Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL NO. 260 v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON -- rank: 344

... of their health care benefit premiums based on annual income. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28(c). The Chapter 78 reforms created N.J.S ...

docket:	a1340-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23112

77 JOHN A. MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION, Respondent-Respondent -- rank: 344

... structure of the State Plan. The Commission was established by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25 - 45, The New Jersey State Health Benefits Program Act ...

docket:	A0548-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-02-27
status:	published
citation:	337 N.J. Super. 435
Document Size:	24196

78 ROBERT BARRON v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 344

... years of aggregate service credit in the ABP and TPAF.      N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.32f provides that "[a] qualified retiree from the [TPAF]" and ... benefit based on 25 or more years of service credit." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.32f(a).     The same benefit is available to retirees in ...

docket:	A1687-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-08-23
status:	published
citation:	343 N.J. Super. 583
Document Size:	9601

79 Keddie et al. v. Rutgers, the State University -- rank: 344

... preceding year and stating other facts pertaining to the plan." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.27. The Act, however, does not require that the annual ...

docket:	a-34-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-03-06
status:
citation:	148 N.J. 36
Document Size:	52122

80 In the Matter of BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD - and EAST RUTHERFORD P.B.A LOCAL 275 -- rank: 236

... incurred frustrates the purposes of the State Health Benefits Act, N.J.S.A. § 52:14-17.25 et seq.[,]" and is therefore preempted by that legislation ...

docket:	a1260-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29234