Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

226 JRM LANDSCAPING v. CAROL STROUMTSOS -- rank: 401

... Div.), certif. denied , 178 N.J. 249 (2003)); see also N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The alleged misrepresentation or omission must be material. Cole v ...

docket:	a1269-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37941

227 CHASE BANK USA, N.A v. JENNIFER STAFFENBERG -- rank: 398

... 135, was that counsel fees recoverable in CFA actions under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 are not to be considered part of the "amount in ...

docket:	a4488-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-11
status:	published
citation:	419 N.J. Super. 386 17 A.3d 239
Document Size:	83732

228 PASTOR JOSEPH SHIN v. BERGENFIELD SENIOR HOUSING LLC. -- rank: 398

... 21.1, and treble damages against all defendants pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 for violation of the CFA. Specifically, plaintiffs contend when BSH ...

docket:	a1563-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32648

229 GALE ROSENTHAL v. TEDDY MACALLAN GROUP INC. -- rank: 398

... of an act or practice declared unlawful under the CFA. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Here, the court instructed the jury, "[i]f plaintiff has ...

docket:	a0465-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18867

230 SARA BACON v. BOB CIASULLI AUTO GROUP, INC -- rank: 396

... work, and the law requires that that award be trebled, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. We cannot reach the merits of defendant's Point III ...

docket:	a4914-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13715

231 HAROLD M. HOFFMAN v. HAMPSHIRE LABS, INC. -- rank: 396

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under [the] act[.]" N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The CFA therefore allows "a private cause of action, but ...

docket:	a3401-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-01-30
status:	published
citation:	405 N.J.Super. 105
Document Size:	48695

232 VIVIAN YING v. FRANK LI -- rank: 396

... which Li did not challenge, and entered judgment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 in the amount of $22,264.85 for plaintiffs' reasonable ...

docket:	a5728-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25658

233 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. JOHN KINGSBURY -- rank: 393

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under this act . . . .' N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Thus, '[t]o prevail on a CFA claim, a plaintiff ...

docket:	a0249-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39242

234 MONOGRAM CREDIT CARD BANK OF GEORGIA v. ROBERT C. TENNESEN -- rank: 393

... was $2000 which reflected Tennesen's "ascertainable loss." Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19, he trebled those damages, entered judgment for Tennesen in the ...

docket:	a6267-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-01-23
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 123
Document Size:	53709

235 YOGESH SHAH v. AMAZON HOME WARRANTY SERVICE -- rank: 391

... at 190. III. 'The treble damages remedy 'is mandatory under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 if a consumer-fraud plaintiff proves both an unlawful practice ...

docket:	a1442-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20929

236 KAREN B. TURNER v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC -- rank: 391

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under [the] act[.]" N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. An "ascertainable loss" means an "actual loss." Thiedemann v. Mercedes ...

docket:	a3653-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	38805

237 GERARDO GONZALEZ v. AUTO MALL 46, INC -- rank: 388

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under this act . . ." N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. T he CFA may apply to sales that affect consumers ...

docket:	a5673-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47047

238 CYNTHIA TOPOLESKI AND EUGENE W. TOPOLESKI v. OLIGERT VESHI and DEBORAH DAVIS -- rank: 388

... Reed Co., LLC, 203 N.J. 496, 521 (2010) (citing N.J.S.A. 56:8-19). Among the proscriptions in the Act are the use or ...

docket:	a1820-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29078

239 SOON JA KANG et al. v. SOON JA KANG and CHUK WOOK KANG -- rank: 388

... whenever a practice made unlawful by the Act is proven. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Even though the jury's findings did not result in ...

docket:	A2042-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71193

240 KING PLAZA RESIDENTIAL v. TEOFILA SANCHEZ -- rank: 385

... considered only "if compensatory damages have been awarded"); see also N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (requiring "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss of ...

docket:	a5811-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19553