Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 CHRISTOPHER KEMP v. THE ESTATE OF MARIJANE BRANDAU -- rank: 560

... Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 17-18 (1994); N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. A CFA violation by omission 'requires proof that the offending ...

docket:	a4161-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68050

137 JOSEPH NUZZO and SUSANNE NUZZO v. ROBERT M. HORVATH -- rank: 560

... Ins. Co. of Am. , 142 N.J. 520 , 529 (1995). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 provides that "[t]he act, use or employment by any ...

docket:	a5323-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48411

138 ALEX J. KNELLER v. NARAYON HOSJ GANESAN, et al. -- rank: 557

... in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added)] In order for an act or omission to ...

docket:	A0928-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55045

139 GERARDO GONZALEZ v. AUTO MALL 46, INC -- rank: 555

... person as aforesaid . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] An action for a violation of the CFA may be ...

docket:	a5673-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47047

140 UNION INK CO., INC., et al. v. AT&T CORP., et al. -- rank: 555

... person "has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Accord Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors , 148 N.J. 582 ...

docket:	A0804-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-06-28
status:	published
citation:	352 N.J. Super. 617 801 A.2d 361
Document Size:	75703

141 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5391-18.opn.html -- rank: 553

... Yacht Sales, Inc., 110 N.J. 464, 473 (1988) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2); see also Weinberg v. Spring Corp., 173 N.J. 233 ... the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate . . . . [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] An ascertainable loss must be a 'definite, certain and measurable ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	41936

142 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. ATHENA KOSTOPOULOS -- rank: 553

... argue t hat plaintiff violated the Consumer Fraud Act, specifically N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, by concealing the Lehman credit as well as the use ...

docket:	a1041-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49786

143 Roxanne Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors -- rank: 551

... American Jeep, Inc. 72 N.J. 372, 376-77 (1977).      N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 contains the operative language:         The act, use or employment by ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Notwithstanding the purchasers' inquiries, the fact remains that Weichert agents ...

docket:	a-75-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-04-15
status:
citation:	148 N.J. 582
Document Size:	96873

144 FRANK GREEK AND SON INC v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC. -- rank: 551

... sales tax constituted an unconscionable commercial practice in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and brought a complaint on behalf of herself and all ...

docket:	a1928-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48477

145 AMBER MONSERRATE v. BD AUTO SALES, INC -- rank: 551

... or damages thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] An 'unlawful practice' that violates the CFA may be established ... necessary if the claimed violation is an omission pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8- - 2.' Ibid. (citing Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc., 197 N.J ... that defendant engaged in conduct deemed to be unlawful under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 because 'it clearly misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to ... knowing omission or concealment, which is an unlawful practice under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Defendant further argues that the trial court erred by finding ... s finding that defendant engaged in an unlawful practice under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 by A-2119-17T2 11 knowingly concealing the condition of ...

docket:	a2119-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-12
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26545

146 CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN v. ANTHONY E. D'AMICO -- rank: 549

... person must commit an "unlawful practice," either as described in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 or the regulations permitted under N.J.S.A. 56 ... elevate the breach to the level of "unconscionable commercial practice." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Compare Cox , supra , 138 N.J. at 20 (finding that ...

docket:	a1448-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47288

147 JOY SYSTEMS, INC v. FIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -- rank: 549

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 11 A-5373-15T4 'The standard of conduct that the ... or omission of any material fact . . . .' Id. at 19 (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). Consumer fraud by omission necessarily includes that a defendant's ...

docket:	a5373-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62132

148 ESTATE OF ERNEST H PAULI v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. ESTATE OF ERNEST H PAULI v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. -- rank: 549

... Sears Roebuck & Co. , 138 N.J. 2 , 17-19 (1994). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 provides, in relevant part: The act, use or employment by ...

docket:	a4851-12 a4851-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-05 2015-05-05
status:	unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70070

149 MARIA TLATELPA v. MAURICIO TORRES -- rank: 549

... 20 8 III. We first address contentions regarding the CFA. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 defines '[f]raud . . . in connection with the sale or advertisement ... the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate[.] [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In Zaman v. Felton, the Supreme Court explained, '[t]o ... defendant 'committed an 'unconscionable business practice' within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2[]' because 'Zaman did not advertise real estate services to the ...

docket:	a1226-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26204

150 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1077-17.opn.html -- rank: 547

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] N.J.S.A. 56:8-1(c ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	50258