Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 RICHARD SIMON v. CATHERINE H. RANDO, et al. -- rank: 693

... N.J.S.A. 54:5-98.     Neither the statutes, N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, N.J.S.A. 54:5-89.1, N.J ...

docket:	A0262-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-01-06
status:	published
citation:	374 N.J. Super. 147 863 A.2d 107
Document Size:	28676

17 CRUSADER SERVICING CORPORATION v. JUAN DEMARZINO, et al. -- rank: 677

... promise is called a "covenant as to grantor's acts" ( N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 as not timely. On February 18, 2004, M&T filed ... judgment. Crusader also argues: (1) the three-month proscription in N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 trumps R. 4:50-2 and, therefore, the judge should ... reasonable time," namely the three-month statutory limitation prescribed in N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. However, our courts have routinely applied the time limitations embodied ... disagreement is immaterial because the stay applies irrespective of knowledge. N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 states in pertinent part, "no application shall be entertained to ...

docket:	A2930-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62245

18 ROYAL TAX LIEN SERVICES, LLC v. JOSEPH MORODAN -- rank: 662

... certificate becomes the owner of the property in fee simple. N.J.S.A. 54:5 87. [ Simon v. Cronecker , 189 N.J. 304 , 318 (2007) (citation ... judgment, and then only for fraud or lack of jurisdiction, N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, our court rules allow one year in which to do ...

docket:	a1211-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35126

19 M & D ASSOCIATES v. PHILIP MANDARA and CARMELO MANDARA -- rank: 647

... judgment of foreclosure. While the tax sale law states in N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 that "no application shall be entertained to reopen the judgment ...

docket:	a4223-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-06
status:	published
citation:	366 N.J. Super. 341
Document Size:	36617

20 CRESTAR CAPITAL, L.L.C. v. MANUEL L RIBEIRO -- rank: 641

... In denying the motion, she concluded defendants did not satisfy N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 (establishing deadlines and criterion for re-opening judgments in tax ... service of process; the court erred in its application of N.J.S.A. 54:5-87; they established excusable neglect and a meritorious defense; and the ... member of the household. The judge properly considered and applied N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, which provides that "no application shall be entertained to reopen ... motion for relief from a tax sale foreclosure judgment, notwithstanding N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. See M & D Assocs. v. Mandara , 366 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a5624-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18767

21 BV001 REO Blocker, LLC v. 53 WEST SOMERSET STREET PROPERTIES, LLC -- rank: 635

... of jurisdiction or fraud in the conduct of the suit.' N.J.S.A. 54:5-87; see also N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.67 ... limitation in an in rem tax foreclosure). We have interpreted N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 to permit relief from judgment, within three months, for any ...

docket:	a0419-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	29239

22 LILLIAN ZHANG v. GOSHEN MORTGAGE REO LLC -- rank: 635

... their property, but to provide a method for collecting taxes . . . .'). N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 precludes a court from entertaining an 'application . . . to reopen the ... fraud in the conduct of the suit.' We have interpreted N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 to permit relief from judgment, within three months, for any ...

docket:	a1957-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-04-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47944

23 MARK PROPERTIES, LLC v. DAVID WILSCHANSKI -- rank: 632

... that defendant's request for relief was time-barred under N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, which sets a three-month limit for motions to vacate ... for relief from a tax sale foreclosure judgment, notwithstanding that N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 bars relief after three months from the date of judgment ... was not bound by the three-month limitation period under N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 because plaintiff committed a "fraud in the conduct of the ...

docket:	a4120-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38233

24 SF1 REAL ESTATE 1, LLC v. MARKO MELNITSCHENKO -- rank: 617

... jurisdiction or fraud in the conduct of t he suit,' N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, Rule 4:50-1 governs a motion for relief from a tax sale foreclosure judgment, notwithstanding N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. See M & D Assocs. v. Mandara, 366 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a2003-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	1992-00-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34022

25 A.S.C. CORPORATION v. RICHARD O. VENINO, JR. -- rank: 613

... certificate becomes the owner of the property in fee simple. N.J.S.A. 54:5-87." Ibid. Thus, tax sale certificate holders are "entitled to reimbursement ...

docket:	A2453-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46445

26 MILESTONE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC v. YAAKOV KAPLAN -- rank: 601

... further asserted that Wells Fargo's motion was untimely under N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. Milestone also argued that Wells Fargo's motion should have ... Lot 18.01. 6 We reject Milestone's reliance on N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. The Court Rule governs a motion for relief from a tax sale foreclosure judgment, notwithstanding that N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 bars relief after three months from the date of judgment ...

docket:	a1765-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33120

27 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1604-19.opn.html -- rank: 598

... J. Super. 313, 319 (App. Div. 1964)). In accordance with N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, a foreclosure judgment 'shall be final . . . and no application shall ... SHMI's motion to vacate was timely, whether considered under N.J.S.A. 54:5-87 or our court rules. Rule 4:50-2 requires that ... 50-2, as well as the three-month deadline under N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. The motion judge did not abuse his discretion in vacating ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17933

28 Rock v. ASHRAF SHAKER -- rank: 586

... certificate becomes the owner of the property in fee simple. N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. [ Simon v. Cronecker , 189 N.J. 304 , 318 (2007) (third ...

docket:	a2392-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26259

29 INDIAN FIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC v. MR. FRANK CICERALE -- rank: 562

... of jurisdiction or fraud in the conduct of the suit.' N.J.S.A. 54:5-87. Additionally, N.J.S.A. 54:5-26 specifies that ...

docket:	a3687-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56161

30 IVY HOLDINGS, LLC v. KAREEM MUHAMMAD -- rank: 562

... reopening a tax sale judgment under the Tax Sale Law, N.J.S.A. 54:5-87, which we note was satisfied here, reflects the Legislature's ...

docket:	a4639-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33019