Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/000490-20.opn.html -- rank: 717

... ready for the use for which it was intended.” N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1. If construction has reached the point when it cannot be ...

docket:	000490-20
court:	NJ Tax Court
decided:	2017-08-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42076

17 PRINCETON SOUTH INVESTORS, LLC v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 714

... delinquent. . . . . 3. Subject to added or omitted assessments pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 et seq. not yet due and payable . [Emphasis added.] It ...

docket:	a0850-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-08
status:	published
citation:	437 N.J.Super. 283 97 A.3d 1190
Document Size:	54130

18 CITY OF ASBURY PARK v. CASTAGNO TIRES -- rank: 709

... 73b. "Completion" is similarly defined in the Added Assessment Law. N.J.S.A . 54:4-63.1. For purposes of the Added Assessment Law, this Court has ...

docket:	12905-92
court:
decided:	1993-09-27
status:
citation:	13 N.J. Tax 488
Document Size:	96509

19 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. v. CITY OF MILLVILLE -- rank: 693

... provision. This court, however, has interpreted a similar statutory provision, N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1, concerning added assessments. That provision defines “completed” as � ... ready for the use for which it was intended.” N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1. This court has held that a structure “is taxable ...

docket:	10784-07
court:
decided:	2010-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44007

20 TEICHER AMERICAN COMMUNITIES AT THE MAJESTIC, LLC v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK -- rank: 687

... 2005. Nothing in the Added Assessment of Real Estate Law, N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 to -63.11a, or the statutes governing the filing of ...

docket:	a5283-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32354

21 AVR REALTY CO. V. CRANFORD TWP. -- rank: 626

... was intended" or that it was, in fact, so used. N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1. See also Beranto Towers v. City of Passaic , 1 N ...

docket:	a3117-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-10-22
status:	published
citation:	294 N.J.Super. 294
Document Size:	23422

22 AVR REALTY CO., C/O ROSE VS CRANFORD TOWNSHIP -- rank: 605

... plaintiff. ����Here, the Tax Court judge did not focus upon N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 to -63.11, and the Omitted Assessment Law, N.J ...

docket:	a6837-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-01
status:	published
citation:	316 N.J.Super. 401
Document Size:	14309

23 RICHARD et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR, <br -- rank: 594

... after the October 1 assessing date for the tax year. N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 to 63.3). Of those 139 adjustments, sixty had been ...

docket:	07888-97
court:
decided:	1999-07-22
status:
citation:	18 N.J. Tax 200
Document Size:	37504

24 HILLCREST HEALTH SERVICE SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff v. OPINION HACKENSACK CITY, -- rank: 573

... of the property. Accordingly, he imposed an added assessment under N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 et seq . Pursuant to the added assessment statute, he determined ...

docket:	08422-92
court:
decided:	1998-11-20
status:
citation:	18 N.J. Tax 38
Document Size:	49914

25 200 43RD STREET, L.L.C. v. CITY OF UNION CITY -- rank: 541

... was intended within the purview of the added assessment statute, N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1, until March 25, 1996, when the certificate of occupancy was ...

docket:	01019-96
court:
decided:	1996-10-18
status:
citation:	16 N.J. Tax 138
Document Size:	25398