Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 SCOTT DE POMPE v. WEICHERT REALTORS -- rank: 612

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] The CFA was amended in January 1976 to ... Neveroski and in the light of the 1975 amendment of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, the scope of the Act has been gradually broadened in ... 13 (1997), found Weichert liable under the CFA, holding that N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 makes a New Jersey real estate broker strictly liable for ...

docket:	a4912-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32285

62 BJ AMERICA ELECTRIC, LLC v. BMW NORTH AMERICA, LLC and PARK AVENUE BMW -- rank: 610

... O'Neill, 217 N.J. 99, 121-22 (2014) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). It requires 'fraudulent, deceptive or other similar kind of selling ...

docket:	a2517-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41642

63 FLEMING RUVOLDT PLLC v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED -- rank: 608

... Carter-Reed Co., 203 N.J. 496, 521 (2010) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, 8-19). 'An 'unlawful practice' contravening the CFA may arise ... subsequent performance of' an individual involved in such a transaction. N.J.S.A. 56:8- -2. Here, plaintiff claims it alleged 'a repeated and factually specific ...

docket:	a2009-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-09-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	74841

64 ROBERT WILSON, Individually et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 608

... constitute a violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 et seq. More particularly, the complaint identified the following specific ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In 1971, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 was amended to add "unconscionable commercial practice" to the list ...

docket:	A0943-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	123832

65 All The Way Towing, LLC v. Bucks County International, Inc. -- rank: 608

... connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The CFA defines “merchandise” to “include any objects ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] Our inquiry centers on the meaning of the ... d), and the word “person,” as used in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, refers to not only the person who engages in an ... also the person who is the victim of such practice, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (referencing practice as unlawful “whether or not any person ...

docket:	a-66-67-17
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2019-01-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	49917

66 FINDERNE MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC. v. JAMES W. BARRETT -- rank: 606

... or damaged thereby is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "[T]he legislative concern was over sharp practices and dealings ... sale or advertisement of . . . real estate" to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. During the trial, Barrett's counsel at times argued he ...

docket:	a1057-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-09-09
status:	published
citation:	402 N.J.Super. 546 955 A.2d 940
Document Size:	146641

67 SHATINA D. SUAREZ v. EASTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE -- rank: 603

... Corp. , 207 N.J. 557 , 576 (2011). In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 defines an unlawful practice under the CFA as follows: The ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby[.]" N.J.S.A. 56:8-2; Gonzalez , supra , 207 N.J. at 576-77; see also ...

docket:	a2705-10
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-23
status:	published
citation:	428 N.J.Super. 10 50 A.3d 75
Document Size:	80886

68 GARY AND BETH PROBOLA v. LONG & FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC -- rank: 601

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] See also Lemelledo v. Benefit Mgmt. Corp. , 150 N.J ... N.J. Super. at 533, 544 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). A real estate broker's "affirmative misrepresentation of material fact ... the purchaser." Ibid. (citation omitted). Consequently, "the clear language of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, . . . makes a real estate broker strictly liable for any material ...

docket:	a3923-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53621

69 JEFFREY S. JACOBS v. MARK LINDSAY AND SON PLUMBING HEATING, INC. -- rank: 601

... She found defendants engaged in an unconscionable commercial practice under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, when they filed a criminal complaint against plaintiff as means ...

docket:	a3854-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-20
status:	Published
citation:	458 N.J.Super. 194 203 A.3d 952
Document Size:	43953

70 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. SILVANA SOTILLO -- rank: 601

... suppression or omission . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added). "Any person who suffers any ascertainable loss of ...

docket:	a0653-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44620

71 TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. -- rank: 601

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] All violations of the CFA that result in an ascertainable ...

docket:	a0570-11 a0570-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-10 2014-03-10
status:	unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	110278

72 CHRISTA ROBEY v. SPARC GROUP LLC, -- rank: 599

... Consumer Fraud Act, we note the broad concepts embodied in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, which prohibits the use of 'unconscionable or abusive' commercial practices ...

docket:	a1384-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	36065

73 FREDRIC J. GROSS, et al. v. TJH AUTOMOTIVE CO., L.L.C. -- rank: 599

... motor vehicle "messenger service" charge is "unconscionable" in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Plaintiff further contends that "defendants' expert report was inadmissible and ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] As already noted, the CFA is remedial legislation which should ...

docket:	a5630-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-09-09
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 176
Document Size:	78248

74 MS SERVICES, LLC, v. PASQUALE CALABRIA -- rank: 599

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 'In light of the CFA's remedial purpose, courts liberally ... or an unconscionable practice by BOTW that was prohibited under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, dismissal for failure to state a claim was warranted. Calabria ...

docket:	a3703-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41788

75 PATRICIA C. MYSKA v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 599

... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Further, "[t]he Legislature included 'services' within the definition of ...

docket:	a4398-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	92375