Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 PATRICIA C. MYSKA -- rank: 599

... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Further, "[t]he Legislature included 'services' within the definition of ...

docket:	a0275-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	published
citation:	440 N.J.Super. 458 114 A.3d 761
Document Size:	92496

77 MARIA STOECKER v. MARIO F. ECHEVARRIA -- rank: 599

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In addition, the CFA provides that: [t]o accomplish the ...

docket:	a1975-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	67267

78 Hilda Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc. -- rank: 599

... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] “Merchandise” includes “any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services or anything ... be applied in conjunction with other statutes or common law, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13 provides: The rights, remedies and prohibitions accorded by the ...

docket:	a-124-04
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2006-03-15
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	104598

79 MARIA STOECKER v. MARIO F. ECHEVARRIA -- rank: 599

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In addition, the CFA provides that: [t]o accomplish the ...

docket:	a1452-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-04
status:	published
citation:	408 N.J.Super. 597 975 A.2d 975
Document Size:	67330

80 BAYSIDE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH JEEP EAGLE, INC. v. ELIZABETH MA & DAVID MA -- rank: 599

... the "knowing concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact", N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, "whether or not the merchant acts in bad faith." Furst ... Super. 11 , 29 (App. Div. 1985). An "unconscionable commercial practice", N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, "is an amorphous concept obviously designed to establish a broad ...

docket:	a3575-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-05-26
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	91206

81 JOEL H. MOSKOW v. K. HOVNANIAN AT JACKSON, LLC -- rank: 597

... the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Courts have also divided the unlawful conduct of CFA claims ...

docket:	a6114-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53483

82 AKIA LESTER v. RAYMOND ZOLA -- rank: 597

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] As used in the statute, '[t]he term 'merchandise' shall ... statutory prohibition on deceptive practices in the sale of merchandise, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and of N.J.A.C. 13:45A-26C.2 ...

docket:	a2595-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36807

83 THE ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ELITE RESTORATION, INC. -- rank: 597

... CFA was enacted to protect consumers from unconscionable commercial practices. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2; see Finderne Mgmt. Co. v Barrett, 402 N.J. Super ...

docket:	atl-l-1903-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	43572

84 ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY SERVICES, INC., et al. v. BEATRICE TROUP et al. -- rank: 597

... court erred in dismissing their consumer fraud claims against defendants.      N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 prohibits:         The act, use or employment by any person of ...

docket:	a3410-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-07-25
status:	published
citation:	343 N.J. Super. 254
Document Size:	56775

85 TRACEY T. WILSON v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY -- rank: 595

... v. Merck & Co. , 192 N.J. 372, 389 (2007) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). In order to establish a claim under the CFA, the ... prove that the defendant was engaged in some fraudulent action, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, the Wilsons' failure to present any evidence of Deutsche Bank ...

docket:	a3327-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37759

86 GILLIAN L. SHARP v. SEARS HOME APPLIANCE SHOWROOM, LLC -- rank: 595

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] An 'unlawful practice' in violation of the CFA may arise ... is an omission pursuant to 8 A-1962-16T 1 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.' Id. at 51 (citations omitted). Furthermore, a plaintiff asserting a ...

docket:	a1962-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53633

87 Lemelledo v. Beneficial Mangement Corp. of America -- rank: 592

... person has in fact been mislead, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] The CFA defines "merchandise" as "any objects, wares, goods, commodities ... anything offered, directly or indirectly to the public for sale." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 to -2.12, and treble damages for violations, whether ... and prohibitions created by the common law or other statutes. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13.     The language of the CFA evinces a clear legislative ... are cumulative to those created by other sources of law. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13. Furthermore, the CFA, in allowing for private suits in ...

docket:	a-107-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-07-03
status:
citation:	146 N.J. 561
Document Size:	51071

88 Ellen Nobrega et als. v. Edison Glen Associates, et als. -- rank: 592

... connection with the sale or advertisement of any . . . real estate.” N.J.S.A . 56:8- 2.     In Strawn , Justice O'Hern, writing for a unanimous Court ... all unusual or material circumstances or features affecting the development.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Prohibitions expressed with the generality of the Consumer Fraud Act ...

docket:	a-130-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-05-22
status:
citation:	167 N.J. 520
Document Size:	77430

89 MARUKA USA, INC v. SPECIALTY LIGHTING INDUSTRIES, INC -- rank: 592

... or damaged thereby is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] A-2220-17T4 14 N.J.S.A. 56:8 ...

docket:	a2220-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48387

90 POMERANTZ PAPER CORP v. NEW COMMUNITY CORPORATION, NEW COMMUNITY HOMES ASSOCIATION, LTD NEW COMMUNITY SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING CORP., NEW COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT INC., NEW COMMUNITY ROSEVILLE CORP., NEW COMMUNITY MANOR HOUSING CORP., NEW COMMUNITY -- rank: 592

... or with the subsequent performance of such person as aforesaid[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Liability under the CFA can be premised on "three general ... or not to sell the same at the advertised price." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.2. Here, plaintiff did not actually "advertise" the price. Instead ...

docket:	a3334-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49230