Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 54:3-21")   121 to 135 of 191 results. Run time: 0.413 seconds | Search time: 0.410 seconds    
 Page:1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Previous 15 Next 15
121 303 Inc. v. CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD -- rank: 545
... a regular appeal timely filed with the county board under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Ibid. H.G.K.W. Corp. , supra , involved the question ... April 1, 2000. N.J.S.A. 54:51A-9; N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. The error is not of the type correctable under N ...
docket: 06470-03
court:
decided: 2004-06-11
status:
citation: 21 N.J. Tax 376
Document Size: 42671
122 COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL CO. Plaintiff v. WEST DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, <br -- rank: 543
... were either a municipal appeal of the assessment, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, or the filing of a complaint under the correction of ... the amount of an assessment by filing a timely appeal. N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Where an assessor has failed to assess taxable property, i ...
docket: 00020-99
court:
decided: 1999-09-01
status:
citation: 19 N.J. Tax 123
Document Size: 48350
123 Gurvey et al. v. Township of Montclair -- rank: 543
... Court as their assessment was below $1,000,000. See N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Additionally, plaintiffs had not appealed the County Board’s judgment ...
docket: 000339-11
court:
decided: 2012-02-23
status:
citation:
Document Size: 72834
124 NJ Transit Corp. v. Somerville Borough -- rank: 540
... boards of taxation is April 1 of the tax year. N.J.S.A . 54:3-21. Failure of a taxpayer to timely contest an assessment to ... by township was dismissed for failure to pursue timely claims). N.J.S.A . 54:3-21 provides an annual filing deadline for both taxpayers and taxing ... derived in part from assessments on property of government entities. N.J.S.A . 54:3-21 expressly and specifically requires a taxpayer and taxing district to ... 1981) (state agency held subject to timely filing requirement of N.J.S.A . 54:3-21). 3 The Legislature changed the filing date from August 15 ...
docket: 03046-92
court:
decided: 1993-07-27
status:
citation: 13 N.J. Tax 339
Document Size: 38051
125 GEMENESE REALTY L.L.C. v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE -- rank: 540
... required to appeal the assessments in a timely fashion. Under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, an aggrieved taxpayer, such as EOHA, must appeal an assessment ...
docket: a1929-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-11-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44402
126 CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. LOIS FINIFTER, et al. -- rank: 540
... was entered, Atlantic City endeavored to amend the complaint under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 to challenge the assessment, and then unsuccessfully tried to have ... and Atlantic City can advance its arguments in that case. N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 ("An appeal to the Tax Court by one party in ... City's remedy is now by a tax appeal. See N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Accordingly, we dismiss both appeals without prejudice, and remand the ...
docket: A2784-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-06-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32207
127 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/009434-20.opn.html -- rank: 535
... shall be governed by the procedures provided for appeals in [ N.J.S.A. ] 54:3-21.” N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.13b (emphasis added). N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 however only provides the deadlines and the dollar thresholds for ... acre portion only in the context of an appeal under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Such an appeal, and disposition thereof by the County Board ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 30801
128 Pella LLC v City of Cape May\t -- rank: 530
... taxpayer has until April 1st to file a tax appeal. N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Strict enforcement of short filing deadlines is necessary so municipal ...
docket: 013605-20
court: tax
decided: 2024-05-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31402
129 BLLUM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VS BLOOMFIELD TWP. -- rank: 530
... requirements, and is distinct from the filing deadline imposed by N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. See footnote 1 Finally, Bllum argues that N.J.S ...
docket: a2900-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-10-08
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 19291
130 NEW JERSEY APARTMENT ASSOCIATION INC., ET AL., VS SOCIETY HILL APARTMENT ASSOCIATION L.P. ET AL -- rank: 528
... for tax appeals, now April 1 of the given year, N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, and by the three-month window given county tax boards ...
docket: a1364-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-09-29
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 23799
131 MARIA PADILLA v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 528
... appeal would have expired no later than April 1, 2010. N.J.S.A. 54:3-21(a)(1) (stating that a taxpayer who feels "aggrieved by ...
docket: a0127-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-12-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35586
132 CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, A Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DIRECTOR DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant. -- rank: 528
... 1 deadline for taxpayers (and municipalities) to file appeals under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, including taxpayer appeals seeking exemption from taxation. N.J.S ...
docket: 00664-97
court:
decided: 1999-10-25
status:
citation: 18 N.J. Tax 291
Document Size: 54267
133 SHELBOURNE SPRING LLC, v. NEW PROVIDENCE BOROUGH -- rank: 525
... of appeal was filed after the statutory deadline imposed in N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. See 18 N.J. Tax at 624 . The court, after ...
docket: 013528-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-04-07
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27706
134 Montclair Hospital, LLC v. Glen Ridge Borough -- rank: 510
... MPT Legacy, is an aggrieved taxpayer within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, and thus possessed standing to file the local property tax ...
docket: 012319-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-07-26
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 82097
135 BEACH CREEK MARINA INC v. CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD -- rank: 507
... writ action would "flout the statutorily mandated [appeal] procedure of N.J.S.A. 54:3-21" and "contravene the policy behind it." We agree. N.J ... undermining the purposes of the statutorily mandated appeal procedure of N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 is consistent with this court's decision in Appeal of ... we upheld the board's ruling. The panel reasoned that N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 controls tax appeals and that its time limits are "jurisdictional ...
docket: a2590-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-05-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20048
 Page:1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!