this case, states: Commencing on the ...
docket: a1646-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20606
56 DEBORAH GREEN et al. v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 487
... New Jersey Health Benefits Program Act (the Act) in 1961. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25 to -45. The purpose of the SHBP     is to ... health insurers to provide various benefits plans to program participants. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28. The Act delegates authority to the SHBC to "establish ... deemed reasonable and necessary for the administration of this act." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.27. Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 17:9-2 ...
docket: A2732-03
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2004-12-09
status: published
citation: 373 N.J. Super. 408 861 A.2d 867
Document Size: 29994
57 CITY OF PLAINFIELD v. PBA LOCAL 19, PBA/SOA - -- rank: 482
... of their health care benefit premiums based on annual income. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c). Included in Chapter 78 is N.J.S ... 10-21.2. Additionally, the section binds public employees to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c) and N.J.S.A. 40A:10-21 ... forth in section 39 of P.L. 2011, c. 78 [N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28c] shall conduct negotiations concerning contributions for health care benefits ... 39, 42, and 44 of P.L. 2011, c. 78 [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28c, 40A:10-21.1, and 40A:5A- 11.1 ...
docket: a4435-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-01-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23710
58 MICHAEL SPALLINA v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK -- rank: 472
... in an amount that shall be determined in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28c] . . . . (2) The contribution specified in paragraph (1) of this ... the required years of pension membership credit as outlined in N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28, [Chapter 78] appears to intentionally exclude those who retire ...
docket: a1979-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-21
status: published
citation: 446 N.J.Super. 61 140 A.3d 577
Document Size: 34706
59 MARC S. MENKOWITZ v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 469
... established by the New Jersey State Health Benefits Program Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.24 to -45. Pursuant to a contract with the State ... coverage, make payments on claims, and limit or exclude benefits. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25. 1 The complaint identifies the injured worker only by ...
docket: a0685-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-08-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17284
60 IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR A DECLARATORY RULING FROM THE STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 469
... lacks standing to request a declaratory ruling from the Commission. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 requires SHBP participants to be reimbursed for out-of ...
docket: a3402-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-02-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21627
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!