Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 JENNIFER WOO-PADVA v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC -- rank: 579

... deceptive and unconscionable business practices in violation of the CFA, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, by filing collection complaints when it lacked the proper license ... any person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] The CFA defines 'merchandise' as 'any objects, wares ... Co., 138 N.J. 2, 17-18 (1994); see also N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. 'Under the CFA, '[t]he misrepresentation has to be one ...

docket:	a1996-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-09-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34992

107 JRM LANDSCAPING v. CAROL STROUMTSOS -- rank: 579

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] The term "merchandise" within the CFA covers not only goods ...

docket:	a1269-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37941

108 PAUL PROFETA v. TOWN SPORTS INTERNATIONAL LIVINGSTON -- rank: 577

... violations. The first two are found in the language of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and the third is based on regulations enacted under N ... 7. Profeta relies solely on the 'unlawful practices' identified in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2: The act, use or employment by any person of any ... with 'incompetence' than with an 'unlawful practice' as defined in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Concepcion's testimony, which the court referenced and obviously credited ...

docket:	a1805-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31580

109 JOHN M. GATELY v. HAMILTON MEMORIAL HOME INC -- rank: 577

... cemetery operations within other states). 17 A-4458-13T 2 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, as evidence that the Legislature intended for the statute's ...

docket:	a4458-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-10-22
status:	published
citation:	442 N.J.Super. 542 125 A.3d 747
Document Size:	60218

110 SHERMAN V. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. -- rank: 577

... that New Jersey's Retail Installment Sales Act of 1960, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, -19. Finally, plaintiff contends that the imposition of late-payment ...

docket:	a-102-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-11-28
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 35
Document Size:	152600

111 JOHN ARTHUR ROBINSON v. 160 SPRING VALLEY RD LLC -- rank: 577

... Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 20 (1994) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). 'The [CFA] is not violated absent any 'unconscionable commercial practice ... 232 N.J. Super. 69, 72 (App. Div. 1989) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). '[A] simple breach of . . . contract is not per se unconscionable ... 206 N.J. Super. 11, 31 (App. Div. 1985) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). Affirmed. A-1271-21 23 This archive is a service ...

docket:	a1271-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40894

112 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2658-16a2659-16.opn.html -- rank: 575

... because the process of extracting those agreements was barred by N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22, which requires that copies of contracts be provided to ... 2658-16T4 Amicus's arguments chiefly address the effect of N.J.S.A. 56:8- 2.22 in such matters. III We first consider certain general ... ever formed; (b) whether, in both cases, defendants complied with N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22, and (c) whether – with the agreements to rescind ... Plaintiffs, as well as amicus, emphasize the potential impact of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 on the arbitrability of plaintiffs' claims. That CFA provision ... not be enforced. Although the effect of a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 has not been considered in any reported decision,9 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	57965

113 EDWARD HAYES v. RODNEY YOUMAN -- rank: 575

... a corporation. Id. at 131 (citing A-3205-18T1 28 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). The Court made clear, however, that 'individuals were not liable ...

docket:	a3205-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56174

114 ROBERT HENRY, JR., et al. v. SOMERTIME POOL & SPA SERVICE, INC. -- rank: 575

... of $7,009.50 and denied plaintiffs' application, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11, for a refund of the $18,224 swimming pool ... ascertainable loss." Plaintiffs further argue that they were entitled, under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11, to a refund of the full pool purchase price ... need not determine definitively whether Judge Fisher correctly concluded that N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 relates solely to the misrepresentation of identity of food ... intended to supplement the 1960 Consumer Fraud Act. Ibid. See N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.9 to -2.13. By 1979 when this supplemental act ... provide specifically for a private action to collect the refund. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.12, nevertheless, provides that the refund "may be recovered in ... N.J. Super. 75 , 88-89 (Law Div. 2005)(applying N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 to sprinkler installation contract), and In re F ...

docket:	A1179-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16858

115 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/ber-l-1177-12.opn.html -- rank: 573

... 199 N.J. 251, 971 A.2d 1054 (2009) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). The statute defines merchandise as ²any objects, wares, goods ...

docket:	BER-L-1177-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size:	36016

116 MARTIN B. JUDGE v. BLACKFIN YACHT CORPORATION, BYC ACQUISITION CORPORATION et al. -- rank: 573

... an action for relief under the Consumer Fraud Act (Act). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 provides that unconscionable commercial practices, including "deception, fraud, false pretense ...

docket:	A2815-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-02-13
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	24477

117 KENNETH JECAS v. D&R BOATS -- rank: 573

... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Such practices can be divided into three general categories: affirmative ... intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission," N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added). Proof of any one of those acts or ...

docket:	a3020-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40238

118 ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC v. AA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY -- rank: 573

... declared to be an unlawful practice. A-3813-17T4 27 [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 'Sale' in the CFA is defined to 'include any sale ...

docket:	a3813-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53655

119 SOOM DAT POKHAN v. TYRONE PETERS -- rank: 573

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "The term 'merchandise' shall include any objects , wares, goods, commodities ... App. Div. 1976), alternate issue in holding superseded by statute , N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 ("There is no provision that the claimant thereunder must have ...

docket:	a6120-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36187

120 Alloway v. General Marine Industries, L.P. -- rank: 573

... in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.]     Another statute, the Truth-In-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice ...

docket:	a-48-96
court:
decided:	1997-06-30
status:
citation:	145 N.J. 372
Document Size:	79191