Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 LAUREN COOKE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND - -- rank: 507

... factual findings of lay-witness credibility generally receive deference. See N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) ('The [Board] may not reject or modify any findings ...

docket:	a3167-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34488

182 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4070-18.opn.html -- rank: 507

... 403 N.J. Super. 531, 561 (App. Div. 2008) (quoting N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c)). In its review of the A-4070-18 21 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	38308

183 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES v. G.O. -- rank: 504

... are binding if supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). However, the Director noted that the ALJ did not ... is whether the ALJ's decision relies upon credibility assessments. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) states that The agency head may not reject or ...

docket:	a0427-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25204

184 IN THE MATTER OF L.Y.V MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP -- rank: 501

... decision, but shall state clearly the reasons for doing so." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). Here, the Commission stated clearly its reasons for rejecting ...

docket:	a4290-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22448

185 IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER ANGELINI -- rank: 498

... 343 N.J. Super. 560, 566 (App. Div. 2001), and N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(a), the ALJ noted that in order to prove the ... and, with certain exceptions, "[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(a); N.J.A.C. 1:1-15.1(c ...

docket:	a0874-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33871

186 IN THE MATTER OF EDDIE GONZALEZ -- rank: 498

... long as it sets forth its reasons for doing so. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c); N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.6(b ... by the rules of court. All relevant evidence is admissible . . . ." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(a)(1). Nonetheless, as we have said, the ALJ relied ...

docket:	a2313-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-11-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23908

187 T.L. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION, UNION COUNTY -- rank: 498

... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record.' N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). In this case, following his review of the record ...

docket:	a5566-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48541

188 IN THE MATTER OF ALETHA CROSLAND, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL -- rank: 498

... SHALL BE DEEMED ADOPTED AS THE FINAL DECISION" PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10 BECAUSE THE COMMISSION DID NOT ACT WITHIN THE REQUIRED FORTY ... that she was the aggressor. Crosland's arguments are unpersuasive. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) grants the reviewing administrative agency the power to: reject ... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). "Ordinarily, it is not for a reviewing court or ...

docket:	a3604-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23349

189 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.C. -- rank: 495

... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). Applying those standards to this matter, we conclude that ... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record." N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). "When an ALJ has made factual findings by evaluating ...

docket:	a6381-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44262

190 CHARLES TERRELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 495

... identified declarant). Although hearsay is admissible in an agency hearing, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(a), an adjudication in a disciplinary charge "may not be ...

docket:	a2225-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17797

191 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.K -- rank: 495

... THE TIME AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10 AND N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.8. POINT ...

docket:	a1952-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49359

192 IN THE MATTER OF NOELING H. MILLER, COUNTY OF BURLINGTON -- rank: 492

... by the Director of the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). N.J.S.A. 52-14B-10(c) and (d). If the Board fails to issue its ...

docket:	A0653-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-10-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16203

193 CLEARY T. REED v. ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY -- rank: 492

... to adopt the ALJ's initial decision was appropriate. See N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c); N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.6(a ...

docket:	a0875-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19342

194 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE INVESTIGATION UNIT v. K.T -- rank: 492

... affection[] as she would engage in with her own children.' N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). However, the Assistant Commissioner found the dispute did not ... factual findings were supported in the record as required under N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). The fact that opinions might differ on the severity ...

docket:	a3165-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40280

195 MKI ASSOCIATES, LLC v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT - -- rank: 492

... decision, but shall state clearly the reasons for doing so.' N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). II. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21 ...

docket:	a4508-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31279