Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 SHARON S. PARK v. THE KUKEN, LLC -- rank: 722

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Courts interpreting this language have divided unlawful practices 'for analytical ... the purposes of finding an unlawful practice under the CFA. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. We agree and affirm Judge A-0853-19 25 O ... and constituted unlawful acts within the meaning of the CFA. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. A-0853-19 28 C. As already noted, Judge O ... been part of the violation. Id. at 130-33 (citing N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). Here, the record indicates, and as plaintiff's counsel confirmed ...

docket:	a0853-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-01-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56517

17 539 ABSECON BOULEVARD, L.L.C. v. SHAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -- rank: 715

... begin with a textual review of the statute. According to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2: The act, use or employment by any person of any ... Lube Connection, Inc. , 162 N.J. 134 , 139 (1999). Although N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 uses the phrase "unconscionable commercial practices," the unlawful practices enumerated ...

docket:	a2250-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-26
status:	published
citation:	406 N.J. Super. 242 967 A.2d 845
Document Size:	128067

18 MARK GLUKOWSKY v. EQUITY ONE, INC. -- rank: 715

... of-state associations having a branch office in New Jersey). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. It also provides for a private right of action, to recover monies lost as a result of such practices, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.12, and states that the rights protected under the Act ... cumulative of other rights and remedies under New Jersey law. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13. New Jersey Licensed Lenders Act     Defendant is licensed as ...

docket:	A3202-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-04-24
status:	published
citation:	360 N.J. Super. 1 821 A.2d 485
Document Size:	125502

19 Martin Weinberg v. Sprint Corporation -- rank: 713

... prove that the victim was damaged by the unlawful conduct, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, a private plaintiff must show that he or she suffered ... permit individual consumers to bring private actions to recover refunds, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 to –2.12, and treble damages for violations, N ... recover refunds for losses caused by violations of the Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 to –2.12. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 states: “Any person violating the provisions of the within ... by means of any practice declared herein to be unlawful.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.12 states: “The refund of moneys provided may be recovered ...

docket:	a-36-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2002-07-22
status:
citation:	173 N.J. 233
Document Size:	72858

20 Allen v. V and A Bros., Inc. -- rank: 711

... CFA’s operative provision that creates a cause of action, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2; and the three “Home Improvement Practices” regulations that formed ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In addition to these statutory provisions, our analysis of individual ... defined as a violation of the statute’s protections. See N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. In analyzing the meaning of that operative provision of the ... suppression or omission of any material fact,” if intentional, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. In addition, by referring to “unconscionable commercial practice[s ...

docket:	a-30-10
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-07-07
status:
citation:
Document Size:	99739

21 VADIM MELNYCHUK v. MOSHE'S AUTO REPAIR CORP -- rank: 708

... causal relationship between the two. Id. at 184; see also N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The CFA itself bars "any unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud ... intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The CFA also required the promulgation of "regulations necessary to ...

docket:	a5367-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-10-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	44944

22 Lyle Real v. Radir Wheels, Inc. and Richard Conklin -- rank: 706

... sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. “Advertisement” includes the attempt to induce a person to ... CFA prohibits certain acts performed by “any person,” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and the statutory definition of “person,” N.J ... sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate[.]” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. In this context, giving full expression to the plain words ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] It defines an “advertisement” to “include the attempt ... CFA prohibits certain acts performed by “any person,” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and the statutory definition of “person,” N.J ...

docket:	a-26-08
court:
decided:	2009-04-08
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 511
Document Size:	73657

23 BRIAN HEYERT v. MENASSIE TADDESE -- rank: 706

... 389 (2007); Cox , supra , 138 N.J. at 17. Under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, "affirmative acts" are defined as "unlawful practices that include unconscionable ...

docket:	a4801-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-25
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 388 70 A.3d 680
Document Size:	128038

24 Margaret L. Lee v. First Union National Bank, et al. -- rank: 698

... the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. "Merchandise" includes "any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services or anything ... terms "real estate" or "securities." In 1976, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 to prohibit fraudulent or deceptive practices "in connection with the ... in the definition of merchandise or in the text of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Based on that history, the Appellate Division, in Neveroski v ... that CFA "represents a legislative broadside against unsavory commercial practices). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 prohibits, as an unlawful practice, the "act, use or employment ... 365 , 377 (App. Div. 1976) (emphasis added), superseded by statute , N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. In its analysis, the Appellate Division noted that the original ...

docket:	a-58-08
court:
decided:	2009-06-03
status:
citation:
Document Size:	87516

25 ELIZABETH KAWA v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION SHOPRITE SUPERMARKETS, INC. -- rank: 693

... connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise . . . .” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The Consumer Fraud Act not only protects consumers from â ... in purchasing merchandise from the defendants, all in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. It is further alleged that defendants knowingly misrepresented the facts ...

docket:	08717-06
court:
decided:	2008-04-03
status:
citation:
Document Size:	63233

26 Melissa Lee v. Carter-Reed Company, L.L.C. -- rank: 691

... engaged in an “unlawful practice,” as defined in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and that she “suffer[ed] [an] ascertainable loss . . . as ... connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise . . . .” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. A dietary supplement, such as Relacore, is merchandise under the ... if Carter Reed engaged in the deceptive marketing of Relacore, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and plaintiff and the class members suffered an ascertainable loss ...

docket:	a-38-09
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2010-09-29
status:
citation:	203 N.J. 496 4 A.3d 561
Document Size:	118944

27 Glenn Ollendorf v. LACEL MONK -- rank: 684

... the repairs, the judge awarded plaintiff $1,300, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11. However, the judge did not treble the damages, concluding ... rescission was not a remedy available to plaintiff, nor does N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 create such a remedy for violation of the CFA ... other right, remedy, or prohibition accorded by the common law . . . ." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13. Moreover, in this matter, plaintiff did not plead rescission ...

docket:	a5031-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	59269

28 0ATLANTIC AMBULANCE CORPORATION v. JOHN G. CULLUM -- rank: 684

... estate, thereby abrogating the court's holding in Neveroski . See N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The Neveroski decision remains instructive as it supports the CFA ...

docket:	a1622-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-29
status:	unpublished
citation:	451 N.J.Super. 247 166 A.3d 260
Document Size:	47630

29 DebraAnn Lombardi v. Christopher J. Masso, et al. -- rank: 682

... the CFA did not apply to realtors was erroneous. See N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (declaring CFA applies to fraud and misrepresentation “in connection ... no cognizable cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. 14 Plaintiff sought reconsideration, which was denied on August 3 ...

docket:	A-28-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2011-08-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	165115

30 Manahawkin Convalescent v. Frances O’Neill -- rank: 680

... of suit.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 identifies the type of conduct that constitutes an “unlawful ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] The statute defines sale as “any sale, . . . offer for ...

docket:	A-17-12
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2014-03-11
status:
citation:
Document Size:	98245