Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 56:8-2")   46 to 60 of 365 results. Run time: 0.668 seconds | Search time: 0.661 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
46 DAVID S. MATHIESEN v. DAVID MOLESKI -- rank: 636
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] The CFA defines "merchandise" as "any objects, wares ... We note that defendants relied on the case law interpreting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, not on the administrative regulations contained in N.J.A ...
docket: a0365-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-08-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 71852
47 ESTATE OF NANCY Z PALEY v. BANK OF AMERICA -- rank: 634
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "Merchandise" is defined as "any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services ...
docket: a5519-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-04-29
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 52651
48 ESTATE OF NANCY Z PALEY v. BANK OF AMERICA -- rank: 634
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "Merchandise" is defined as "any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services ...
docket: a5864-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-04-29
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 52651
49 ESTATE OF NANCY Z PALEY v. BANK OF AMERICA -- rank: 634
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "Merchandise" is defined as "any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services ...
docket: a4391-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-04-29
status: published
citation: 420 N.J. Super. 39 18 A.3d 1033
Document Size: 52820
50 Tahir Zaman v. Barbara Felton -- rank: 630
... because he committed no unlawful practice within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and because it was he, not Felton, who was defrauded ... the sale or advertisement of real estate, in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. To prevail on a CFA claim, a plaintiff must establish ... Fund v. Merck & Co. , 192 N.J. 372 , 389 (2007). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 defines an “unlawful practice” to include any unconscionable commercial ... committed an “unconscionable commercial practice” within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Accordingly, the trial court properly dismissed Felton’s CFA claim ...
docket: A-60-12
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2014-09-09
status:
citation: 219 N.J. 199 98 A.3d 503
Document Size: 105009
51 LOUIS SICKLES v. CABOT CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 627
... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] The phrase "unconscionable commercial practice[,]" added to the definition of "unlawful practice" in l971, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, L. 1971, c. 247, 1 (June 29, 1971), has been ...
docket: A3129-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2005-07-07
status: published
citation: 379 N.J. Super. 100 877 A.2d 267
Document Size: 88229
52 THOMAS ROMOND et al. v. VALIANT HOME REMODELERS and GREAT LAKES WINDOW, INC. -- rank: 625
... asserted that these facts established an affirmative-act violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 as an unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, or misrepresentation. The ... refusing to charge all of the affirmative acts specified in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and some of the provisions of the Home Improvement Practices ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] The trial judge read this statute to the jury in ... the reach of the CFA extends to subsequent performance. See N .J.S.A. 56:8-2. It also contended that this evidence was admissible as evidence ...
docket: a5140-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-08-21
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 105038
53 COX V. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY -- rank: 625
... involves at the very least an 'unconscionable commercial practice,'" (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 and Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc. , 187 N.J. Super ... violations. The first two are found in the language of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and the third is based on regulations enacted under N ...
docket: a-123-93
court: njsupreme
decided: 1994-09-15
status:
citation: 138 N.J. 2
Document Size: 51551
54 ROXANNE GENNARI V. WEICHERT CO. REALTORS AND TIMERLINE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT INC. ET AL -- rank: 623
... liability only, finding Weichert liable under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, as the sole proximate cause of plaintiffs' damages resulting from ... finding defendant, Weichert Realty, liable under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, as the sole proximate cause, of defective conditions relating to ... at 25. Unconscionable practices fall into two general categories under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, affirmative acts and knowing omissions. Strawn , supra , 271 N.J ... 1991). Weichert asserts that, here, the trial judge mistakenly interpreted N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 as not requiring a knowledge or intent element where an ... just "any erroneous statement" will constitute a misrepresentation prohibited by N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The misrepresentation has to be one which is material to ... its Consumer Fraud Act tracked nearly verbatim the language of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Section 2 of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive ...
docket: a5712-93
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-03-15
status: published
citation: 288 N.J.Super. 504
Document Size: 104361
55 Delgado v. LVNV Funding -- rank: 619
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] Merchandise is defined as “any objects, wares ... does not allege defendants engaged in the sale of merchandise, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and committed unlawful conduct in connection with that. The CFA ... “subsequent performance” of the contract within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, relying on Jefferson Loan Co. v. Session, 397 N.J ...
docket: BER_L-418-23
court: trial
decided: 2024-04-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40779
56 ROBERT CAMERON v. TGI FRIDAYS, INC -- rank: 619
... support a claim under the CFA, specifically a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, which mandates point-of-sale disclosure of the price of merchandise at retail, and N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, which declares certain unconscionable commercial practices to be unlawful. Id ... menus for certain beverages. Plaintiffs allege TGIF's practice violates N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, and constitutes an unconscionable commercial practice in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. However, in order to obtain damages, each plaintiff must show ...
docket: a3485-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-03-24
status: published
citation: 445 N.J.Super. 59 135 A.3d 1003
Document Size: 51654
57 Janell Goffe v. Foulke Management Corp. -- rank: 617
... issue, in both cases, regarding the import of compliance with N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 of the CFA, which requires a seller to provide ... State has considered “the effect of a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22” on the enforceability of a consumer agreement; however, the ... copies of the documents to plaintiffs in compliance with 18 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 “is a question of disputed fact” that must ... plaintiffs copies of the contracts they signed, in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22, should be decided by the arbitrator.10 Under these ... including the question of remedy for any alleged violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22. In the same vein, plaintiffs’ claims that they rescinded ...
docket: a-3-4-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-06-05
status:
citation:
Document Size: 70285
58 ROBERT KILBURN v. MT. EPHRAIM CHRYSLER DODGE -- rank: 617
... N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20, specifically N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (count III). The dealership has denied plaintiff's contentions of ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "The term 'merchandise' shall include any objects, wares, goods, commodities ... Div. 1991), certif. denied , 130 N.J. 6 (1992). Under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, there are two relevant types of unlawful conduct  "affirmative ...
docket: a3197-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47296
59 ROTIMI AZU OWOH v. JASON SENA -- rank: 617
... or real estate . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 'Sale' is defined to 'include any sale, rental or distribution ...
docket: a0035-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-01-27
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31132
60 URGESH GUPTA v. ASHA ENTERPRISES L.L.C. -- rank: 612
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] To make out a prima facie case under the CFA ... and usage unless it conforms to such definition and standard. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.10.] We disagree with the determination of the motion judge ... evidence of misrepresentations by Moghul Express's employees under either N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 or N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.10. In particular, we note plaintiffs' allegations that they were ...
docket: a3059-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-18
status: published
citation: 422 N.J. Super. 136 27 A.3d 953
Document Size: 53898
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!