Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 MARIE MARSH VS NJ SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, ET AL -- rank: 497

... of the property, she was "responsible" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g for any part of the pollution which occurred while she ... s determination that she is "responsible" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g is legal error. She also contends his findings that she ... resulted from discharges occurring both before and during her ownership, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g which applies to transfers made on or after that date ...

docket:	a6557-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-25
status:	published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 620
Document Size:	24298

32 LACEY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 474

... and all damages resulting from a discharge of hazardous substances. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(a)." Handy & Harman v. Borough of Park Ridge , 302 N ... efforts comply with the NCP "to the greatest extent possible," N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g. The bonds and the payments by the ratepayers are simply ...

docket:	A2263-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-05-19
status:	published
citation:	369 N.J. Super. 261 848 A.2d 843
Document Size:	41026

33 LACEY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 474

... and all damages resulting from a discharge of hazardous substances. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(a)." Handy & Harman v. Borough of Park Ridge , 302 N ... efforts comply with the NCP "to the greatest extent possible," N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g. The bonds and the payments by the ratepayers are simply ...

docket:	A2359-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-05-19
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	40883

34 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0635-20.opn.html -- rank: 474

... parties to remove hazardous substances they discharged into the environment. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g. The Supreme Court has held that the statute also impliedly ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	42862

35 STEPHEN VOELLINGER v. ELECTRO-COATINGS, INC. -- rank: 466

... hazardous substances, whether occurring prior to the Act or after. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1); Handy & Harman v. Borough of Park Ridge , 302 ...

docket:	a2261-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	79766

36 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3632-15.opn.html -- rank: 466

... indirect damages' resulting from a discharge of a hazardous substance. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(a). N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11b, defines ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	39263

37 METEX CORP. V. FEDERAL INS. CO., ET AL -- rank: 460

... P.L. 1976, c. 141 (C.58:10-23.11f).                  [ N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1).] It is this statutory mandate that makes a ...

docket:	a6689-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-04-26
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 95
Document Size:	51455

38 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. CENTENNIAL LAND & DEVELOPMENT CORP. -- rank: 455

... in any way responsible" for discharge of hazardous substances under N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c) of the Spill Act, for its controlled subsidiary's ...

docket:	a4708-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	97464

39 v. GRANT OIL COMPANY, ABLE ENERGY, PARSIPPANY FUEL OIL, EDWARD HSI and AMY HSI and SPARTAN OIL COMPANY - and PETRO INC., JOHNSON OIL COMPANY MEENAN OIL COMPANY d/b/a REGIONAL OIL COMPANY and GRANT OIL COMPANY, ABLE ENERGY, INC PARSIPPANY FUEL OIL C -- rank: 438

... for any hazardous substance." Defendants maintain that they are neither. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1) provides in pertinent part: any person who has ... the joint and several liability mandated by the Spill Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1). A review of the trial judge's decision ...

docket:	a0313-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-23
status:	published
citation:	432 N.J.Super. 287 74 A.3d 968
Document Size:	51729

40 John Ross v. Karen Lowitz -- rank: 435

... Act imposes strict, joint and several liability upon dischargers. See N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1) (“[A]ny person who has discharged a ...

docket:	A-101-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-08-06
status:
citation:
Document Size:	123556

41 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. ESSEX CHEMICAL CORPORATION -- rank: 426

... without regard to fault, for all cleanup and removal costs. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1). The term "cleanup and removal costs" is defined ...

docket:	a0367-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44559

42 DAVID SELTZER v. KRISTOFER CHIESA MELISSA CHIESA, A-1 HOME INSPECTIONS LLC, JOSEPH M. VITALE VICTOR INFANTE, and MICHELLE RAIO and USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and AAA MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY WEICHERT CO., and ROCHELLE TOBO -- rank: 424

... clean-up costs, does not apply to his situation. See N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(c)(1). Interpreting "claim" to include this future possibility, in ...

docket:	a2393-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	47983

43 48 HORSEHILL, LLC v. KENRO CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 401

... removal costs incurred by the department or a local unit . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g c (1).] S ee Hous. Auth. v. Suydam Investors, L ...

docket:	A2682-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	107131

44 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Cat in the Hat, LLC -- rank: 401

... in defense of a claim for cleanup and removal costs. N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g-d(1)(4). Furthermore, just compensation for property acquired by ... contamination remains liable even after transfer of the property. See N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g-c(1) (“Any person who has discharged a hazardous substance ...

docket:	a-42-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-07-10
status:
citation:	177 N.J. 29
Document Size:	50710

45 NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION v. JOHN P. KEEGAN -- rank: 396

... Act, we note that the Commission does not rely on N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11g(d)(5) or argue that Keegan is liable under this ...

docket:	a6090-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52629