Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 ANDREW KAPLAN v. WHOLESALE AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY CO. -- rank: 592

... had paid. Ibid. In so holding, the court relied on N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11, which provides: "Any person violating the provisions of the ... 19. Id. at 89-90. We are not convinced that N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 would entitle plaintiff to a refund here, since it ...

docket:	a2182-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	149590

92 ROBERT A. D'ANGELO v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC -- rank: 590

... not any person has been misled, deceived or damaged thereby." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added). Actions taken in connection with "collecting or enforcing ...

docket:	a4195-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57610

93 DEPOLINK COURT REPORTING & LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES v. DAVID S. ROCHMAN, ESQ -- rank: 590

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "The term 'merchandise' shall include any objects, wares, goods, commodities ... in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. "Sale" is defined as "any sale, rental or distribution, offer ...

docket:	a4117-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-26
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 325 64 A.3d 579
Document Size:	43707

94 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #68 WELFARE FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC. -- rank: 590

... intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission[.]" N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Unlawful practices under the Act "fall into three general categories ...

docket:	A0450-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-03-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	78552

95 NICOLE PELLEGRINO MULLER v. FRED ALLEN BUILDERS -- rank: 588

... concealment, suppression or omission of any material fact,' if intentional, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.' Allen v. V and A Bros., Inc., 208 N.J ... 0554-18T1 12 claimed violation is an omission pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.' Dugan, 231 N.J. at 51 (citations omitted). III. The ... by a corporation. 208 N.J. at 130-33 (citing N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). The Court made clear, however, that 'individuals were not liable ...

docket:	a0554-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29260

96 FOURNIER TRUCKING, INC v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 588

... dealing (count five), violation of the Consumer Fraud Act ('CFA'), N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (count six), and violation of the civil liability portion of ... are unlawful under Section 8-2 of the CFA. See N.J.S.A. 56:8- 2. The trial court soundly rejected this argument. 'An unconscionable practice ...

docket:	a1353-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	89444

97 MARK NEJMEH v. DOUG FORBES -- rank: 586

... 2(12), which violations constituted unfair practices in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, for which defendants were entitled to recover their ascertainable losses ... 12), that these violations constituted unfair practices in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and that defendants are entitled to recover their ascertainable losses ...

docket:	a1714-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-11-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47119

98 AMIEL DABUSH, et al. v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, f/k/a MERCEDES-BENZ USA, INC. -- rank: 586

... s] intent to mislead or knowing omission" as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and did not prove with reasonable certainty any ascertainable loss ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby[.] . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "To constitute consumer fraud . . . the business practice in question must ... not serve as a basis for a CFA claim under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Nor did MBUSA argue in its brief that summary judgment ...

docket:	A0970-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-05-26
status:	published
citation:	378 N.J. Super. 105 874 A.2d 111
Document Size:	84365

99 MATTHEW J. PLATKIN v. SMITH WESSON SALES CO., -- rank: 586

... of any merchandise . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In short, the CFA is intended to 'prevent deception, fraud ...

docket:	a3292-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-26
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	54156

100 Thiedemann, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz. USA., LLC -- rank: 586

... commercial practices, fraud, deception, false promise, false pretense, and misrepresentation. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. See Miller v. Am. Family Publishers , 284 N.J. Super ... respect of such violations, intent is not a required element. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. An “affirmative act” may be established by showing that a ...

docket:	a-41-04
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2005-05-18
status:
citation:	183 N.J. 234
Document Size:	70892

101 ABDM PROPERTIES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY v. BOHDAN O. MEUSZ -- rank: 586

... in connection with the sale or advertisement of . . . real estate. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "An offense arises under the [CFA] from an affirmative act ...

docket:	a4556-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48833

102 CARL POPE v. CRAFTSMAN BUILDERS INC -- rank: 582

... person has in fact been misled, deceived[,] or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Such practices can be divided into three general categories: affirmative ... intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression[,] or omission," N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added). Proof of any one of those acts or ...

docket:	a3138-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70475

103 Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc. -- rank: 582

... in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise . . . .” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The Act protects against knowing misrepresentations, omissions of material fact ...

docket:	a-77-03
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-11-15
status:
citation:	182 N.J. 1
Document Size:	76852

104 THOMAS MERRIGAN v. MAC J. KEYPORT -- rank: 579

... connection with the sale or advertisement of any . . . real estate." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The trial court found a genuine issue of material fact ...

docket:	a2419-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44951

105 ANTHONY D'AGOSTINO and DENISE D'AGOSTINO v. RICARDO MALDONADO -- rank: 579

... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice; . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] The CFA defines "'sale'" as "any sale, rental ... d]espite the CFA's reference to 'real estate' in [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2], courts have adopted a limited construction of the [statute's ... defendant had engaged in an "unconscionable commercial practice" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Id. at 483. While defendant points out the significant factual ...

docket:	a6005-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	58849